These pages will be
regularly updated (refresh your browser each revisit)
The
SWISSAIR Flight 111 Accident
and
Cockpit
(CREW) Resource Management
in
Airline Long-Haul Flights
SITE LAST UPDATED
THURSDAY 17
Sep 99
|
This site
contains a commentary on Swissair Flt 111's accident near Halifax on 2 September
1998.
The intention is to draw public attention
to the unsatisfactory over-tasking of a two-man flight crew when
an emergency such as "Smoke in
the Cockpit" occurs.
BRING BACK the THIRD
CREW MEMBER
(call
him a Flight Engineer)
There is a consensus developing that the Swissair pilots were
"designed into" this
tragic accident. The MD-11 was always mooted as a two man operation,
largely on the
strength of its electronic surveillance monitoring and action system, full
authority digital engine control (FADEC) and glass cockpit (flight and
engine
instruments on six CRT screens). There was a limited amount of backup
analogue and
manual reversion available -but evidently not enough to allow a daring duo
to cope
when the volts were misdirected by malfunction. "In Zurich,
Swissair's chief
pilot-designate, Rainer Hiltebrand, said Tuesday a total loss of power was
virtually
unthinkable." If there had been a "THIRD MAN" systems
supervisor, would he have
been a help or a hindrance? Notwithstanding the emerging revelations of
Kapton
wiring design faults, flammable metallized mylar insulation blankets and
foolishly connected Inflight Entertainment Systems, the author is advocating a return to a
three-man cockpit -at least for Long Haul RPT
(Regular Public Transport). The contention is that a flight engineer just may make the
critical difference in off-loading the flying pilots when things start to come unglued.
The Author is a veteran
of three Air Forces, two wars and holds an
ATPL. He has thousands of four-engined flight hours in the
company of flight
engineers and still wouldn't leave home without one. He
doesn't trust designers and
ventures that pilots often have to abide by what they're
offered to fly. He
is convinced that a widened, honest internet debate on air
safety issues will stop
the constrained, inhouse, litigation-aware
investigation outcomes that have,
together with cut-throat competition, security issues and airline deregulation, made the
travelling public ever more concerned for their flying
safety.
These pages will be regularly updated
(refresh your browser
each revisit) |
|

|
|
Click Here to Visit the IASA
SITE
|
|
The
Virgin Bus Index
INDEX BY TOPICS
Go
to the MEMO SITE (an admonition to another
MD11 Operator)
AVIATION SAFETY LINKS
ORIGINAL
ARC
TRACKING SITE
The SR111 site
Atlantic
Aviation Assistance Coalition

Initial Article
Revised Comments
Experts News
Likely Developments
Interesting POSTS
MD11 Technical Discussion
FAA Submission
Flight
Engineer/Second Officer Statistics
Boeing MD11 Blurb
More Detail on
the MD11
Back
to top of page
Feedback
to author
"AirlineSafety.Com - Promoting
free-market/limited government solutions to airline safety issues."
Memorial Site
