Report for the Constitutional Commission
Presented by ORT Democracy Network Program
February 25, 1998
Results from “The Second Albanian NGO Forum on the Constitution:
the Legislative Power”
On 16 January 1998 at Tirana International Hotel the “Second NGO Forum
on the
Constitution: The Legislative Power” was held. The participants
represented various
NGOs and Law School. This forum followed the format of the first
one organized on the
Judiciary. Using “brainstorming,” Albanian and foreign facilitators
led participants through
an exercise identifying issues that they considered most important
for the new
constitution relating to the legislative branch.
There were many issues raised, and
through multivoting the list of most important issues were identified.
The specialists that
will participate in the accompanying Focused Discussion Groups will
use these issues as a
basis for developing various suggestions for how a Constitution might
be structured. The
Second NGO Forum results were presented to the Constitution Commission
of
Parliament on 25 February 1998.
Below you will find a list of the issues that the participants identified
on Legislative Power.
They are listed generally according to the number of votes they received
during the voting
process. The forum was not designed to provide for solutions
to the issues. However,
we have presented underneath each issue some concerns and comments
of the
participants.
The ORT Democracy Network, a USAID funded program, with the organizational
support of Administrative Center for Coordination of Assistance and
Public Participation
(ACCAPP) organized this forum. At the forum representatives of
other International
Donors like USAID, Venice Commission of the Council of Europe (CoE),
and the
Central and East Europe Law Initiative of the American Bar Association
(ABA/CEELI)
observed and assisted.
Issues to be Addressed in the Constitution
Structure of the Parliament: 2 Houses vs. 1 House (Respective Powers)
Participants held that it is important for the Constitution to provide
whether the Albanian
Parliament will be composed of one house or two. In determining
the structure of the
Parliament, the Albanian tradition should be taken into consideration.
There were
different ideas discussed, but all were of the opinion that it is very
important to clearly
define the powers of each house if there will be two houses.
Legislative Initiative
The participants considered it very important to provide in the constitution
which bodies
are entitled to initiate legislation. They suggested to
include NGOs in the list of bodies
possessing the legislative initiative.
Procedures for Approving and Amending the Constitution
The participants discussed the procedure to adopt and amend the Constitution.
Sovereignty and Its Delegation
The issue generated a lot of discussion. Because of the
new orientation of Albania
towards Europe and the European Union, participants where interested
in clarifying its
relationship to Albanian sovereignty.
Incompatibility of the Office of Minister with the Position of Parliamentary Deputy
The participants considered it very important that this issue
be resolved in the
Constitution. According to most of the people who raised this
issue, the ministers should
not have a seat in Parliament because of the risk of an overlap of
powers.
Position of the Parliament in the Separation of Powers
It is very important for the powers to be separated, and at the same
time, it is very
important to provide for a clear relationship between them. What
is the role of
Parliament with regard to the other powers? Should the
Parliament be superior to other
powers?
Who has the Power to Call and to Dissolve the Parliament and When?
Who has
the Power to Call for Early Elections?
The participants discussed the importance of specifying the powers of
the President
and/or Parliament concerning this issue.
Separation of Powers
The Constitution should specifically spell out the separation of powers
and the powers of
each branch.
The Right of Veto
The right of veto should be provided, but the use of this instrument
should be specified in
order to ensure that it does not oppress or block democracy and the
independence of
other bodies.
Guaranties on the Implementation of Laws
This is an issue on which there were different ideas given. For
example, which bodies will
be entitled to review the constitutionality of laws? Independently
from the different
options, the implementation of existing laws was stressed.
Drafting Procedures and the Right of Citizens to Raise Important Issues in the Parliament
The participants discussed the right of citizens to participate in the
lawmaking process. It
was recommended that the drafters define in what way the citizens
may raise issues
important to them at the Parliament. The direct participation
of the citizens in
consultations at the draft phase was considered very important and
a high form of direct
democracy.
The Power to Remove the President
Which body will be entitled to remove the President from his position?
How will this
issue be resolved in case the President will be elected by direct vote
of the people?
Determination of the Form of Government
It is very important to provide in the Constitution the form of government.
This will
resolve not only the issue of the President’s election (direct
by the people or by the
Parliament), but also the respective powers of the Parliament and President.
The Right of the Voters to Recall Representatives in the Parliament:
When,
How and Why the Electorate has the Right to Revoke a Deputy’s Mandate
One option in a democracy is the possibility of the electorate to recall
a representative in
the Parliament. Participants considered this an important
right of the electorate and
noted the need for specific procedures related to that.
Number, Composition, and Internal Organization of the Parliament
Participants emphasized the need for a clear picture of the number,
composition, and
structure of the Parliament. This structure should establish
and foresee public access and
additional mechanisms of democracy.
Publication, Interpretation, and Effectiveness of Laws
Participants stated that this issue has its importance not only from
the procedural point of
view, but also for its substantive impact on public participation.
Under this issue,
participants focused on the fact that laws must be adequately funded,
or this will serve as
an excuse for implementation problems. Also, there should
not be “secret” laws and/or
regulations.
Defining the Term of the Legislature
In this respect, there were two main discussions: the effectiveness
of using shorter
legislative terms and the cost that it implies.
Technical Parliamentary Commissions
Both ad hoc and permanent Parliamentary Commissions should be
created for specific
reasons, and there should be a clear distinction drawn between them.
Who Appoints/Elects the President
The participants would like to know more about the possible options.
Organization and Promulgation of Referenda
The Constitution should specify the groups entitled to call a referendum
on various issues.
Power of the Parliament to Control the Defense Structures and the Defense Policy
Participants considered it important that the Parliament should be entitled
to control the
military structures and the defense policy of Albania.
Power to Determine National Policies
The participants identified as important the power of Parliament
to determine the national
policies.