|
28 June 2005: I was thinking about what I aim for in a poem--actually, I was thinking about what I don't aim for, mainly moral injunctions. I prefer pure images, uncommented on. Probably, the best example of what I hope for in a poem of mine is "Seaside Mathemaku," which is in my gallery here, but which I'll show again:
![]()
I almost forgot the distant sail. A symbol of far-off romance. Also another image of quietude--but with a destination. It is multiplied by "musick"--music from centuries ago, another yesterday. . . . to result in the bay, which only needs the dream of marauders to make it the richest of yesterdays--if the poem works as well as I hope it does.
Then there is the long division paraphernalia--the dividend shed, as I call it, and the remainder line--which make the central complex of text and graphics a mathematical process, or something that achieves a kind of Undeniable, Permanent High Correctness outside the messiness of material reality.
I will be greatly disappointed if no one can ever add more to what I've said about my poem. But only a willful reader will find more than an image cluster, a mood, colors and a design--and a surprising lot of rhyme, alliteration, consonance, assonance and word-play for such a short text. No politics, no religion, no philosophy, no sex, no message of any kind--unless you count "enjoy." Yes, art for art's sake.
I might add that just about all my thoughts about what the poem is about and/or does are post facto. In composing it, I basically felt my way to a design I liked, with words I liked. But I may well have junked it if it didn't so reassuringly yield the reasonably intriguing, logical--but incomplete--interpretation I feel it has.
|
|
|
|