|
12 May 2005: I stole from today's paper (the Charlotte Herald-Tribune)for something to talk about in today's entry:
I can't say I have come to grips with Congo's accomplishment. I have a mind-grope headed toward the idea that chimps, and probably other animals, have archetypal images hard-wired into their brains, as we have. I call them urcepts. Also an innate universal feel for design. Maybe also an innate potential for action painting, for dancing strokes onto canvas rhythmically.
My main problem is figuring out where painters like Francis, Pollock, Gottlieb, whom I greatly admire, did more than Congo. I'm sure their paintings were more complex, and their oeuvres much more complex.
I wonder if Congo had seen any non-representational paintings before making his own. . . .
Some songbirds equal renowned composers at creating music. And whales. Or do they? I can't say I really know.
I'm safe. My illumages are all parts of mathemaku, and no chimp has yet made a mathemaku. I believe machines one day will, though. If they can play chess, they can make art--although there will be those forever sure that human beings have some secret mystical ability to do things machines will never be able to do, like the "creative imagination" Kasparov thought great chess-players have but not computers.
|
|
|
|