|
7 May 2005: The following artwork is from the recent issue of ARTnews that "Trojan Horse" was in. This one seems to me clearly a visual poem: the noise its text represents is monumental, and a significant part of the fore-burden of the piece, what that is, and I haven't pinned it down yet. Something, perhaps, about the void that "junk"-reading fills, and its interruption--by a pencil's breaking? Or literature as a refuge from noise? I dunno.
![]()
Taxonomically, what is significant is that "Noise" is not labeled a visual poem but a painting. So it cannot be generalized that everyone calls mixtures of text and graphics "visual poems," so we also must. I would argue that many traditionalists in literature would also dispute that anything with graphics can be a "poem." Not that it matters to me, finally. To me what counts is whether it makes sense to call something a "visual poem." That question has nothing to do with who calls it that.
|
|
|
|