Blog440
Daily Notes on Poetry & Related Matters


16 April 2005: A couple of weeks ago, Karl Kempton sent me an e.mail I didn't get during a period when my computer was misbehaving. He re-sent the e.mail yesterday, suggesting I post it here and discuss it, so here it is, with my comments to follow:

a small suggestion -- perhaps -- that may save you some time and anxiety regarding the bell curve of poetics. us visual poets are without doubt a few stand deviations in the forefront of poetry. we have the ability and or the gift to be multi-media orientated. this orientation is either self taught through hard work and or a natural inclination.

those behind us as the spectrum of multi-media understanding recedes, have less of such an inclination. hitting them over the head may be useless. their brains are already wired. the only way to reach is teach the young mind to see more ways than one.

in sad fact, poets may be more reactionary by nature when it comes to poetics than your standard religious fanatic -- or equal to -- when it comes to literal understanding of what what is . . .

so spin thy mind not in the hamster cage of debating the foolish, but on the power grid of creativity . . .

Karl is certainly right in thinking I will probably never dent the outlooks of the poets I call stasguards with my harangues or (rare) more thoughtful discussions. Nevertheless . . .

I think I have an innate need to argue, for one thing. Even if the other side ignores me, as is pretty much the case here. Fortunately, it's easy for me, so doesn't take too much time from better pursuits. Aside from that, I have a great need to explain myself and justify what I do. So I (perhaps too often) expound on the kind of poetry I admire and try to compose myself, just to put my thoughts on record, not to make converts to my kind of poetry. Related to this is my need to know what I'm doing as a poet. This, for me, but not for everybody, involves being able to describe what I do in words. And show why it's of value (which sometimes requires me to show why other ways of doing poetry are of lesser value).

I'm a jerk, too--so I like to annoy those I can't convert with my opinions of them. It's only fair considering how much they annoy me with their opposition to just about all I hold of value in poetry. I like to think that what I say may boost the morale of other toilers in otherstream poetry, too. Simply to know you're not alone in your belief that there are other ways to make poetry besides the certified ones has to do that for them, I would think. It certainly does for me.

Sure, my hitting the enemy over the head as caustically as I sometimes do--with words like "stasguard," for instance--might make it hard for the few who might otherwise be sympathetic to my point of view to accept it. But I have to be true to myself, and say what I feel.

In the final analysis, by far the best way to deal with stasguards is to ignore them, and make the best poems you can, knowing that in the end those poems are what will pull you ahead of the stasguards--if you're destined to pull ahead of them--not your arguments against them. So that is where I spend most of my energies, however it may sometimes seem otherwise.





  









PicoSearch
  Help
Site Search by PicoSearch





COMMENTS

Use the box below to respond to this entry. Negative feedback is especially welcome. It will get to me anonymously, so you need have no fear it will result in my using my immense influence to wreck your literary career, if you have one. On the other hand, if you want to hear back, please include your e.mail address with your message.    --Bob


Click SEND to mail response. You will then be shown a copy of what you sent.
To return here, click BACK, which should be at the top of the screen, to the far left.
(Note: it may take a day or several days for your comment to appear at my blog.)



Previous Entry

Next Entry


Blog Home-Page

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1