Blog409
Daily Notes on Poetry & Related Matters


16 March 2005: The discussion I got into yesterday New-Poetry went on. Toward the end, I was asked if I have any indices for predicting greatness? My answer is hardly worth passing on here, but I just mowed my lawn (for the first time since the hurricane), and am too beat to come up with anything else for this entry, so here is what I said: "Sure. But it'd take me several books to do so. It'd have to do with archetypal depth, metaphorical freshness and size, number of devices well-used, number of senses engaged. Size of world. Complexity of view. Clarity times complexity (so 100% clarity times 1% coverage of existence would score lower than 60% clarity times 2% coverage of existence. Etc." That was it.

















PicoSearch
  Help
Site Search by PicoSearch





COMMENTS

Use the box below to respond to this entry. Negative feedback is especially welcome. It will get to me anonymously, so you need have no fear it will result in my using my immense influence to wreck your literary career, if you have one. On the other hand, if you want to hear back, please include your e.mail address with your message.    --Bob


Click SEND to mail response. You will then be shown a copy of what you sent.
To return here, click BACK, which should be at the top of the screen, to the far left.
(Note: it may take a day or several days for your comment to appear at my blog.)



Previous Entry

Next Entry

Blog Home-Page

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1