13 January 2005: The other day, a wack challenged my self-proclaimed expertise
in poetry by asking me what the following is and what it's doing (I having said that what I consider myself an expert in poetry at is in revealing what it is and what it does):
Later, I found out it was by the "genius," Bob Dylan. Didn't change my opinion. It's good folk verse but not what I'd call poetic genius.
My opponent flared up, needless to say. Not only have I always been contemptuous of his conspiracy theory, but now I was belittling a contemporary hero of his! We later got into over what "doggerel" is. I said the proper definition of it is "unmetrical rhyming poem," but poetry they don't like for Philistines. My Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary has verse that is "loosely styled and irregular in measure . . . also: marked by triviality or inferiority." I simply chuck the last as subjective and therefore worthless as a definition. The intelligent definition of a word is always the one I try to use, not the dictionary, or the "people's," definition when, as is so often the case, it is not intelligent. (I sometimes go so far as to think that humankind is speciating into those who use words for maximally clear communication and blockheads (who are preyed on by a third strain who use words principally to swindle the blockheads).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|