THE Boundary Park casualty unit took in another victim today when Mark Innes arrived for treatment on a hip injury. The 21-year-old midfielder was hurt in last night's home defeat against Chesterfield and is now doubtful for the weekend visit of Cardiff. Athletic already have seven senior players out of action, four of them for the rest of the season. The problems have seen Innes become central to their plans — despite him being on the transfer list — but the squad could now be decimated even further. Innes came off worst when he challenged for a high ball seconds after half-time last night. He lasted for another five minutes but was holding his hip and clearly playing in discomfort.
It was a bad night all round for Athletic, who fell victim to Chesterfield's first away win since September. Manager Andy Ritchie said: "People will say we had a young side, but those players have to learn quickly. "We switched off after we scored and there was a lack of communication at the back." Athletic's reserves are back in action tonight with a Pontins League fixture against West Brom (7 pm kick-off). The side will include two trialists in Michael Harris and Simon Glover. Harris is a first-year professional who is being released by Newcastle, while Glover has had spells with QPR, Nottingham Forest and Fulham. Both will play in defence, along with Ian McLean, who has been out in the cold all year.
McLean
is available on a free transfer and Athletic have been leaving him out
of the reserves to give their younger professionals a game. But the injury
crisis has bitten so deep that the 21-year-old defender is now drafted
in as emergency cover. Athletic are also
resting some of their fringe players as the reserves have another game
tomorrow night, at Scunthorpe. Reserves (from): Robertson, Harris, Glover,
Haining, Futcher, McLean, Wharton, Walsh, Froggatt, Gardiner, McLaughlin,
Roberts, Oliver, Smith, Rock, Whittle.
Ritchie’s
rap for ‘rubbish’ display ATHLETIC’S
youngsters were given a rude awakening last night as Chesterfield — a team
with only five wins in 41 league games — inflicted an embarrassing defeat
at Boundary Park. Injuries and inexperience
were clearly massive factors, but Andy Ritchie’s men simply didn’t function
against visitors who still look doomed to the drop. The
manager was in no mood for showing pity and locked his side in the dressing
room for a half-hour post-match inquest. When
he emerged, he kept his comments short and not very sweet. “There
has been a long meeting,” Ritchie said, “because, after the first 20 minutes,
we were total rubbish — and that’s putting it mildly. “We
played into their hands and accepted defeat. That’s the most disappointing
aspect of the whole thing.”
The
players on Athletic’s sick-list constituted more than half a team, with
the likes of Garnett, Graham, Rickers, Sheridan, Adams, Dudley and Allott
all missing. Although 12 members of last
night’s squad were aged 21 or under, Ritchie was right — after going in
front with a brilliant goal on the break, Athletic surrendered the points
far too easily. It was good to see the
likes of David Miskelly, Phil Salt and Danny Boshell get extended runs,
but how the side missed a bigger sprinkling of experience. They
were totally unable to stamp their authority and clearly missed the steel
and guidance those older heads can provide. In
midfield, Athletic were a shadow of the dominant force which was too much
for Wigan seven days earlier. Passing
was poor and they were second to everything, with Lee Duxbury looking jaded
and Salt unable to make any impact in his first game since August. Compounding
the problem, the wing-backs allowed Chesterfield to dictate to them and,
as a result, were too withdrawn. The
forwards had no sparkle, the defence dropped almighty clangers . . . are
any more reasons needed for this dismal, and surprising, defeat?
It
would be unfair to blame the slump solely on Athletic’s inadequacies. Chesterfield
needed guts to recover from Steve Whitehall’s early goal and were justly
delighted with their efforts. David Reeves
showed quality in attack, while the effervescent Ryan Williams had a tremendous
game in midfield. The Spireites showed
great spirit to cling on to their slender survival lifeline and end a seven-month
run without an away win. But Athletic
made them look an awful lot better than they really are. Their
record this season tells an eloquent tale of its own. And if Ritchie’s
side are to live with the best in the division next term, they will have
to shake off their reckless inconsistency — injuries or not. Athletic
took the lead after 15 minutes with a lightning-fast attack which, flattering
though the comparison may be, was taken straight from the Manchester United
textbook. It began when goalkeeper Miskelly
caught a high cross and, Peter Schmeichel-style, threw quickly to Mark
Innes on the halfway line. His pass
down the left found Matthew Tipton timing his run to perfection and, when
Tipton crossed low to the far post, Whitehall tapped in to become his side’s
joint-top scorer with 11.
Thanks
to their goalkeeper’s quick thinking, Athletic had sprung from one end
of the field to the other in about 10 seconds flat. In
teamwork terms, it was one of their best goals of the season. And its simplicity
was something Chesterfield failed miserably to copy when they broke away
themselves in the 23rd minute. A Chris
Perkins centre found Athletic undermanned in defence as Reeves and Roger
Willis waited to pounce. Both forwards
looked afraid to shoot and, by the time they had finished hesitating and
passing, there were enough men back to block Willis’s eventual drive. Yet
the lethargic hosts didn’t heed the warning, and they were punished just
before the half-hour as Williams bagged the equaliser. When
Mark Hotte’s control let him down 30 yards from goal, the little midfielder
stole the ball and exchanged passes with Willis. He
still had plenty to do as he reached the edge of the area, but an accurate
left-foot shot snaked its way into the bottom corner.
It
was a breakthrough the visitors deserved and they continued to pour forward,
with Williams providing a chance for Reeves. They
thought they had gone in front in the 42nd minute, but a Willis header
was touched on to the post by Miskelly and bounced straight back into the
grateful goalkeeper’s arms. The winner,
however, did arrive moments later, again after some atrocious defending
from Athletic. The home rearguard simply
stood and watched the ball as it rolled towards the by-line, apparently
thinking they were guaranteed a goal-kick. But
Chesterfield had other ideas and Williams scampered across to pick up possession
and cross for an unmarked Willis, who slotted in easily from six yards. After
Athletic brought on Boshell and Ryan Sugden in the second half, there was
a temporary lift which saw Andrew Holt test ‘keeper Mark Gayle. Other
than that one minor scare, Chesterfield were comfortable at the back, as
well as looking more threatening going forward. Willis
had a diving header blocked before Duxbury fired too close to Gayle with
a rare Athletic opening. Salt and Sugden
went close in injury time, but Athletic’s late flurry lacked conviction. Not
only that, but it summed up the 90 minutes which had gone before.
Town-green
bid is rejected again THE
second bid to make Clayton playing fields a town green, scuppering the
Sports Park 2000 scheme, has failed. Members
of the Commons Registration Sub-committee decided the application to give
the land protected status, submitted by three members of the Clayton Action
Group, did not meet the criteria. They voted by three votes to two to throw
out the bid, leaving the way clear for a new stadium to built on the land
— if the Charity Commission agree to the proposals.
An
Oldham Council solicitor, Mr Gareth Owen, warned the five councillors —
two Liberal Democrat and three Labour — that they must separate their roles
as trustees and councillors in the matter. But the voting was along party
lines, with Lib-Dem councillors Keith Pendlebury and Brian Lord defeated
by Labour councillors David Hibbert, Andrew Lyon and chairman David Heyes.
Councillor
Pendlebury called for the matter to be settled by an independent inquiry,
saying the complex legal issues could be beyond laymen. But Mr Owen said
that even if an independent inspector was appointed, he could only make
a recommendation to the committee. Members
would still have to decide whether to accept the recommendation or not.
He added that the crucial factors were whether the fields had been used
as of right for not less than 20 years; whether the fields were for the
benefit of a defined locality — the deed of gift stating Royton, Chadderton
and Oldham does not qualify; and whether criteria were met for the small
part of the land behind the Rifle Range Inn.
Councillors
Pendlebury and Lord argued that use was as of right for more than 20 years
because anybody could go on there without permission to walk their dog
or play. Councillor Pendlebury added:
“It is clear there needs to be permission for organised activities, because
20 teams cannot use the same pitch. “Whether
organisation constitutes permission is neither here nor there. We are referring
to non-organised, legal activities, and it is clear that such use is as
of right.” Councillor Lord claimed locality
was difficult to define in this case, but was not entirely relevant, as
the fields, once protected, would be for a particular area, but anyone
would be allowed to use them.
Councillor
David Hibbert said the town-green bid fails on three measures, as explained
in the legal advice to the council. He added: “The permission to use the
land comes from the trust. You cannot argue on one hand that the trust
gives people the right to use it, then say that people do not have to have
the right. “It is difficult to satisfy
the locality, because it is not clear where the locality is. If it was
a village, people could say it is for that village. “But I have lived in
Chadderton for nearly 40 years and, on this proposed locality, I would
not be part of the locality it was for.” Councillor Pendlebury said that
even the two London barristers employed by the council could not agree
on the matter of whether the trust gave permission to use the land. One
claimed lawful use was as of right, but a second claimed the trust granted
permission. But Mr Owen said they took
the latter advice because the former’s version of the definitions in question
was unjustifiably restrictive and could fail at a later appeal. He added:
“The legal advice is that there are four component parts to register a
town green, and two are met and two are not met.”
Action
group’s battle to continue MEMBERS
of the Clayton Action Group said today the fight to protect the fields
will go on. It is anticipated a third
town green bid will now be submitted — addressing the points on which the
last one failed. Mel Fitton, who led
the first application, said: “There will be another application in the
near future. “It could eventually finish
up in court, but it would be a civil court. As far as we are concerned,
it is still full steam ahead to get the land protected.” He
added: “We are not surprised at the result of this meeting. We always planned
to go on. “Our solicitor has not had time to answer the objections, we
have only had six weeks. “We are all
working people, and when you think my case went for nearly two years, that
is not a long time.” He said he would
have preferred the applicants —Simon Hewitt, Alma Haslam, and Beverly Macyna
— to be there, but Mrs Macyna’s son is critically ill in hospital.
Mr
Fitton said: “One reason for my delay was the solicitor to the council
was off sick for two months. “They have
21 solicitors for the council, we have one - plus a few part-time amateurs.” Mrs
Haslam added: “Our solicitor says we have a very good case and we have
not played our aces yet. “Counsel has
said use of the land is `as of right’ and the laws on locality may change
soon. There may also be a case in civil law to remove the trustees. We
have had a solicitor for just six weeks, and when we were sent the objections
we only had two weeks to respond to them. The fight will definitely go
on.”
The simplicity of the goal was something Chesterfield failed to copy when they broke away themselves in the 23rd minute. A Chris Perkins centre found David Reeves and Roger Willis waiting to pounce, yet both forwards delayed for too long and allowed the Oldham defence to block. Chesterfield learned their lesson just before the half hour, bagging an equaliser through the outstanding Ryan Williams. The midfield man robbed Mark Hotte 30 yards from goal, exchanged passes with Willis and hit an accurate left-foot drive into the bottom corner from the edge of the box. It was a breakthrough Chesterfield deserved and they thought they had gone in front in the 42nd minute when a Willis header was touched on to the post by Miskelly and bounced straight back into the grateful keeper's hands.
The winner did
arrive moments later, once again thanks to some nightmare defending from
Oldham. They simply stood and watched as the ball crept out for a goal-kick
but Williams had other ideas and reacted quickly to take possession and
cross for an unmarked Willis, who slotted in from six yards. Oldham made
two changes early in the second half and visiting goalkeeper Mark Gayle
faced a rare test in the 58th minute from Andrew Holt's volley. Other than
that half-chance, Chesterfield remained comfortable at the back, as well
as looking more threatening going forward. Willis had a diving header blocked
before Lee Duxbury's shot was saved, and both Phillip Salt and Ryan Sugden
fired wide. But Oldham's late rally was never enough to stave off a surprise
defeat.
| Oldham 1, Chesterfield 2 |
| Last
three meetings
Chesterfield 0, Oldham 1 (6/11/1999) Chesterfield 1, Oldham 3 (26/12/1998) Oldham 2, Chesterfield 0 (22/8/1998) |
| Final |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fans that attend the reserves games often and who have seen the youngster in action will be scratching their heads in disbelieve if he does move on because he's a very good player. If somebody asked us to name those in the ranks that would more than likely come through, Murphy would have been one in our opinion. Steve McMahon, the manager of Blackpool, is hoping that he can persuade Murphy to join his side, should he leave Liverpool.
Chesterfield may be doomed to relegation but they showed they are more than willing to go down fighting with a 2-1 away win over Oldham. It was only their sixth win in a miserable season and a young Oldham side - with an average age 22 - could have no argument at the result. The Latics went in front after 15 minutes when a quick throw from keeper David Miskelly ended with Steve Whitehall shooting home his 11th goal of the season. But the Spireites bounced back to stun the home side with two goals before the break. Ryan Williams equalised in the 29th minute when he cut inside from the right to let fly from 20 yards out. Then Oldham suffered more agony from the 43rd minute when Chesterfield took the lead. This time Williams turned provider for Roger Willis to neatly flick in his perfect cross at the near post.
Bristol City overcame their Wembley disappointment by holding on for their seventh away win of the season at Luton. Two days after losing at Stoke in the final of the Auto Windscreens Shield, City overturned the Hatters 2-1. Scott Murray put them ahead with a brilliant chip from the edge of the box after 28 minutes, but Luton fought back strongly in the second half and City were indebted to a mixture of good saves by Billy Mercer and substandard finishing by the Hatters. Mickey Bell doubled City's lead on 77 minutes but within a minute Gary Doherty replied for Luton. That set up a grandstand finish with City defending in numbers to hang on to the points.
| Pos. | Team | Pts | Pl. | W | D | L | F | A | Diff |
| 1 | Preston | 86 | 42 | 25 | 11 | 6 | 68 | 33 | +35 |
| 2 | Wigan | 78 | 42 | 21 | 15 | 6 | 68 | 34 | +34 |
| 3 | Millwall | 78 | 42 | 22 | 12 | 8 | 68 | 41 | +27 |
| 4 | Bristol R | 76 | 42 | 22 | 10 | 10 | 64 | 40 | +24 |
| 5 | Burnley | 76 | 42 | 21 | 13 | 8 | 58 | 41 | +17 |
| 6 | Gillingham | 75 | 41 | 22 | 9 | 10 | 69 | 44 | +25 |
| 7 | Stoke | 70 | 41 | 19 | 13 | 9 | 60 | 40 | +20 |
| 8 | Notts Co | 64 | 42 | 18 | 10 | 14 | 58 | 48 | +10 |
| 9 | Bristol C | 60 | 42 | 14 | 18 | 10 | 53 | 48 | +5 |
| 10 | Luton | 56 | 42 | 16 | 8 | 18 | 58 | 61 | -3 |
| 11 | Wycombe | 55 | 42 | 14 | 13 | 15 | 51 | 49 | +2 |
| 12 | Oldham | 55 | 42 | 15 | 10 | 17 | 46 | 51 | -5 |
| 13 | Reading | 55 | 42 | 14 | 13 | 15 | 53 | 60 | -7 |
| 14 | Bournemouth | 54 | 42 | 16 | 6 | 20 | 54 | 56 | -2 |
| 15 | Brentford | 50 | 42 | 13 | 11 | 18 | 44 | 55 | -11 |
| 16 | Wrexham | 50 | 42 | 13 | 11 | 18 | 46 | 61 | -15 |
| 17 | Bury | 49 | 41 | 11 | 16 | 14 | 53 | 56 | -3 |
| 18 | Colchester | 48 | 42 | 13 | 9 | 20 | 53 | 76 | -23 |
| 19 | Cambridge | 45 | 42 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 60 | 58 | +2 |
| 20 | Oxford | 40 | 42 | 11 | 7 | 24 | 38 | 69 | -31 |
| 21 | Scunthorpe | 39 | 42 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 39 | 67 | -28 |
| 22 | Cardiff | 38 | 41 | 7 | 17 | 17 | 40 | 58 | -18 |
| 23 | Blackpool | 36 | 42 | 7 | 15 | 20 | 42 | 70 | -28 |
| 24 | Chesterfield | 31 | 42 | 6 | 13 | 23 | 48 | 52 | -4 |