MBL Platoon Statistics Page
This page includes lefty-righty breakdowns for both pitchers and batters. The statistics are sorted by team. To skip ahead to a team, use your browser's FIND tool.
Atlanta Braves
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( AT) Clontz vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( AT) Clontz vs RH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( AT) Colbrunn vs LH .344 .602 .370 128 44 1 1 10 5 12 3 8.20
( AT) Colbrunn vs RH .264 .430 .302 440 116 17 1 18 21 63 13 4.45
( AT) Fletcher,D vs LH .250 .400 .318 20 5 3 0 0 1 4 1 3.92
( AT) Fletcher,D vs RH .301 .493 .369 306 92 15 1 14 31 35 13 6.20
( AT) Glavine vs LH .156 .156 .156 32 5 0 0 0 0 7 0 0.78
( AT) Glavine vs RH .326 .395 .385 43 14 0 0 1 4 6 0 6.53
( AT) Guillen vs LH .240 .340 .269 50 12 5 0 0 2 4 1 3.03
( AT) Guillen vs RH .233 .295 .256 193 45 10 1 0 7 18 3 2.39
( AT) Henneman vs LH 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 INF
( AT) Henneman vs RH .000 .000 .000 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( AT) Higginson vs LH .100 .200 .182 10 1 1 0 0 1 3 0 1.23
( AT) Higginson vs RH .233 .372 .327 86 20 2 2 2 12 29 0 4.50
( AT) Hunter,BL vs LH .245 .283 .317 53 13 2 0 0 6 6 0 2.97
( AT) Hunter,BL vs RH .278 .349 .323 284 79 12 4 0 17 60 2 4.39
( AT) Huson vs LH .286 .286 .375 7 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 5.63
( AT) Huson vs RH .279 .372 .315 129 36 5 2 1 5 17 4 3.86
( AT) Johnson,R vs LH .000 .000 .062 14 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0.09
( AT) Johnson,R vs RH .156 .178 .160 45 7 1 0 0 0 17 0 1.06
( AT) Jones,Chip vs LH .234 .449 .359 107 25 7 2 4 21 13 6 5.20
( AT) Jones,Chip vs RH .311 .582 .364 431 134 32 2 27 36 66 10 7.89
( AT) Justice vs LH .194 .484 .286 31 6 3 0 2 4 4 0 4.95
( AT) Justice vs RH .262 .548 .352 210 55 7 1 17 31 29 0 7.06
( AT) Listach vs LH .198 .221 .245 86 17 2 0 0 6 21 1 1.83
( AT) Listach vs RH .200 .250 .257 100 20 3 1 0 9 23 0 2.48
( AT) Lopez,J vs LH .263 .450 .298 171 45 3 1 9 9 32 10 3.84
( AT) Lopez,J vs RH .237 .311 .282 190 45 5 0 3 11 35 8 2.65
( AT) Mieske vs LH .269 .563 .367 119 32 2 0 11 18 14 3 7.42
( AT) Mieske vs RH .256 .282 .326 39 10 1 0 0 5 7 0 3.86
( AT) Miller vs LH .381 .492 .409 63 24 5 1 0 2 13 1 7.43
( AT) Miller vs RH .286 .417 .326 206 59 11 2 4 9 44 5 4.45
( AT) Mordecai vs LH .478 .739 .538 23 11 3 0 1 3 5 0 21.54
( AT) Mordecai vs RH .350 .750 .381 20 7 2 0 2 0 4 0 12.07
( AT) Myers,R vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( AT) Myers,R vs RH .200 .200 .167 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1.37
( AT) Nieves vs LH .202 .360 .265 89 18 2 0 4 6 28 2 2.97
( AT) Nieves vs RH .114 .205 .235 44 5 1 0 1 6 16 1 1.58
( AT) O'Neill vs LH .229 .300 .317 140 32 1 0 3 19 19 7 3.01
( AT) O'Neill vs RH .283 .474 .374 382 108 28 3 13 54 58 21 5.62
( AT) Paquette vs LH .238 .405 .267 42 10 1 0 2 2 19 0 3.94
( AT) Paquette vs RH .259 .434 .305 143 37 11 1 4 9 46 1 5.02
( AT) Perry,H vs LH .342 .521 .395 73 25 7 0 2 6 8 3 6.00
( AT) Perry,H vs RH .205 .318 .217 44 9 5 0 0 1 10 1 1.83
( AT) Reynoso vs LH .000 .000 .000 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( AT) Reynoso vs RH .143 .143 .167 14 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 1.15
( AT) Schmidt vs LH .143 .143 .143 7 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.64
( AT) Schmidt vs RH .000 .000 .000 15 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.00
( AT) Smoltz vs LH .053 .053 .091 19 1 0 0 0 1 9 0 0.28
( AT) Smoltz vs RH .122 .122 .192 41 5 0 0 0 4 18 0 1.16
( AT) Veras vs LH .324 .500 .462 136 44 11 2 3 31 19 3 9.83
( AT) Veras vs RH .236 .330 .364 267 63 13 3 2 51 48 0 4.90
( AT) Walton vs LH .455 .636 .600 11 5 2 0 0 4 1 0 23.11
( AT) Walton vs RH .125 .500 .111 8 1 0 0 1 0 2 0 1.89
( AT) Williams,Be vs LH .328 .534 .413 174 57 5 2 9 24 34 4 8.15
( AT) Williams,Be vs RH .303 .476 .390 290 88 11 6 9 38 50 2 7.52
( AT) Witt vs LH .000 .000 .105 17 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 0.09
( AT) Witt vs RH .057 .086 .093 35 2 1 0 0 2 14 0 0.41
Atlanta vs LH .268 .430 .341 1628 436 66 9 60 175 285 45 4.99
vs RH .264 .416 .326 4023 1062 193 30 119 363 731 85 4.76
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( AT) Borbon vs LH 24 5 0 3 7 .227 .308 .273 7.5 4.5 10.5
( AT) Borbon vs RH 58 19 1 1 14 .345 .368 .455 12.8 0.7 9.4
( AT) Casian vs LH 9 2 0 1 1 .222 .273 .333 6.8 3.4 3.4
( AT) Casian vs RH 33 7 0 6 3 .233 .333 .333 7.0 6.0 3.0
( AT) Clontz vs LH 82 23 4 4 17 .299 .329 .519 11.1 1.9 8.2
( AT) Clontz vs RH 96 24 2 6 19 .276 .330 .448 10.3 2.6 8.1
( AT) Florie vs LH 108 18 4 13 23 .194 .296 .355 6.1 4.4 7.8
( AT) Florie vs RH 132 30 4 15 19 .275 .380 .440 9.8 4.9 6.2
( AT) Glavine vs LH 212 37 0 21 35 .195 .272 .274 6.3 3.6 6.0
( AT) Glavine vs RH 832 164 15 80 120 .217 .290 .334 7.3 3.6 5.3
( AT) Henneman vs LH 62 13 0 6 7 .228 .303 .246 7.8 3.6 4.2
( AT) Henneman vs RH 78 12 0 5 22 .167 .218 .250 5.1 2.1 9.3
( AT) Jackson,M vs LH 75 16 3 9 14 .239 .321 .403 8.3 4.7 7.3
( AT) Jackson,M vs RH 91 14 4 13 17 .182 .297 .364 6.0 5.6 7.3
( AT) Johnson,R vs LH 193 33 4 16 53 .185 .251 .292 5.9 2.9 9.5
( AT) Johnson,R vs RH 854 160 14 56 272 .202 .258 .307 6.7 2.3 11.4
( AT) Myers,R vs LH 41 7 0 5 8 .194 .293 .250 6.1 4.4 7.0
( AT) Myers,R vs RH 142 27 6 18 35 .213 .304 .386 7.3 4.9 9.4
( AT) Reynoso vs LH 187 60 4 17 11 .361 .426 .500 14.9 4.2 2.7
( AT) Reynoso vs RH 194 46 6 20 25 .275 .365 .431 9.9 4.3 5.4
( AT) Ryan vs LH 55 14 1 3 14 .269 .305 .481 9.7 2.1 9.7
( AT) Ryan vs RH 55 15 1 5 12 .306 .364 .429 10.9 3.6 8.8
( AT) Schmidt vs LH 227 57 3 21 32 .279 .355 .402 10.2 3.8 5.7
( AT) Schmidt vs RH 289 73 2 32 44 .281 .353 .385 10.2 4.5 6.1
( AT) Smoltz vs LH 485 103 4 50 117 .237 .314 .308 8.2 4.0 9.3
( AT) Smoltz vs RH 558 113 13 40 123 .218 .274 .344 7.2 2.6 7.9
( AT) Witt vs LH 443 110 8 40 85 .269 .328 .389 9.6 3.5 7.4
( AT) Witt vs RH 541 112 10 48 111 .228 .296 .360 7.8 3.3 7.7
Atlanta vs LH 2236 504 35 210 433 .249 .318 .358 8.7 3.6 7.4
vs RH 3977 822 81 349 841 .228 .297 .354 7.7 3.3 7.9
Chicago Cubs
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( CH) Arias vs LH .158 .211 .273 19 3 1 0 0 2 3 0 2.44
( CH) Arias vs RH .238 .347 .313 101 24 3 1 2 10 13 3 3.75
( CH) Bones vs LH .059 .118 .053 17 1 1 0 0 0 5 0 0.24
( CH) Bones vs RH .088 .118 .122 34 3 1 0 0 2 12 1 0.51
( CH) Borders vs LH .258 .468 .324 62 16 3 2 2 6 11 4 4.01
( CH) Borders vs RH .184 .263 .205 38 7 3 0 0 1 6 0 1.83
( CH) Bullinger vs LH .200 .400 .333 5 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 5.09
( CH) Bullinger vs RH .125 .125 .125 8 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.48
( CH) Butler vs LH .412 .647 .500 17 7 1 0 1 3 2 0 16.60
( CH) Butler vs RH .289 .345 .377 426 123 12 6 0 61 44 4 5.37
( CH) Castillo,F vs LH .125 .125 .222 8 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 1.08
( CH) Castillo,F vs RH .027 .027 .070 37 1 0 0 0 2 21 0 0.17
( CH) Charlton vs LH ---- ---- 1.000 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 INF
( CH) Charlton vs RH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( CH) Devereaux vs LH .278 .407 .318 162 45 7 1 4 9 33 6 3.91
( CH) Devereaux vs RH .230 .352 .286 122 28 6 0 3 9 28 5 2.97
( CH) Fielder vs LH .151 .419 .247 86 13 2 0 7 10 24 2 2.91
( CH) Fielder vs RH .273 .454 .357 194 53 8 0 9 27 37 12 5.05
( CH) Girardi vs LH .375 .375 .417 32 12 0 0 0 3 5 2 4.89
( CH) Girardi vs RH .232 .308 .319 224 52 5 0 4 28 39 6 3.21
( CH) Hammond vs LH .333 .417 .353 12 4 1 0 0 2 3 0 6.13
( CH) Hammond vs RH .333 .400 .300 15 5 1 0 0 1 5 0 4.83
( CH) Henderson vs LH .296 .452 .406 135 40 10 1 3 24 24 3 7.48
( CH) Henderson vs RH .256 .382 .381 317 81 25 0 5 63 63 5 5.74
( CH) Hubbard,T vs LH .455 .667 .526 33 15 4 0 1 5 4 1 16.92
( CH) Hubbard,T vs RH .290 .613 .371 31 9 1 0 3 4 6 1 8.07
( CH) Hudler vs LH .304 .570 .382 79 24 3 0 6 7 22 0 9.12
( CH) Hudler vs RH .213 .320 .224 75 16 2 0 2 1 16 0 2.54
( CH) Johnson,C vs LH .185 .259 .333 54 10 4 0 0 12 17 1 3.22
( CH) Johnson,C vs RH .234 .426 .314 188 44 4 1 10 21 40 9 3.92
( CH) Mouton,L vs LH .082 .102 .164 49 4 1 0 0 5 18 1 0.57
( CH) Mouton,L vs RH .290 .471 .376 155 45 13 0 5 21 38 4 6.61
( CH) Navarro vs LH .077 .077 .143 13 1 0 0 0 1 6 0 0.40
( CH) Navarro vs RH .186 .279 .191 43 8 4 0 0 0 17 0 1.88
( CH) Plesac vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( CH) Plesac vs RH ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( CH) Reed,Jo vs LH .294 .373 .368 51 15 2 1 0 6 5 2 4.75
( CH) Reed,Jo vs RH .238 .297 .321 185 44 5 0 2 22 13 3 3.44
( CH) Rodriguez,H vs LH .667 .667 .667 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.00
( CH) Rodriguez,H vs RH .277 .394 .320 94 26 3 1 2 5 17 6 3.45
( CH) Sanchez vs LH .300 .467 .382 30 9 3 1 0 3 7 1 6.40
( CH) Sanchez vs RH .240 .312 .276 192 46 12 1 0 10 27 6 2.74
( CH) Segui vs LH .245 .288 .303 139 34 4 1 0 12 18 2 3.06
( CH) Segui vs RH .296 .463 .348 324 96 13 1 13 23 42 5 5.39
( CH) Sosa vs LH .230 .391 .298 174 40 7 0 7 17 45 4 3.89
( CH) Sosa vs RH .237 .415 .317 472 112 10 4 22 52 127 9 4.51
( CH) Sprague vs LH .196 .345 .314 148 29 10 0 4 23 27 7 3.30
( CH) Sprague vs RH .212 .362 .283 458 97 18 0 17 35 93 18 3.08
( CH) Trachsel vs LH .333 .333 .333 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4.50
( CH) Trachsel vs RH .100 .150 .100 20 2 1 0 0 0 9 0 0.45
( CH) Vizquel vs LH .242 .337 .283 178 43 8 0 3 11 19 1 3.41
( CH) Vizquel vs RH .220 .284 .290 387 85 22 0 1 38 56 1 3.07
Chicago vs LH .245 .378 .321 1511 370 73 7 38 164 303 37 4.14
vs RH .243 .364 .317 4146 1008 172 15 100 436 775 98 3.95
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( CH) Bones vs LH 479 125 7 46 42 .288 .356 .399 10.3 3.8 3.4
( CH) Bones vs RH 478 102 14 43 54 .233 .298 .393 7.7 3.2 4.1
( CH) Bullinger vs LH 219 69 6 24 21 .358 .429 .523 14.0 4.9 4.3
( CH) Bullinger vs RH 228 57 5 21 35 .279 .347 .422 9.9 3.7 6.1
( CH) Castillo,F vs LH 480 119 20 29 93 .263 .305 .435 9.3 2.3 7.3
( CH) Castillo,F vs RH 459 110 15 26 95 .255 .297 .444 9.2 2.2 7.9
( CH) Charlton vs LH 100 15 2 8 25 .165 .230 .286 4.9 2.6 8.2
( CH) Charlton vs RH 288 47 5 38 73 .190 .304 .312 6.1 5.0 9.5
( CH) Franco vs LH 73 11 1 7 11 .167 .247 .242 4.9 3.1 4.9
( CH) Franco vs RH 209 55 4 17 40 .289 .349 .479 10.2 3.2 7.4
( CH) Hammond vs LH 138 23 0 8 27 .180 .246 .234 5.6 2.0 6.6
( CH) Hammond vs RH 604 146 25 32 133 .257 .307 .436 9.0 2.0 8.2
( CH) Helling vs LH 4 1 0 2 0 .500 .750 .500 27.0 54.0 0.0
( CH) Helling vs RH 2 1 0 0 0 .333 .250 .333 13.5 0.0 0.0
( CH) James,M vs LH 127 22 2 13 25 .193 .269 .281 6.3 3.7 7.1
( CH) James,M vs RH 149 26 7 9 23 .191 .250 .390 5.9 2.0 5.2
( CH) Karchner vs LH 85 25 0 8 14 .329 .395 .421 12.7 4.1 7.1
( CH) Karchner vs RH 78 18 1 8 16 .265 .359 .382 9.0 4.0 8.0
( CH) Navarro vs LH 409 116 17 22 61 .301 .337 .514 11.1 2.1 5.8
( CH) Navarro vs RH 508 123 16 31 89 .262 .311 .433 9.0 2.3 6.5
( CH) Plesac vs LH 76 16 1 8 13 .239 .333 .358 8.2 4.1 6.6
( CH) Plesac vs RH 166 38 1 16 29 .255 .320 .336 8.9 3.8 6.8
( CH) Rodriguez,F vs LH 1 0 0 0 1 .000 .000 .000 0.0 0.0 27.0
( CH) Rodriguez,F vs RH 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 0.0 0.0 0.0
( CH) Slocumb vs LH 189 52 1 18 31 .304 .366 .368 11.1 3.8 6.6
( CH) Slocumb vs RH 222 43 2 26 45 .219 .305 .337 7.3 4.4 7.6
( CH) Thomas,L vs LH 19 1 0 0 7 .053 .053 .105 1.4 0.0 9.9
( CH) Thomas,L vs RH 33 2 1 5 13 .071 .212 .179 2.0 5.0 13.0
( CH) Trachsel vs LH 187 44 8 26 28 .273 .376 .497 9.7 5.7 6.1
( CH) Trachsel vs RH 174 42 9 12 39 .251 .290 .491 8.5 2.4 7.9
( CH) Wendell vs LH 40 10 2 9 6 .323 .475 .548 12.3 11.0 7.4
( CH) Wendell vs RH 50 10 1 5 10 .227 .300 .364 7.5 3.8 7.5
Chicago vs LH 2626 649 67 228 405 .271 .335 .415 9.5 3.4 6.0
vs RH 3651 821 106 289 694 .246 .307 .410 8.4 3.0 7.1
New York Mets
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( NM) Alfonzo vs LH .143 .143 .333 7 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 2.28
( NM) Alfonzo vs RH .133 .267 .133 15 2 0 1 0 0 3 1 0.51
( NM) Belle vs LH .328 .557 .414 174 57 25 0 5 24 24 11 7.12
( NM) Belle vs RH .267 .619 .365 423 113 32 0 39 55 84 14 7.72
( NM) Bogar vs LH .280 .280 .286 25 7 0 0 0 1 2 0 3.20
( NM) Bogar vs RH .263 .322 .323 118 31 7 0 0 12 17 1 3.97
( NM) Dunston vs LH .316 .448 .339 174 55 10 2 3 8 29 5 5.47
( NM) Dunston vs RH .304 .479 .325 355 108 25 2 11 12 64 7 5.68
( NM) Edmonds vs LH .284 .495 .339 218 62 14 1 10 16 53 3 6.11
( NM) Edmonds vs RH .296 .516 .360 459 136 30 1 23 40 103 12 6.65
( NM) Erickson vs LH .091 .091 .083 11 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 0.31
( NM) Erickson vs RH .000 .000 .000 14 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.00
( NM) Espinoza vs LH .211 .237 .319 38 8 1 0 0 5 1 1 2.61
( NM) Espinoza vs RH .333 .354 .333 48 16 1 0 0 1 1 2 3.77
( NM) Gilkey vs LH .353 .612 .418 116 41 13 1 5 13 19 5 9.17
( NM) Gilkey vs RH .287 .403 .336 129 37 10 1 1 9 18 3 4.87
( NM) Hampton vs LH .000 .000 .500 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3.51
( NM) Hampton vs RH .000 .000 .100 9 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0.08
( NM) Isringh'sen vs LH 1.000 2.000 1.000 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 INF
( NM) Isringh'sen vs RH .000 .000 .286 5 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0.80
( NM) Jones,B vs LH .111 .111 .100 9 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.46
( NM) Jones,B vs RH .143 .143 .167 21 3 0 0 0 1 9 0 0.97
( NM) Knoblauch vs LH .299 .497 .389 197 59 16 1 7 27 28 7 6.96
( NM) Knoblauch vs RH .302 .415 .387 463 140 29 7 3 55 82 11 6.28
( NM) Martinez,T vs LH .251 .503 .335 183 46 10 0 12 23 35 4 5.89
( NM) Martinez,T vs RH .339 .573 .388 431 146 39 1 20 32 87 10 8.44
( NM) Mayne vs LH .333 .333 .333 15 5 0 0 0 0 1 3 1.38
( NM) Mayne vs RH .223 .255 .259 157 35 5 0 0 6 17 11 1.66
( NM) Naehring vs LH .297 .457 .372 138 41 11 1 3 17 24 5 6.00
( NM) Naehring vs RH .260 .382 .365 346 90 18 0 8 56 61 11 4.62
( NM) O'Leary vs LH .385 .462 .385 13 5 1 0 0 0 1 1 5.54
( NM) O'Leary vs RH .337 .601 .390 193 65 13 4 10 16 35 3 8.78
( NM) Pulsipher vs LH .000 .000 .000 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( NM) Pulsipher vs RH .000 .000 .100 6 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0.55
( NM) Ritz vs LH .250 .250 .200 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.00
( NM) Ritz vs RH .304 .304 .308 23 7 0 0 0 0 9 0 2.75
( NM) Sanders,R vs LH .304 .560 .392 191 58 12 2 11 27 44 3 8.28
( NM) Sanders,R vs RH .310 .595 .398 422 131 32 8 24 59 89 10 8.79
( NM) Silvestri vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( NM) Silvestri vs RH ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( NM) Thompson,R vs LH .214 .286 .312 14 3 1 0 0 2 4 0 2.54
( NM) Thompson,R vs RH .250 .250 .250 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2.25
( NM) Valle vs LH .176 .176 .300 17 3 0 0 0 2 4 1 1.70
( NM) Valle vs RH .280 .400 .345 25 7 3 0 0 1 5 0 4.73
( NM) Williams,Mi vs LH 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 INF
( NM) Williams,Mi vs RH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( NM) Wilson,D vs LH .239 .373 .264 134 32 6 3 2 4 20 3 3.23
( NM) Wilson,D vs RH .257 .362 .316 257 66 14 2 3 24 47 11 3.65
New York (NL) vs LH .290 .477 .357 1688 489 121 11 58 172 303 54 5.88
vs RH .288 .475 .355 3941 1135 258 27 142 386 754 107 5.94
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( NM) Aguilera vs LH 111 24 4 8 24 .238 .300 .386 8.4 2.8 8.4
( NM) Aguilera vs RH 129 28 3 4 33 .224 .252 .336 7.6 1.1 9.0
( NM) Bielecki vs LH 15 6 1 0 2 .333 .286 .611 12.5 0.0 4.2
( NM) Bielecki vs RH 30 12 2 5 2 .480 .562 .760 19.1 7.9 3.2
( NM) Byrd vs LH 10 1 0 2 1 .125 .300 .125 3.9 7.7 3.9
( NM) Byrd vs RH 19 6 2 2 3 .353 .421 .882 13.5 4.5 6.8
( NM) Erickson vs LH 559 151 17 62 61 .306 .384 .513 11.0 4.5 4.5
( NM) Erickson vs RH 530 128 12 53 74 .271 .343 .409 9.3 3.8 5.4
( NM) Hampton vs LH 100 23 0 6 19 .240 .279 .281 8.0 2.1 6.6
( NM) Hampton vs RH 569 123 20 48 92 .238 .308 .403 8.1 3.2 6.1
( NM) Henry,D vs LH 84 14 3 6 15 .182 .241 .312 6.0 2.6 6.4
( NM) Henry,D vs RH 125 13 2 6 38 .110 .159 .169 3.2 1.5 9.4
( NM) Isringh'sen vs LH 238 59 5 25 23 .278 .354 .415 10.1 4.3 3.9
( NM) Isringh'sen vs RH 228 53 5 22 30 .255 .322 .394 8.8 3.7 5.0
( NM) Jones,B vs LH 540 123 18 37 86 .247 .308 .406 8.7 2.6 6.1
( NM) Jones,B vs RH 484 112 8 29 74 .243 .287 .354 8.2 2.1 5.4
( NM) Mathews,Te vs LH 98 22 1 9 22 .253 .330 .299 8.7 3.6 8.7
( NM) Mathews,Te vs RH 125 23 4 7 30 .193 .237 .319 6.0 1.8 7.9
( NM) Pulsipher vs LH 90 22 0 6 13 .262 .315 .345 9.0 2.5 5.3
( NM) Pulsipher vs RH 499 112 8 43 75 .248 .323 .373 8.5 3.3 5.7
( NM) Ritz vs LH 484 90 9 48 64 .206 .287 .333 6.5 3.5 4.6
( NM) Ritz vs RH 397 79 7 32 73 .215 .278 .326 6.9 2.8 6.3
( NM) Stanton vs LH 46 11 2 0 4 .234 .229 .362 8.0 0.0 2.9
( NM) Stanton vs RH 63 18 2 8 7 .333 .419 .500 14.7 6.5 5.7
( NM) Telgheder vs LH 31 6 0 1 6 .200 .226 .333 6.8 1.1 6.8
( NM) Telgheder vs RH 27 7 0 0 5 .250 .241 .286 8.6 0.0 6.1
( NM) Torres,S vs LH 25 4 2 4 3 .182 .296 .455 6.0 6.0 4.5
( NM) Torres,S vs RH 19 4 2 3 1 .235 .333 .588 9.0 6.8 2.2
( NM) Valenzuela vs LH 19 6 0 3 0 .375 .474 .375 16.2 8.1 0.0
( NM) Valenzuela vs RH 32 6 1 6 9 .240 .387 .400 8.1 8.1 12.1
( NM) Wickander vs LH 36 5 0 1 5 .143 .167 .143 4.4 0.9 4.4
( NM) Wickander vs RH 36 4 0 4 6 .129 .250 .129 3.9 3.9 5.8
( NM) Williams,Mi vs LH 115 24 3 12 19 .233 .316 .350 7.4 3.7 5.9
( NM) Williams,Mi vs RH 98 29 5 6 17 .315 .360 .533 12.0 2.5 7.1
New York (NL) vs LH 2601 591 65 230 367 .250 .319 .393 8.6 3.3 5.3
vs RH 3416 761 85 278 570 .243 .306 .379 8.2 3.0 6.2
Philadelphia Phillies
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( PH) Ayala vs LH ---- ---- .000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( PH) Ayala vs RH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( PH) Bichette vs LH .272 .515 .302 136 37 6 0 9 8 11 4 5.19
( PH) Bichette vs RH .338 .578 .365 225 76 15 0 13 11 24 5 7.85
( PH) Blair vs LH .000 .000 .000 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.00
( PH) Blair vs RH .000 .000 .067 11 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0.23
( PH) Carr vs LH .319 .407 .368 91 29 2 0 2 10 12 0 6.45
( PH) Carr vs RH .252 .327 .296 107 27 8 0 0 10 20 1 4.04
( PH) Cirillo vs LH .205 .356 .301 73 15 4 2 1 9 16 3 3.32
( PH) Cirillo vs RH .282 .435 .388 124 35 13 0 2 22 8 2 6.79
( PH) Clark,D vs LH .182 .236 .246 55 10 3 0 0 5 9 4 1.29
( PH) Clark,D vs RH .238 .333 .333 105 25 4 0 2 13 15 11 2.49
( PH) Curtis vs LH .295 .492 .358 122 36 7 1 5 10 19 1 6.42
( PH) Curtis vs RH .227 .350 .285 366 83 16 1 9 30 74 7 3.02
( PH) Davis,R vs LH .308 .538 .357 13 4 0 0 1 1 3 0 7.78
( PH) Davis,R vs RH .244 .415 .295 41 10 2 1 1 3 14 0 4.51
( PH) DeShields vs LH .286 .619 .400 21 6 2 1 1 4 2 0 8.53
( PH) DeShields vs RH .280 .402 .373 246 69 16 1 4 37 44 2 5.77
( PH) Fabregas vs LH .250 .250 .261 20 5 0 0 0 1 4 0 2.05
( PH) Fabregas vs RH .185 .204 .215 108 20 2 0 0 5 12 4 1.34
( PH) Fernandez,T vs LH .206 .235 .250 34 7 1 0 0 2 4 0 1.94
( PH) Fernandez,T vs RH .285 .399 .349 158 45 7 1 3 13 12 0 5.43
( PH) Foster vs LH .308 .308 .308 13 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 3.69
( PH) Foster vs RH .192 .538 .226 26 5 0 0 3 2 5 0 4.35
( PH) Grace,Mi vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( PH) Grace,Mi vs RH .250 .250 .200 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( PH) Hayes vs LH .244 .333 .302 78 19 4 0 1 7 18 3 3.25
( PH) Hayes vs RH .283 .443 .356 212 60 13 0 7 21 36 11 5.07
( PH) Hershiser vs LH .200 .200 .200 10 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.60
( PH) Hershiser vs RH .000 .000 .000 10 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( PH) Karros vs LH .343 .597 .416 134 46 5 1 9 16 27 0 10.56
( PH) Karros vs RH .286 .502 .365 255 73 14 1 13 29 51 10 5.89
( PH) Lewis,M vs LH .318 .500 .352 66 21 5 2 1 4 12 2 4.80
( PH) Lewis,M vs RH .248 .411 .315 129 32 13 1 2 13 34 0 4.77
( PH) McCarty vs LH .296 .370 .387 27 8 2 0 0 4 8 2 4.58
( PH) McCarty vs RH .250 .344 .273 32 8 3 0 0 1 11 0 2.95
( PH) Merced vs LH .274 .368 .389 95 26 9 0 0 18 10 4 5.26
( PH) Merced vs RH .298 .465 .356 325 97 21 3 9 30 62 6 5.72
( PH) Morandini vs LH .306 .500 .395 36 11 4 0 1 4 7 0 8.24
( PH) Morandini vs RH .253 .338 .316 225 57 15 2 0 15 31 4 3.66
( PH) Neagle vs LH .000 .000 .000 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( PH) Neagle vs RH .107 .143 .235 28 3 1 0 0 3 9 0 1.42
( PH) Ontiveros vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( PH) Ontiveros vs RH .053 .053 .095 19 1 0 0 0 1 9 0 0.24
( PH) Plunk vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( PH) Plunk vs RH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( PH) Rapp vs LH .000 .000 .000 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( PH) Rapp vs RH .125 .125 .100 16 2 0 0 0 0 7 0 0.61
( PH) Saberhagen vs LH .000 .000 .125 6 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0.38
( PH) Saberhagen vs RH .143 .143 .182 28 4 0 0 0 2 11 0 0.89
( PH) Santiago vs LH .393 .690 .457 84 33 10 0 5 6 12 3 12.89
( PH) Santiago vs RH .284 .503 .353 169 48 13 0 8 17 28 7 6.04
( PH) Seitzer vs LH .278 .342 .348 79 22 3 1 0 9 12 2 4.19
( PH) Seitzer vs RH .321 .462 .382 346 111 29 4 4 35 39 9 6.58
( PH) Stocker vs LH .156 .188 .234 64 10 2 0 0 6 15 1 1.66
( PH) Stocker vs RH .216 .275 .269 171 37 6 2 0 17 27 2 2.83
( PH) Tavarez,Je vs LH .250 .312 .314 32 8 2 0 0 3 7 0 3.02
( PH) Tavarez,Je vs RH .289 .337 .366 166 48 4 2 0 19 22 0 5.18
( PH) Timmons vs LH .341 .636 .383 44 15 4 0 3 3 5 2 9.00
( PH) Timmons vs RH .241 .519 .294 79 19 6 2 4 5 14 5 4.26
( PH) Trammell vs LH .317 .350 .359 60 19 2 0 0 4 3 0 5.59
( PH) Trammell vs RH .207 .299 .260 87 18 2 0 2 6 8 0 2.83
( PH) Vina vs LH .222 .244 .288 45 10 1 0 0 7 9 1 3.08
( PH) Vina vs RH .220 .303 .282 109 24 5 2 0 11 13 0 3.37
( PH) Walbeck vs LH .246 .319 .297 69 17 5 0 0 5 9 0 3.56
( PH) Walbeck vs RH .228 .234 .271 145 33 1 0 0 9 25 4 2.09
( PH) Young,Eri vs LH .341 .439 .401 123 42 5 2 1 12 10 2 6.43
( PH) Young,Eri vs RH .236 .310 .326 271 64 12 4 0 30 31 5 3.51
Philadephia vs LH .278 .419 .341 1555 432 82 7 41 153 245 31 5.12
vs RH .258 .392 .323 3934 1015 232 24 82 375 651 84 4.37
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( PH) Andujar vs LH 84 10 1 10 6 .139 .253 .222 4.4 4.4 2.6
( PH) Andujar vs RH 95 15 0 7 8 .174 .253 .186 5.4 2.5 2.9
( PH) Ayala vs LH 115 27 3 9 23 .265 .330 .422 9.6 3.2 8.2
( PH) Ayala vs RH 147 30 11 11 38 .226 .288 .511 7.6 2.8 9.7
( PH) Blair vs LH 238 55 11 25 35 .261 .339 .502 9.1 4.1 5.8
( PH) Blair vs RH 269 53 7 28 51 .228 .318 .379 7.5 3.9 7.2
( PH) Foster vs LH 455 119 28 51 70 .303 .383 .573 11.4 4.9 6.7
( PH) Foster vs RH 403 81 19 50 71 .233 .328 .425 7.7 4.8 6.8
( PH) Frey vs LH 37 12 0 4 2 .375 .444 .562 14.1 4.7 2.3
( PH) Frey vs RH 99 21 1 11 10 .250 .330 .345 8.1 4.2 3.9
( PH) Grace,Mi vs LH 46 13 0 7 5 .333 .435 .462 12.5 6.8 4.8
( PH) Grace,Mi vs RH 46 9 0 4 6 .220 .304 .244 6.4 2.8 4.3
( PH) Hershiser vs LH 434 108 14 33 65 .273 .329 .452 9.6 2.9 5.8
( PH) Hershiser vs RH 418 93 14 37 62 .249 .325 .402 8.6 3.4 5.8
( PH) Minor vs LH 109 33 3 3 18 .314 .330 .486 12.0 1.1 6.6
( PH) Minor vs RH 131 30 3 10 29 .254 .312 .356 8.9 3.0 8.6
( PH) Neagle vs LH 163 33 3 9 28 .217 .265 .303 7.3 2.0 6.2
( PH) Neagle vs RH 750 198 20 56 128 .289 .342 .447 10.5 3.0 6.8
( PH) Ontiveros vs LH 176 41 3 12 24 .253 .307 .352 8.9 2.6 5.2
( PH) Ontiveros vs RH 176 41 2 11 35 .248 .295 .382 8.9 2.4 7.6
( PH) Plunk vs LH 142 16 2 20 39 .134 .257 .202 4.0 5.0 9.8
( PH) Plunk vs RH 185 30 2 17 49 .190 .281 .278 6.1 3.5 10.0
( PH) Rapp vs LH 391 105 4 44 47 .302 .375 .440 11.2 4.7 5.0
( PH) Rapp vs RH 433 94 8 48 65 .249 .339 .397 8.4 4.3 5.8
( PH) Saberhagen vs LH 316 89 14 19 50 .307 .356 .507 11.3 2.4 6.4
( PH) Saberhagen vs RH 352 87 14 16 74 .268 .311 .455 9.5 1.7 8.1
( PH) Shaw vs LH 87 24 2 9 10 .300 .359 .400 11.0 4.1 4.6
( PH) Shaw vs RH 96 26 5 12 11 .313 .396 .542 11.5 5.3 4.9
( PH) Veres,R vs LH 80 20 2 7 10 .278 .342 .431 10.4 3.6 5.2
( PH) Veres,R vs RH 66 14 1 5 15 .233 .294 .317 7.6 2.7 8.1
Philadephia vs LH 2708 675 88 236 410 .277 .341 .455 9.9 3.5 6.0
vs RH 3545 798 109 312 635 .252 .323 .412 8.6 3.4 6.9
Seattle Mariners
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( SE) Amaral vs LH .276 .419 .315 105 29 5 2 2 5 13 2 4.12
( SE) Amaral vs RH .255 .404 .307 94 24 12 1 0 7 18 2 4.14
( SE) Becker vs LH .212 .212 .289 33 7 0 0 0 4 8 1 2.17
( SE) Becker vs RH .229 .321 .279 109 25 7 0 1 8 23 6 2.33
( SE) Boone vs LH .284 .466 .331 116 33 8 2 3 7 16 4 5.26
( SE) Boone vs RH .261 .424 .318 314 82 22 1 9 24 32 10 4.50
( SE) Bragg vs LH .000 .000 .167 5 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0.23
( SE) Bragg vs RH .203 .291 .276 158 32 5 0 3 12 35 4 2.93
( SE) Cummings,J vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( SE) Cummings,J vs RH ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( SE) Everett vs LH .213 .356 .288 160 34 11 0 4 17 32 6 3.06
( SE) Everett vs RH .269 .441 .362 186 50 11 0 7 25 34 6 5.44
( SE) Gagne vs LH .239 .342 .270 155 37 8 1 2 6 30 4 2.91
( SE) Gagne vs RH .261 .400 .305 380 99 21 7 6 27 54 5 4.23
( SE) Griffey vs LH .205 .230 .322 122 25 3 0 0 21 22 4 2.63
( SE) Griffey vs RH .228 .437 .362 263 60 4 0 17 56 61 8 5.58
( SE) Gutierrez vs LH .245 .284 .287 102 25 4 0 0 6 23 4 2.50
( SE) Gutierrez vs RH .233 .333 .233 30 7 3 0 0 0 11 0 2.25
( SE) Hansen vs LH .100 .150 .182 20 2 1 0 0 2 3 0 0.89
( SE) Hansen vs RH .237 .275 .309 160 38 6 0 0 17 26 4 2.97
( SE) Huskey vs LH .229 .486 .289 35 8 0 0 3 3 7 0 5.15
( SE) Huskey vs RH .143 .367 .208 49 7 2 0 3 4 10 0 2.54
( SE) Johnson,M vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( SE) Johnson,M vs RH .667 .667 .667 3 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 36.00
( SE) Karkovice vs LH .172 .345 .234 58 10 1 0 3 4 13 2 2.20
( SE) Karkovice vs RH .170 .286 .285 147 25 3 1 4 21 40 1 3.06
( SE) Klesko vs LH .179 .304 .319 56 10 4 0 1 12 16 3 3.07
( SE) Klesko vs RH .317 .644 .403 404 128 43 4 27 53 79 12 9.09
( SE) Lansing vs LH .181 .347 .221 72 13 2 2 2 4 9 3 2.19
( SE) Lansing vs RH .298 .472 .358 161 48 16 0 4 12 21 8 5.22
( SE) Martinez,E vs LH .353 .545 .466 156 55 12 0 6 32 30 4 10.58
( SE) Martinez,E vs RH .309 .567 .424 337 104 30 0 19 61 64 7 9.52
( SE) Mercker vs LH .222 .333 .200 9 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 2.38
( SE) Mercker vs RH .214 .429 .176 14 3 3 0 0 0 5 0 2.57
( SE) Newfield vs LH .286 .286 .286 7 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 3.09
( SE) Newfield vs RH .300 .500 .300 10 3 2 0 0 0 2 0 5.79
( SE) Oliver,J vs LH .286 .448 .374 105 30 2 0 5 15 27 10 4.74
( SE) Oliver,J vs RH .219 .343 .277 251 55 7 0 8 18 43 11 2.76
( SE) Raines vs LH .268 .345 .366 168 45 8 1 1 25 15 2 5.08
( SE) Raines vs RH .287 .423 .371 421 121 27 3 8 51 49 7 6.09
( SE) Rodriguez,A vs LH .121 .152 .147 33 4 1 0 0 1 13 0 0.79
( SE) Rodriguez,A vs RH .164 .343 .243 67 11 1 1 3 4 20 0 2.88
( SE) Sorrento vs LH .135 .243 .238 37 5 1 0 1 5 6 3 1.32
( SE) Sorrento vs RH .232 .471 .360 293 68 13 0 19 59 63 15 5.46
( SE) Sparks vs LH .000 .000 .000 13 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.00
( SE) Sparks vs RH .154 .154 .200 13 2 0 0 0 1 6 1 0.77
( SE) Stottlemyre vs LH .000 .000 .000 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.00
( SE) Stottlemyre vs RH .133 .133 .176 15 2 0 0 0 1 9 0 0.95
Seattle vs LH .238 .357 .314 1579 376 72 8 33 170 298 52 3.69
vs RH .255 .431 .338 3915 999 238 18 138 461 715 107 5.00
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( SE) Acevedo vs LH 19 4 2 2 3 .235 .316 .588 7.7 3.9 5.8
( SE) Acevedo vs RH 9 3 0 1 2 .375 .444 .500 20.2 6.8 13.5
( SE) Anderson,Bri vs LH 12 4 2 2 1 .400 .500 1.100 18.0 9.0 4.5
( SE) Anderson,Bri vs RH 37 12 3 1 2 .343 .378 .629 13.0 1.1 2.2
( SE) Cook vs LH 18 3 0 1 2 .188 .278 .250 5.8 1.9 3.9
( SE) Cook vs RH 77 20 2 3 15 .274 .304 .384 9.0 1.4 6.8
( SE) Corsi vs LH 81 20 0 9 13 .282 .363 .366 10.0 4.5 6.5
( SE) Corsi vs RH 114 17 0 11 13 .170 .252 .240 5.1 3.3 3.9
( SE) Cummings,J vs LH 60 19 1 5 8 .345 .400 .491 13.5 3.6 5.7
( SE) Cummings,J vs RH 130 40 7 7 14 .333 .366 .583 12.7 2.2 4.4
( SE) Guzman vs LH 316 68 5 29 45 .239 .307 .361 8.2 3.5 5.4
( SE) Guzman vs RH 400 100 8 39 50 .279 .349 .423 10.0 3.9 5.0
( SE) Leskanic vs LH 230 59 3 17 50 .280 .336 .398 10.1 2.9 8.5
( SE) Leskanic vs RH 269 57 6 19 68 .232 .286 .358 7.7 2.6 9.1
( SE) Lira vs LH 375 101 6 39 39 .301 .375 .457 10.8 4.2 4.2
( SE) Lira vs RH 412 103 20 32 74 .280 .356 .522 10.0 3.1 7.2
( SE) Maddux,M vs LH 54 11 1 3 3 .220 .255 .340 7.2 2.0 2.0
( SE) Maddux,M vs RH 97 22 2 6 16 .265 .326 .361 8.6 2.3 6.3
( SE) Mercker vs LH 154 30 2 16 20 .222 .295 .326 7.1 3.8 4.7
( SE) Mercker vs RH 740 182 26 69 118 .272 .338 .451 9.7 3.7 6.3
( SE) Nelson vs LH 220 43 1 18 48 .222 .305 .304 7.5 3.2 8.4
( SE) Nelson vs RH 258 49 6 22 67 .217 .294 .354 6.9 3.1 9.4
( SE) Sparks vs LH 487 118 5 50 49 .271 .345 .385 9.6 4.1 4.0
( SE) Sparks vs RH 509 111 12 62 62 .255 .345 .418 8.6 4.8 4.8
( SE) Stottlemyre vs LH 452 116 18 30 92 .276 .324 .476 10.0 2.6 7.9
( SE) Stottlemyre vs RH 482 122 15 33 127 .275 .331 .437 10.0 2.7 10.4
( SE) Wohlers vs LH 100 24 0 8 22 .264 .320 .319 9.5 3.2 8.7
( SE) Wohlers vs RH 101 16 0 12 35 .188 .286 .282 6.0 4.5 13.1
( SE) Wolcott vs LH 37 9 1 4 4 .273 .351 .515 10.1 4.5 4.5
( SE) Wolcott vs RH 45 13 2 2 4 .317 .341 .512 13.0 2.0 4.0
Seattle vs LH 2615 629 47 233 399 .267 .333 .404 9.4 3.5 6.0
vs RH 3680 867 109 319 667 .263 .331 .429 9.2 3.4 7.0
Baltimore Orioles
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( BA) Alexander vs LH .240 .240 .321 25 6 0 0 0 3 2 0 2.82
( BA) Alexander vs RH .207 .241 .233 29 6 1 0 0 1 4 0 2.13
( BA) Baines vs LH .195 .322 .285 118 23 9 0 2 15 19 5 2.73
( BA) Baines vs RH .278 .414 .342 237 66 11 0 7 23 32 5 4.96
( BA) Bautista,D vs LH .277 .446 .327 101 28 5 0 4 7 24 1 5.12
( BA) Bautista,D vs RH .171 .197 .193 193 33 5 0 0 5 50 7 1.02
( BA) Bell,Jay vs LH .281 .461 .350 178 50 11 0 7 18 33 3 5.73
( BA) Bell,Jay vs RH .258 .377 .315 329 85 19 4 4 25 57 5 3.80
( BA) Buford vs LH .221 .234 .358 77 17 1 0 0 11 16 2 3.12
( BA) Buford vs RH .100 .150 .200 40 4 2 0 0 4 11 1 0.95
( BA) Carrasco vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( BA) Carrasco vs RH .500 .500 .500 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.50
( BA) Castilla vs LH .354 .636 .398 198 70 7 2 15 15 28 0 9.86
( BA) Castilla vs RH .284 .541 .326 412 117 19 3 27 26 64 15 5.40
( BA) Cianfrocco vs LH .286 .476 .348 21 6 1 0 1 2 2 0 6.59
( BA) Cianfrocco vs RH .288 .458 .323 59 17 4 0 2 1 15 0 5.45
( BA) Conine vs LH .260 .514 .358 173 45 12 1 10 27 29 0 7.10
( BA) Conine vs RH .261 .433 .344 337 88 18 2 12 43 69 8 5.21
( BA) Cormier vs LH .000 .000 .000 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( BA) Cormier vs RH .100 .100 .167 10 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 0.80
( BA) Goodwin,C vs LH .000 .000 .000 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( BA) Goodwin,C vs RH .280 .360 .357 25 7 2 0 0 2 4 0 7.33
( BA) Hammonds vs LH .250 .312 .277 80 20 2 0 1 3 16 1 2.84
( BA) Hammonds vs RH .125 .156 .176 32 4 1 0 0 2 8 1 0.83
( BA) Hundley vs LH .171 .286 .244 70 12 2 0 2 7 14 1 2.32
( BA) Hundley vs RH .213 .401 .326 197 42 4 0 11 34 53 4 4.41
( BA) Hunter,BR vs LH .176 .176 .222 17 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 0.98
( BA) Hunter,BR vs RH .182 .242 .250 33 6 2 0 0 3 14 0 1.88
( BA) Jordan,K vs LH .270 .514 .316 74 20 0 0 6 3 11 0 5.86
( BA) Jordan,K vs RH .114 .114 .173 70 8 0 0 0 5 11 0 0.70
( BA) Kent vs LH .324 .496 .373 139 45 11 2 3 9 16 1 6.86
( BA) Kent vs RH .271 .470 .315 351 95 22 3 14 15 57 11 4.57
( BA) Krivda vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( BA) Krivda vs RH .125 .125 .200 8 1 0 0 0 1 4 0 1.20
( BA) Lankford vs LH .148 .200 .233 115 17 3 0 1 13 31 1 1.59
( BA) Lankford vs RH .254 .462 .319 398 101 28 2 17 40 88 4 5.27
( BA) Nagy vs LH .000 .000 .000 10 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.00
( BA) Nagy vs RH .200 .250 .227 20 4 1 0 0 1 7 0 2.09
( BA) Obando vs LH .300 .400 .300 10 3 1 0 0 0 2 0 4.63
( BA) Obando vs RH .100 .100 .100 20 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.30
( BA) Ochoa vs LH .000 .000 .000 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( BA) Ochoa vs RH .300 .400 .417 10 3 1 0 0 2 6 0 8.10
( BA) Osborne vs LH .143 .286 .300 7 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 3.52
( BA) Osborne vs RH .111 .222 .111 9 1 1 0 0 0 5 0 0.75
( BA) Parris vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( BA) Parris vs RH .667 .667 .500 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 17.01
( BA) Pegues vs LH .243 .357 .312 70 17 5 0 1 7 17 1 3.53
( BA) Pegues vs RH .190 .310 .220 100 19 3 0 3 4 18 0 2.09
( BA) Quantrill vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( BA) Quantrill vs RH .308 .308 .250 13 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 3.13
( BA) Servais vs LH .298 .491 .367 114 34 4 0 6 11 24 2 6.73
( BA) Servais vs RH .215 .392 .280 130 28 14 0 3 9 32 2 3.72
( BA) Tewksbury vs LH .000 .000 .000 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( BA) Tewksbury vs RH .000 .000 .111 8 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.10
( BA) Ventura vs LH .200 .317 .307 120 24 5 0 3 18 26 2 3.53
( BA) Ventura vs RH .293 .504 .366 351 103 14 0 20 41 77 10 6.45
( BA) Zaun vs LH .364 .909 .417 11 4 0 0 2 1 1 1 11.54
( BA) Zaun vs RH .190 .270 .271 63 12 2 0 1 6 6 2 1.98
Baltimore vs LH .254 .413 .324 1785 453 82 5 64 176 333 22 4.65
vs RH .247 .401 .307 3715 916 179 16 121 315 739 75 4.10
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( BA) Baldwin vs LH 45 12 2 10 5 .343 .478 .543 12.5 10.4 5.2
( BA) Baldwin vs RH 30 10 1 9 3 .500 .633 .800 22.5 20.2 6.8
( BA) Carrasco vs LH 212 46 0 28 32 .256 .352 .344 8.8 5.4 6.1
( BA) Carrasco vs RH 188 60 2 17 22 .353 .411 .541 14.0 4.0 5.1
( BA) Cormier vs LH 129 32 0 10 20 .281 .354 .404 10.2 3.2 6.4
( BA) Cormier vs RH 425 117 9 25 64 .298 .342 .457 10.7 2.3 5.9
( BA) Eldred vs LH 43 6 2 4 10 .154 .233 .308 4.8 3.2 7.9
( BA) Eldred vs RH 34 7 3 4 5 .241 .353 .621 8.6 4.9 6.1
( BA) Haynes vs LH 64 6 0 8 18 .111 .226 .130 3.4 4.5 10.1
( BA) Haynes vs RH 42 6 0 4 11 .158 .238 .184 4.9 3.3 9.0
( BA) Krivda vs LH 74 19 1 5 12 .271 .316 .357 9.7 2.5 6.1
( BA) Krivda vs RH 303 86 19 28 46 .323 .397 .583 12.6 4.1 6.7
( BA) Lieber vs LH 264 95 3 16 32 .382 .415 .570 16.0 2.7 5.4
( BA) Lieber vs RH 221 65 3 15 36 .323 .382 .483 11.9 2.7 6.6
( BA) McMichael vs LH 155 31 5 12 34 .221 .283 .336 7.5 2.9 8.3
( BA) McMichael vs RH 168 42 3 20 27 .284 .370 .412 10.2 4.9 6.6
( BA) Mesa vs LH 104 21 0 5 26 .208 .239 .337 7.1 1.7 8.8
( BA) Mesa vs RH 97 14 1 8 32 .159 .224 .239 4.9 2.8 11.2
( BA) Nagy vs LH 595 160 18 57 89 .300 .369 .475 11.2 4.0 6.2
( BA) Nagy vs RH 432 96 14 39 77 .247 .317 .409 8.5 3.5 6.8
( BA) Orosco vs LH 30 1 0 2 7 .034 .094 .034 0.9 1.8 6.3
( BA) Orosco vs RH 76 16 2 9 16 .246 .346 .369 8.8 5.0 8.8
( BA) Osborne vs LH 105 18 2 8 11 .189 .257 .253 6.2 2.8 3.8
( BA) Osborne vs RH 487 138 23 29 74 .301 .341 .488 11.4 2.4 6.1
( BA) Parris vs LH 93 21 4 10 10 .266 .363 .430 9.4 4.5 4.5
( BA) Parris vs RH 54 15 4 1 13 .273 .283 .509 9.9 0.7 8.6
( BA) Perez,Y vs LH 28 8 1 5 4 .348 .464 .565 12.7 7.9 6.4
( BA) Perez,Y vs RH 70 12 2 11 12 .203 .324 .356 6.6 6.1 6.6
( BA) Quantrill vs LH 571 160 12 44 69 .307 .360 .466 11.2 3.1 4.8
( BA) Quantrill vs RH 435 103 8 27 64 .256 .308 .366 8.9 2.3 5.5
( BA) Radinsky vs LH 38 11 2 2 5 .289 .310 .605 10.2 1.9 4.7
( BA) Radinsky vs RH 38 12 1 1 2 .324 .342 .514 14.1 1.2 2.3
( BA) Sirotka vs LH 24 7 1 0 5 .280 .269 .520 10.5 0.0 7.5
( BA) Sirotka vs RH 126 28 1 23 19 .269 .395 .365 9.3 7.7 6.3
( BA) Tewksbury vs LH 253 83 2 8 22 .337 .354 .443 13.3 1.3 3.5
( BA) Tewksbury vs RH 227 77 2 4 30 .347 .364 .437 14.0 0.7 5.4
Baltimore vs LH 2895 752 57 242 417 .286 .346 .430 10.4 3.3 5.8
vs RH 3520 920 101 286 557 .288 .349 .449 10.5 3.3 6.3
California Angels
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( CA) Anderson,Bra vs LH .223 .359 .301 206 46 15 5 1 20 45 0 3.80
( CA) Anderson,Bra vs RH .244 .427 .335 438 107 16 5 18 51 90 4 5.30
( CA) Anderson,G vs LH .196 .375 .207 56 11 2 1 2 1 18 1 2.37
( CA) Anderson,G vs RH .309 .457 .343 346 107 13 1 12 17 72 8 5.74
( CA) Ashby vs LH .176 .176 .130 17 3 0 0 0 0 8 0 1.08
( CA) Ashby vs RH .143 .143 .190 49 7 0 0 0 4 28 0 1.39
( CA) Blowers vs LH .299 .431 .358 144 43 5 1 4 14 39 3 5.78
( CA) Blowers vs RH .218 .415 .293 340 74 11 1 18 34 100 12 3.79
( CA) Bottalico vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( CA) Bottalico vs RH .000 .000 .167 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0.70
( CA) Clark,J vs LH .333 .489 .348 45 15 2 1 1 1 7 1 5.51
( CA) Clark,J vs RH .300 .400 .364 40 12 2 1 0 4 7 3 4.79
( CA) Durham vs LH .249 .381 .281 181 45 11 2 3 9 42 3 3.54
( CA) Durham vs RH .240 .376 .293 396 95 26 5 6 23 72 4 3.68
( CA) Fossas vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( CA) Fossas vs RH ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( CA) Heredia vs LH .333 .333 .333 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.50
( CA) Heredia vs RH .095 .095 .208 21 2 0 0 0 2 3 0 0.82
( CA) Howard,T vs LH .207 .289 .262 121 25 5 1 1 8 13 0 2.75
( CA) Howard,T vs RH .284 .381 .322 194 55 10 0 3 9 26 1 4.57
( CA) Leiter,M vs LH .136 .136 .192 22 3 0 0 0 2 6 0 1.13
( CA) Leiter,M vs RH .200 .200 .226 25 5 0 0 0 2 10 0 1.93
( CA) Nilsson vs LH .222 .370 .344 27 6 1 0 1 4 4 2 3.73
( CA) Nilsson vs RH .285 .438 .312 249 71 12 1 8 8 38 10 4.43
( CA) Owen vs LH .083 .083 .154 24 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0.57
( CA) Owen vs RH .191 .247 .250 89 17 3 1 0 5 8 4 1.82
( CA) Pena,T vs LH .272 .389 .289 162 44 13 0 2 4 44 8 3.25
( CA) Pena,T vs RH .268 .390 .333 41 11 2 0 1 4 8 1 4.76
( CA) Percival vs LH ---- ---- .000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( CA) Percival vs RH .125 .125 .125 8 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.48
( CA) Perez,E vs LH .154 .231 .267 13 2 1 0 0 2 4 0 1.58
( CA) Perez,E vs RH .077 .231 .250 13 1 0 1 0 3 2 1 1.47
( CA) Phillips,J vs LH .167 .167 .167 12 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.90
( CA) Phillips,J vs RH .167 .375 .200 24 4 2 0 1 1 11 0 2.64
( CA) Rogers,K vs LH .067 .067 .067 15 1 0 0 0 0 9 0 0.13
( CA) Rogers,K vs RH .095 .119 .122 42 4 1 0 0 2 16 2 0.40
( CA) Samuel vs LH .378 .770 .434 74 28 6 1 7 7 13 0 14.14
( CA) Samuel vs RH .169 .361 .274 83 14 2 1 4 11 19 1 3.41
( CA) Schilling vs LH .111 .111 .182 9 1 0 0 0 1 6 0 0.97
( CA) Schilling vs RH .286 .429 .278 28 8 4 0 0 1 9 0 4.51
( CA) Steinbach vs LH .320 .480 .346 25 8 1 0 1 1 5 0 6.74
( CA) Steinbach vs RH .245 .394 .282 404 99 30 0 10 18 75 16 3.21
( CA) Strange vs LH .280 .320 .308 25 7 1 0 0 1 5 0 3.81
( CA) Strange vs RH .246 .344 .303 61 15 3 0 1 4 9 0 3.97
( CA) Tartabull vs LH .280 .507 .360 150 42 4 0 10 21 44 6 6.07
( CA) Tartabull vs RH .227 .344 .312 154 35 9 0 3 17 49 5 3.28
( CA) Vaughn,M vs LH .245 .402 .317 204 50 11 3 5 18 60 6 4.27
( CA) Vaughn,M vs RH .304 .600 .349 428 130 26 4 31 26 125 14 7.27
( CA) Weathers vs LH .167 .167 .125 6 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.98
( CA) Weathers vs RH .143 .143 .143 7 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.64
( CA) Weiss vs LH .243 .314 .361 140 34 8 1 0 25 13 0 4.74
( CA) Weiss vs RH .219 .283 .350 329 72 14 2 1 66 38 8 3.78
( CA) Wilson,T vs LH .000 .000 .000 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( CA) Wilson,T vs RH .167 .167 .111 6 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.96
( CA) Young,A vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( CA) Young,A vs RH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -0.00
California vs LH .249 .386 .307 1691 421 86 16 38 141 396 30 4.08
vs RH .248 .400 .309 3823 948 186 23 117 313 826 95 4.18
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( CA) Ashby vs LH 540 110 12 40 96 .223 .289 .354 7.5 2.7 6.6
( CA) Ashby vs RH 531 89 8 34 107 .180 .238 .267 5.7 2.2 6.8
( CA) Blomdahl vs LH 3 1 1 0 0 .333 .333 1.333 13.5 0.0 0.0
( CA) Blomdahl vs RH 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 0.0 0.0 0.0
( CA) Bottalico vs LH 131 26 4 19 25 .232 .344 .375 8.2 6.0 7.8
( CA) Bottalico vs RH 154 24 4 15 44 .174 .258 .297 5.4 3.4 9.9
( CA) Fossas vs LH 34 7 0 3 4 .233 .324 .267 8.2 3.5 4.7
( CA) Fossas vs RH 77 17 0 7 23 .246 .316 .275 8.8 3.6 11.9
( CA) Harris,GA vs LH 44 11 3 5 7 .282 .364 .564 11.0 5.0 7.0
( CA) Harris,GA vs RH 44 12 3 2 9 .279 .304 .535 9.8 1.6 7.4
( CA) Heredia vs LH 281 83 6 13 50 .310 .344 .459 11.7 1.8 7.1
( CA) Heredia vs RH 318 83 8 6 51 .266 .281 .420 9.4 0.7 5.8
( CA) Holmes vs LH 89 25 0 13 15 .325 .418 .390 13.5 7.0 8.1
( CA) Holmes vs RH 84 12 0 7 23 .154 .216 .179 4.6 2.7 8.9
( CA) Leiter,M vs LH 506 134 18 47 83 .295 .365 .484 10.9 3.8 6.7
( CA) Leiter,M vs RH 449 107 12 24 82 .254 .302 .399 9.0 2.0 6.9
( CA) Patterson,B vs LH 38 4 0 2 13 .111 .158 .111 3.3 1.6 10.6
( CA) Patterson,B vs RH 55 14 3 5 7 .292 .370 .562 11.1 4.0 5.6
( CA) Percival vs LH 131 16 2 16 36 .136 .234 .203 4.3 4.3 9.6
( CA) Percival vs RH 167 18 1 12 55 .115 .178 .173 3.4 2.3 10.5
( CA) Rogers,K vs LH 206 44 7 15 37 .232 .293 .384 8.0 2.7 6.8
( CA) Rogers,K vs RH 866 186 27 68 150 .232 .295 .395 7.9 2.9 6.4
( CA) Schilling vs LH 296 56 10 12 82 .196 .229 .361 6.5 1.4 9.5
( CA) Schilling vs RH 245 47 7 12 64 .200 .239 .302 6.5 1.7 8.9
( CA) Weathers vs LH 143 37 5 20 27 .311 .427 .513 11.5 6.2 8.4
( CA) Weathers vs RH 137 36 5 13 17 .293 .364 .472 10.3 3.7 4.9
( CA) Wilson,T vs LH 54 17 2 6 8 .362 .444 .574 15.3 5.4 7.2
( CA) Wilson,T vs RH 221 51 7 28 22 .264 .362 .399 8.9 4.9 3.9
( CA) Young,A vs LH 87 22 2 3 9 .262 .287 .417 9.4 1.3 3.9
( CA) Young,A vs RH 99 24 7 4 5 .261 .317 .554 9.3 1.5 1.9
California vs LH 2583 593 72 214 492 .252 .318 .403 8.9 3.2 7.4
vs RH 3448 720 92 237 659 .225 .282 .360 7.5 2.5 6.9
Kansas City Royals
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( KC) Appier vs LH .100 .100 .125 20 2 0 0 0 0 8 0 0.61
( KC) Appier vs RH .111 .167 .122 36 4 2 0 0 1 13 0 0.76
( KC) Bunch vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( KC) Bunch vs RH ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( KC) Cookson vs LH .500 .500 .667 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 22.68
( KC) Cookson vs RH ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( KC) Damon vs LH .297 .486 .372 37 11 3 2 0 4 3 0 8.15
( KC) Damon vs RH .279 .490 .284 104 29 7 3 3 2 19 1 5.09
( KC) DiPoto vs LH .333 .333 .333 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.50
( KC) DiPoto vs RH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( KC) DiSarcina vs LH .258 .393 .283 89 23 6 0 2 5 9 1 3.88
( KC) DiSarcina vs RH .212 .286 .252 189 40 5 3 1 8 25 5 2.35
( KC) Eisenreich vs LH .229 .286 .345 70 16 2 1 0 13 9 1 3.52
( KC) Eisenreich vs RH .312 .490 .333 359 112 18 5 12 14 35 9 5.91
( KC) Encarnacion vs LH .186 .257 .250 70 13 0 1 1 6 8 2 2.08
( KC) Encarnacion vs RH .254 .365 .258 63 16 1 3 0 1 15 2 2.89
( KC) Gordon vs LH .235 .294 .409 17 4 1 0 0 5 8 0 5.35
( KC) Gordon vs RH .146 .171 .156 41 6 1 0 0 1 19 1 0.81
( KC) Green,T vs LH .200 .600 .250 10 2 1 0 1 1 3 0 5.09
( KC) Green,T vs RH .375 1.125 .444 8 3 0 0 2 1 3 0 22.22
( KC) Gubicza vs LH .071 .071 .071 14 1 0 0 0 0 7 0 0.15
( KC) Gubicza vs RH .091 .121 .088 33 3 1 0 0 0 10 1 0.22
( KC) Hamilton,J vs LH .100 .100 .091 10 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.37
( KC) Hamilton,J vs RH .000 .000 .106 41 0 0 0 0 4 31 0 0.16
( KC) Haney,C vs LH .111 .111 .111 9 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.38
( KC) Haney,C vs RH .125 .125 .111 16 2 0 0 0 0 6 0 0.57
( KC) Haney,T vs LH .541 .730 .585 37 20 7 0 0 4 3 0 26.07
( KC) Haney,T vs RH .381 .452 .451 42 16 3 0 0 7 7 0 9.51
( KC) Hosey vs LH .318 .455 .348 22 7 1 1 0 1 3 0 5.54
( KC) Hosey vs RH .271 .500 .364 48 13 5 0 2 7 11 0 7.83
( KC) Joyner vs LH .257 .340 .327 144 37 12 0 0 14 17 6 3.72
( KC) Joyner vs RH .330 .483 .401 352 116 24 0 10 42 55 10 7.52
( KC) King vs LH .286 .571 .349 175 50 20 0 10 17 24 6 6.71
( KC) King vs RH .239 .404 .305 364 87 22 1 12 38 50 8 4.26
( KC) Macfarlane vs LH .192 .474 .308 78 15 7 0 5 10 24 2 4.79
( KC) Macfarlane vs RH .235 .391 .319 243 57 15 1 7 21 58 7 4.22
( KC) Magnante vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( KC) Magnante vs RH ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( KC) Martin,A vs LH .159 .255 .237 145 23 8 3 0 13 20 1 1.94
( KC) Martin,A vs RH .285 .465 .351 344 98 24 1 12 33 82 6 5.93
( KC) McLemore vs LH .231 .338 .313 130 30 10 2 0 15 19 4 3.02
( KC) McLemore vs RH .222 .312 .291 356 79 16 2 4 37 65 8 3.01
( KC) McRae vs LH .230 .377 .329 183 42 13 1 4 25 22 5 4.55
( KC) McRae vs RH .296 .469 .348 433 128 34 7 9 30 77 6 5.84
( KC) Norman vs LH .125 .125 .300 8 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1.76
( KC) Norman vs RH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( KC) Nunnally vs LH .148 .407 .266 81 12 3 3 4 12 31 0 3.84
( KC) Nunnally vs RH .217 .404 .338 166 36 8 4 5 29 51 1 5.09
( KC) Pichardo vs LH .333 .333 .333 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4.50
( KC) Pichardo vs RH .167 .167 .167 6 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.90
( KC) Randa vs LH .250 .250 .500 4 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 6.84
( KC) Randa vs RH .120 .140 .185 50 6 1 0 0 4 11 1 0.70
( KC) Slaught vs LH .286 .286 .318 21 6 0 0 0 1 2 2 2.26
( KC) Slaught vs RH .287 .337 .327 101 29 5 0 0 6 8 5 3.47
( KC) Snopek vs LH .308 .462 .426 39 12 3 0 1 8 14 2 7.07
( KC) Snopek vs RH .343 .429 .410 70 24 3 0 1 8 8 2 7.39
( KC) Tucker,M vs LH .750 .750 .750 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 60.75
( KC) Tucker,M vs RH .250 .268 .300 56 14 1 0 0 4 15 1 2.90
( KC) Velarde vs LH .308 .458 .388 120 37 6 0 4 17 15 1 7.39
( KC) Velarde vs RH .248 .356 .339 298 74 14 0 6 41 55 8 4.34
( KC) Vitiello vs LH .276 .345 .300 58 16 1 0 1 2 14 2 3.32
( KC) Vitiello vs RH .200 .400 .256 40 8 2 0 2 3 10 0 3.57
( KC) Vosberg vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( KC) Vosberg vs RH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
Kansas City vs LH .242 .386 .320 1606 389 104 14 33 178 275 35 4.28
vs RH .259 .397 .320 3867 1001 212 30 88 343 747 82 4.47
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( KC) Appier vs LH 472 88 3 57 98 .215 .320 .289 7.1 4.6 7.9
( KC) Appier vs RH 404 58 5 35 100 .158 .237 .243 4.8 2.9 8.3
( KC) Bunch vs LH 7 1 0 0 1 .143 .143 .143 4.5 0.0 4.5
( KC) Bunch vs RH 5 2 1 0 1 .400 .400 1.000 18.0 0.0 9.0
( KC) DiPoto vs LH 149 46 1 13 18 .346 .416 .526 12.9 3.7 5.1
( KC) DiPoto vs RH 167 34 1 12 32 .224 .293 .336 7.6 2.7 7.1
( KC) Dyer vs LH 69 19 1 10 13 .339 .448 .500 12.8 6.8 8.8
( KC) Dyer vs RH 73 19 1 4 10 .264 .293 .347 9.3 2.0 4.9
( KC) Gordon vs LH 507 123 7 50 80 .270 .338 .388 9.5 3.9 6.2
( KC) Gordon vs RH 464 112 2 47 73 .270 .342 .376 9.3 3.9 6.1
( KC) Green,T vs LH 234 57 5 30 30 .282 .376 .426 10.0 5.3 5.3
( KC) Green,T vs RH 208 53 8 15 36 .270 .319 .439 9.1 2.6 6.2
( KC) Gubicza vs LH 534 165 10 37 49 .328 .370 .475 12.5 2.8 3.7
( KC) Gubicza vs RH 514 111 16 41 56 .239 .304 .401 7.8 2.9 3.9
( KC) Gunderson vs LH 13 5 0 0 1 .455 .538 .636 16.9 0.0 3.4
( KC) Gunderson vs RH 25 9 0 3 5 .409 .480 .545 16.2 5.4 9.0
( KC) Hamilton,J vs LH 503 129 12 36 65 .280 .336 .417 10.0 2.8 5.0
( KC) Hamilton,J vs RH 461 110 11 26 74 .259 .321 .415 9.0 2.1 6.0
( KC) Haney,C vs LH 72 20 2 10 9 .317 .405 .556 12.6 6.3 5.7
( KC) Haney,C vs RH 360 75 13 31 35 .230 .302 .393 7.6 3.2 3.6
( KC) Magnante vs LH 57 9 2 6 7 .180 .268 .340 5.8 3.9 4.5
( KC) Magnante vs RH 172 54 7 12 33 .335 .380 .540 13.4 3.0 8.2
( KC) Montgomery vs LH 95 17 1 7 23 .195 .265 .253 6.1 2.5 8.3
( KC) Montgomery vs RH 124 29 5 14 21 .276 .374 .457 9.8 4.7 7.1
( KC) Pichardo vs LH 97 22 1 7 20 .253 .330 .345 8.7 2.8 7.9
( KC) Pichardo vs RH 112 30 1 6 22 .288 .333 .375 10.1 2.0 7.4
( KC) Torres,D vs LH 9 3 0 1 1 .429 .444 .857 13.5 4.5 4.5
( KC) Torres,D vs RH 0 0 0 0 0 ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
( KC) Vosberg vs LH 56 15 0 3 16 .288 .316 .327 9.6 1.9 10.3
( KC) Vosberg vs RH 62 16 2 14 10 .333 .455 .521 13.1 11.5 8.2
Kansas City vs LH 2874 719 45 267 431 .278 .348 .405 9.9 3.7 5.9
vs RH 3151 712 73 260 508 .249 .316 .389 8.4 3.1 6.0
Montreal Expos
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( MO) Andrews vs LH .273 .545 .304 22 6 1 1 1 1 8 1 5.08
( MO) Andrews vs RH .180 .440 .246 50 9 4 0 3 4 15 2 3.07
( MO) Baerga vs LH .321 .515 .345 165 53 11 0 7 7 10 1 7.02
( MO) Baerga vs RH .312 .418 .333 459 143 15 2 10 13 43 10 5.21
( MO) Berry vs LH .326 .527 .386 129 42 11 0 5 14 26 1 7.45
( MO) Berry vs RH .302 .556 .356 189 57 16 4 8 16 35 1 7.03
( MO) Bonds vs LH .261 .400 .382 165 43 7 2 4 33 23 5 5.91
( MO) Bonds vs RH .269 .559 .389 401 108 24 7 26 79 64 2 8.39
( MO) Cangelosi vs LH .211 .300 .343 90 19 3 1 1 17 13 0 4.18
( MO) Cangelosi vs RH .289 .387 .400 142 41 4 5 0 27 21 3 6.30
( MO) Cordero vs LH .294 .434 .345 136 40 13 0 2 10 27 3 5.20
( MO) Cordero vs RH .251 .350 .299 446 112 28 2 4 25 74 13 3.18
( MO) Cruz vs LH .111 .111 .200 9 1 0 0 0 1 3 1 0.53
( MO) Cruz vs RH .231 .231 .200 13 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1.82
( MO) Faneyte vs LH .188 .250 .278 16 3 1 0 0 2 3 0 2.61
( MO) Faneyte vs RH .222 .259 .344 54 12 2 0 0 10 15 1 3.28
( MO) Fassero vs LH .105 .105 .200 19 2 0 0 0 3 8 0 1.17
( MO) Fassero vs RH .194 .194 .250 36 7 0 0 0 4 17 0 2.07
( MO) Floyd vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( MO) Floyd vs RH .070 .070 .200 43 3 0 0 0 6 17 0 0.79
( MO) Galarraga vs LH .267 .466 .343 161 43 9 1 7 14 33 8 5.20
( MO) Galarraga vs RH .293 .486 .328 393 115 22 3 16 21 95 9 5.48
( MO) Grudz'lanek vs LH .140 .233 .196 43 6 2 1 0 3 9 0 1.36
( MO) Grudz'lanek vs RH .251 .356 .296 267 67 15 5 1 10 42 5 3.64
( MO) Hernandez,R vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( MO) Hernandez,R vs RH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( MO) Laker vs LH .227 .250 .340 44 10 1 0 0 7 7 3 2.12
( MO) Laker vs RH .185 .231 .214 65 12 3 0 0 1 24 2 1.48
( MO) Maddux,G vs LH .174 .217 .200 23 4 1 0 0 1 7 0 1.56
( MO) Maddux,G vs RH .140 .160 .132 50 7 1 0 0 0 17 0 0.74
( MO) Mlicki vs LH .000 .000 .000 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.00
( MO) Mlicki vs RH .143 .143 .318 14 2 0 0 0 5 2 0 2.78
( MO) Perez,C vs LH .000 .000 .111 8 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0.10
( MO) Perez,C vs RH .077 .179 .128 39 3 1 0 1 3 20 0 0.87
( MO) Risley vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( MO) Risley vs RH .500 1.000 .500 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 27.00
( MO) Robertson vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( MO) Robertson vs RH .000 .000 .500 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3.51
( MO) Rojas vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( MO) Rojas vs RH .000 .000 .000 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( MO) Rueter vs LH .000 .000 .000 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.00
( MO) Rueter vs RH .100 .100 .231 10 1 0 0 0 2 5 0 1.27
( MO) Santangelo vs LH .262 .333 .340 42 11 3 0 0 5 3 0 4.69
( MO) Santangelo vs RH .261 .370 .333 46 12 1 2 0 5 12 1 4.43
( MO) Spehr vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( MO) Spehr vs RH .312 .562 .500 16 5 4 0 0 6 3 0 12.96
( MO) Taubensee vs LH .200 .200 .200 10 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 1.35
( MO) Taubensee vs RH .304 .508 .376 309 94 28 4 9 34 59 2 7.34
( MO) VanderWal vs LH .167 .333 .267 12 2 2 0 0 2 5 0 3.30
( MO) VanderWal vs RH .306 .559 .371 111 34 10 0 6 11 22 1 7.65
( MO) Wakefield vs LH .231 .231 .214 13 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 1.85
( MO) Wakefield vs RH .071 .071 .122 42 3 0 0 0 3 9 0 0.45
( MO) Walker,L vs LH .236 .391 .295 161 38 11 1 4 9 23 6 3.62
( MO) Walker,L vs RH .324 .661 .394 413 134 29 7 32 29 57 16 9.41
( MO) Webster,L vs LH .211 .356 .304 90 19 7 0 2 12 16 1 3.82
( MO) Webster,L vs RH .286 .643 .375 14 4 2 0 1 2 4 1 7.30
( MO) White,Ro vs LH .392 .582 .448 79 31 1 1 4 7 12 2 11.44
( MO) White,Ro vs RH .260 .415 .326 342 89 30 1 7 28 69 8 4.68
( MO) Young,Ern vs LH .105 .421 .190 19 2 0 0 2 2 6 0 2.58
( MO) Young,Ern vs RH .000 .000 .250 6 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0.58
Montreal vs LH .257 .404 .329 1477 380 84 8 39 151 259 32 4.67
vs RH .270 .444 .333 4002 1079 240 42 124 346 754 78 5.20
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( MO) Eischen vs LH 7 1 0 2 1 .200 .429 .600 6.8 13.5 6.8
( MO) Eischen vs RH 11 2 0 0 2 .182 .182 .182 6.8 0.0 6.8
( MO) Fassero vs LH 204 30 2 21 44 .165 .250 .258 5.2 3.6 7.6
( MO) Fassero vs RH 961 247 23 75 207 .279 .335 .420 9.9 3.0 8.3
( MO) Hernandez,R vs LH 130 33 2 9 31 .277 .331 .370 10.0 2.7 9.4
( MO) Hernandez,R vs RH 126 24 7 16 29 .224 .317 .449 7.6 5.1 9.2
( MO) Maddux,G vs LH 505 95 3 16 88 .195 .221 .274 6.3 1.1 5.8
( MO) Maddux,G vs RH 529 91 6 8 121 .176 .193 .254 5.7 0.5 7.6
( MO) Mlicki vs LH 204 58 8 19 31 .317 .380 .525 12.1 4.0 6.5
( MO) Mlicki vs RH 197 39 4 16 30 .215 .278 .348 6.9 2.8 5.3
( MO) Perez,C vs LH 140 20 0 7 31 .149 .190 .216 4.9 1.7 7.5
( MO) Perez,C vs RH 614 149 27 31 128 .255 .292 .433 9.0 1.9 7.8
( MO) Perez,Me vs LH 133 37 3 11 21 .303 .361 .451 11.4 3.4 6.4
( MO) Perez,Me vs RH 71 15 2 12 13 .246 .360 .410 8.4 6.8 7.3
( MO) Risley vs LH 81 19 2 10 15 .275 .358 .406 8.8 4.7 7.0
( MO) Risley vs RH 93 19 0 7 24 .226 .290 .321 7.2 2.7 9.1
( MO) Robertson vs LH 61 11 1 10 13 .216 .344 .314 6.8 6.1 8.0
( MO) Robertson vs RH 130 32 2 15 23 .281 .362 .386 9.9 4.7 7.1
( MO) Rojas vs LH 103 25 0 8 16 .263 .314 .411 9.2 3.0 5.9
( MO) Rojas vs RH 88 22 0 6 15 .275 .333 .338 9.9 2.7 6.8
( MO) Rueter vs LH 65 11 1 2 14 .175 .200 .286 5.8 1.1 7.4
( MO) Rueter vs RH 271 73 3 16 44 .287 .328 .417 10.8 2.4 6.5
( MO) Simas vs LH 28 3 0 5 13 .130 .286 .130 4.1 6.8 17.5
( MO) Simas vs RH 28 1 0 3 13 .040 .143 .080 1.1 3.4 14.6
( MO) Wakefield vs LH 440 103 9 36 52 .261 .330 .392 9.1 3.2 4.6
( MO) Wakefield vs RH 499 97 10 45 83 .216 .291 .339 7.2 3.4 6.2
( MO) Walker,M vs LH 98 22 0 14 12 .265 .360 .337 8.7 5.6 4.8
( MO) Walker,M vs RH 107 24 1 10 12 .253 .339 .316 9.0 3.8 4.5
Montreal vs LH 2199 468 31 170 382 .233 .293 .345 7.9 2.9 6.4
vs RH 3725 835 85 260 744 .242 .297 .372 8.3 2.6 7.4
Oakland Athletics
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( OA) Acre vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( OA) Acre vs RH .500 .500 .500 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 13.50
( OA) Aldrete vs LH .250 .375 .400 8 2 1 0 0 2 1 0 6.34
( OA) Aldrete vs RH .259 .389 .325 108 28 8 0 2 11 18 2 4.55
( OA) Beltre vs LH .182 .273 .231 11 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 2.36
( OA) Beltre vs RH .200 .289 .275 45 9 4 0 0 4 12 0 2.97
( OA) Bordick vs LH .293 .386 .322 140 41 4 0 3 7 12 1 4.79
( OA) Bordick vs RH .240 .282 .294 312 75 7 0 2 15 32 8 2.91
( OA) Brosius vs LH .224 .312 .310 125 28 8 0 1 16 19 1 3.51
( OA) Brosius vs RH .245 .438 .350 233 57 16 1 9 33 39 4 5.46
( OA) Clark,To vs LH .237 .368 .275 38 9 2 0 1 2 13 0 3.72
( OA) Clark,To vs RH .194 .226 .286 31 6 1 0 0 4 13 0 2.08
( OA) Eshelman vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( OA) Eshelman vs RH .000 .000 .000 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( OA) Flaherty vs LH .198 .385 .243 91 18 5 0 4 7 20 1 3.14
( OA) Flaherty vs RH .224 .430 .246 107 24 7 0 5 5 13 0 3.57
( OA) Gates vs LH .222 .281 .293 185 41 8 0 1 22 32 0 3.27
( OA) Gates vs RH .234 .374 .276 337 79 20 3 7 19 48 12 3.10
( OA) Giambi vs LH .150 .150 .333 20 3 0 0 0 5 6 1 2.14
( OA) Giambi vs RH .283 .370 .365 173 49 6 0 3 22 36 4 4.96
( OA) Grebeck vs LH .391 .438 .446 64 25 3 0 0 6 6 3 7.74
( OA) Grebeck vs RH .191 .287 .277 94 18 9 0 0 12 15 3 2.65
( OA) Helfand vs LH ---- ---- 1.000 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 INF
( OA) Helfand vs RH .171 .229 .205 35 6 2 0 0 2 6 3 0.97
( OA) Herrera vs LH .167 .167 .167 6 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.90
( OA) Herrera vs RH .226 .283 .281 53 12 1 1 0 3 12 0 2.76
( OA) Hitchcock vs LH .000 .000 .200 4 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1.05
( OA) Hitchcock vs RH .083 .083 .188 12 1 0 0 0 2 3 0 1.00
( OA) Javier vs LH .285 .390 .332 172 49 12 0 2 10 24 0 5.80
( OA) Javier vs RH .277 .407 .340 354 98 19 0 9 35 49 0 5.87
( OA) Johns vs LH .200 .200 .167 5 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 0.00
( OA) Johns vs RH ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( OA) Manwaring vs LH .210 .387 .265 62 13 3 1 2 4 8 1 3.49
( OA) Manwaring vs RH .231 .290 .271 238 55 14 0 0 13 43 4 2.74
( OA) Mussina vs LH .182 .273 .182 11 2 1 0 0 0 3 0 1.64
( OA) Mussina vs RH .080 .080 .080 25 2 0 0 0 0 8 0 0.19
( OA) Pemberton vs LH .455 .636 .500 22 10 4 0 0 1 3 3 9.80
( OA) Pemberton vs RH .500 .750 .500 4 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 6.75
( OA) Prieto vs LH .500 .500 .500 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.50
( OA) Prieto vs RH .333 .333 .333 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.50
( OA) Salmon vs LH .353 .659 .446 170 60 10 0 14 28 36 4 11.36
( OA) Salmon vs RH .317 .531 .407 407 129 25 1 20 60 96 8 8.28
( OA) Smith,Z vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( OA) Smith,Z vs RH .000 .000 .000 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( OA) Surhoff vs LH .259 .371 .328 116 30 7 0 2 11 12 2 4.30
( OA) Surhoff vs RH .340 .526 .396 306 104 23 5 8 24 32 7 8.17
( OA) Tettleton vs LH .164 .254 .331 134 22 6 0 2 35 32 4 2.84
( OA) Tettleton vs RH .261 .497 .427 330 86 7 1 23 91 75 8 8.14
( OA) Thomas,F vs LH .341 .618 .475 170 58 11 0 12 44 25 2 12.52
( OA) Thomas,F vs RH .294 .569 .407 408 120 25 0 29 78 66 6 9.11
( OA) VanPoppel vs LH 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 INF
( OA) VanPoppel vs RH .000 .000 .000 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( OA) Ward vs LH .154 .179 .239 39 6 1 0 0 5 4 1 1.41
( OA) Ward vs RH .292 .500 .320 72 21 3 0 4 3 13 0 6.35
( OA) Williams,Geo vs LH .375 .625 .444 8 3 2 0 0 1 1 0 12.62
( OA) Williams,Geo vs RH .353 .824 .421 17 6 2 0 2 1 5 0 15.01
( OA) Wojc'ckwski vs LH .000 .000 .000 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.00
( OA) Wojc'ckwski vs RH .111 .111 .100 18 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.46
Oakland vs LH .266 .406 .348 1661 442 92 3 45 216 275 26 5.28
vs RH .265 .418 .344 3937 1044 206 11 125 463 687 77 5.25
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( OA) Acre vs LH 121 25 2 19 16 .245 .368 .373 8.5 6.5 5.5
( OA) Acre vs RH 163 34 6 18 34 .239 .337 .423 8.2 4.3 8.2
( OA) Eckersley vs LH 104 30 3 4 20 .303 .330 .485 11.6 1.5 7.7
( OA) Eckersley vs RH 117 29 5 10 23 .282 .345 .495 9.8 3.4 7.8
( OA) Eshelman vs LH 62 10 0 6 7 .182 .262 .236 6.0 3.6 4.2
( OA) Eshelman vs RH 188 54 0 14 28 .307 .351 .398 12.0 3.1 6.2
( OA) Groom vs LH 73 29 1 7 7 .426 .468 .632 20.1 4.8 4.8
( OA) Groom vs RH 232 77 8 30 26 .379 .456 .557 15.8 6.1 5.3
( OA) Hawkins vs LH 148 46 2 20 10 .351 .423 .511 13.6 5.9 3.0
( OA) Hawkins vs RH 126 32 4 15 13 .288 .375 .459 10.3 4.8 4.2
( OA) Hitchcock vs LH 216 46 4 22 38 .238 .323 .368 8.3 4.0 6.8
( OA) Hitchcock vs RH 670 145 33 59 123 .238 .307 .444 7.8 3.2 6.7
( OA) Johns vs LH 71 15 0 4 6 .238 .314 .302 8.3 2.2 3.3
( OA) Johns vs RH 209 39 10 25 30 .217 .329 .411 7.0 4.5 5.4
( OA) Leiper vs LH 43 4 0 3 9 .098 .156 .146 2.9 2.2 6.6
( OA) Leiper vs RH 60 15 1 7 9 .288 .361 .385 10.4 4.8 6.2
( OA) Miceli vs LH 89 18 2 9 16 .222 .297 .333 7.4 3.7 6.5
( OA) Miceli vs RH 95 17 4 11 20 .205 .306 .410 6.5 4.2 7.6
( OA) Mohler vs LH 26 8 0 1 5 .320 .346 .440 12.7 1.6 7.9
( OA) Mohler vs RH 40 7 0 3 10 .200 .263 .257 6.3 2.7 9.0
( OA) Mussina vs LH 587 130 21 37 109 .236 .282 .389 8.2 2.3 6.8
( OA) Mussina vs RH 516 103 12 26 104 .212 .254 .346 7.0 1.8 7.1
( OA) Painter vs LH 24 3 0 0 4 .130 .167 .174 4.3 0.0 5.7
( OA) Painter vs RH 36 13 7 4 9 .419 .486 1.097 16.7 5.1 11.6
( OA) Prieto vs LH 122 30 0 19 20 .291 .403 .417 10.3 6.5 6.8
( OA) Prieto vs RH 95 17 0 14 18 .218 .361 .308 7.2 5.9 7.6
( OA) Smith,Z vs LH 58 18 2 4 5 .333 .379 .556 12.8 2.8 3.6
( OA) Smith,Z vs RH 261 81 8 10 26 .327 .352 .516 12.4 1.5 4.0
( OA) VanPoppel vs LH 215 47 7 16 39 .240 .302 .383 8.4 2.9 7.0
( OA) VanPoppel vs RH 238 55 8 17 50 .250 .308 .432 9.0 2.8 8.2
( OA) Wasdin vs LH 25 6 1 1 2 .250 .280 .417 8.5 1.4 2.8
( OA) Wasdin vs RH 38 3 0 3 7 .088 .184 .088 2.7 2.7 6.3
( OA) Wengert vs LH 33 6 1 2 3 .188 .229 .312 6.2 2.1 3.1
( OA) Wengert vs RH 51 10 1 3 6 .213 .260 .277 6.9 2.1 4.2
( OA) Wojc'ckwski vs LH 204 31 3 21 19 .168 .251 .297 5.3 3.6 3.2
( OA) Wojc'ckwski vs RH 764 180 27 81 79 .263 .340 .449 9.2 4.1 4.0
Oakland vs LH 2338 523 51 207 349 .246 .313 .382 8.6 3.4 5.7
vs RH 3891 909 126 350 610 .259 .329 .430 9.0 3.5 6.1
Houston Astros
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( HO) Alomar,S vs LH .300 .506 .335 170 51 2 0 11 8 25 3 6.29
( HO) Alomar,S vs RH .293 .310 .323 58 17 1 0 0 3 10 1 3.71
( HO) Avery vs LH .095 .190 .115 21 2 0 1 0 1 8 0 0.86
( HO) Avery vs RH .133 .233 .108 30 4 0 0 1 0 12 0 0.94
( HO) Bagwell vs LH .323 .591 .391 127 41 13 0 7 17 26 2 9.01
( HO) Bagwell vs RH .261 .409 .316 276 72 11 0 10 23 71 5 4.57
( HO) Biggio vs LH .344 .646 .430 192 66 10 0 16 26 25 2 11.05
( HO) Biggio vs RH .261 .435 .369 414 108 16 1 18 65 63 4 6.20
( HO) Burba vs LH .000 .000 .000 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( HO) Burba vs RH .000 .000 .154 10 0 0 0 0 2 9 0 0.39
( HO) Caminiti vs LH .290 .549 .376 193 56 8 0 14 29 30 3 7.73
( HO) Caminiti vs RH .237 .352 .318 426 101 22 0 9 52 87 10 3.93
( HO) Clayton vs LH .270 .401 .325 152 41 8 0 4 13 35 3 4.40
( HO) Clayton vs RH .274 .385 .334 325 89 19 1 5 30 53 7 4.55
( HO) Cummings,M vs LH .050 .050 .095 20 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0.17
( HO) Cummings,M vs RH .309 .427 .345 110 34 7 0 2 6 19 0 5.85
( HO) Eusebio vs LH .333 .444 .333 18 6 2 0 0 0 5 0 6.00
( HO) Eusebio vs RH .275 .382 .329 356 98 20 3 4 29 63 11 4.25
( HO) Gomez,L vs LH .186 .326 .315 43 8 0 0 2 9 10 0 4.11
( HO) Gomez,L vs RH .231 .250 .293 52 12 1 0 0 3 9 0 2.63
( HO) Gonzalez,L vs LH .241 .517 .294 58 14 5 1 3 5 8 1 5.18
( HO) Gonzalez,L vs RH .249 .421 .319 373 93 23 7 9 36 73 8 4.51
( HO) Hartgraves vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( HO) Hartgraves vs RH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( HO) Henry,B vs LH .000 .000 .000 12 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( HO) Henry,B vs RH .080 .080 .069 25 2 0 0 0 0 9 0 0.28
( HO) Jones,Chris vs LH .269 .500 .322 104 28 4 4 4 9 26 2 5.69
( HO) Jones,Chris vs RH .229 .390 .270 118 27 0 2 5 5 32 1 3.56
( HO) Jones,T vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( HO) Jones,T vs RH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 -0.00
( HO) Jordan,B vs LH .294 .542 .343 214 63 12 7 9 10 23 2 6.91
( HO) Jordan,B vs RH .278 .450 .311 431 120 19 5 15 17 26 4 5.19
( HO) Juden vs LH .000 .000 .000 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.00
( HO) Juden vs RH .000 .000 .125 6 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.38
( HO) Kile vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( HO) Kile vs RH .042 .083 .115 24 1 1 0 0 2 20 0 0.34
( HO) Lofton vs LH .302 .396 .340 149 45 7 2 1 10 11 0 5.55
( HO) Lofton vs RH .317 .473 .352 281 89 16 5 6 16 26 1 6.54
( HO) McDonald vs LH .000 .000 .250 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1.75
( HO) McDonald vs RH .136 .182 .125 22 3 1 0 0 0 5 0 0.81
( HO) Mouton,J vs LH .313 .429 .360 163 51 8 1 3 9 33 2 6.05
( HO) Mouton,J vs RH .289 .395 .357 114 33 9 0 1 10 30 3 4.94
( HO) Nevin vs LH .000 .000 .000 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( HO) Nevin vs RH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( HO) Petagine vs LH .143 .143 .333 7 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 1.30
( HO) Petagine vs RH .198 .385 .304 96 19 6 0 4 16 39 4 3.70
( HO) Portugal vs LH .250 .333 .333 12 3 1 0 0 1 3 0 4.54
( HO) Portugal vs RH .161 .194 .200 31 5 1 0 0 4 5 0 1.84
( HO) Shipley vs LH .293 .328 .328 58 17 2 0 0 2 5 4 3.19
( HO) Shipley vs RH .348 .466 .380 161 56 7 0 4 5 26 7 6.37
( HO) Strawberry vs LH .200 .200 .333 5 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2.83
( HO) Strawberry vs RH .377 .672 .424 61 23 3 3 3 5 12 1 11.98
( HO) Veres,D vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( HO) Veres,D vs RH .000 .000 .000 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.00
( HO) Wagner vs LH .200 .200 .235 15 3 0 0 0 1 3 0 1.85
( HO) Wagner vs RH .167 .233 .257 30 5 2 0 0 4 10 0 2.29
( HO) Wall vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( HO) Wall vs RH ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
Houston vs LH .284 .475 .342 1755 498 82 16 74 155 294 25 5.98
vs RH .263 .400 .322 3847 1011 185 27 96 333 721 68 4.59
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( HO) Avery vs LH 204 33 2 7 41 .170 .212 .232 5.2 1.1 6.5
( HO) Avery vs RH 759 162 25 62 167 .235 .302 .379 8.0 3.0 8.2
( HO) Benitez,A vs LH 14 5 1 4 1 .556 .714 .889 33.8 27.0 6.8
( HO) Benitez,A vs RH 9 0 0 1 4 .000 .111 .000 0.0 2.7 10.8
( HO) Borland vs LH 105 27 1 16 18 .300 .402 .411 10.9 6.4 7.3
( HO) Borland vs RH 106 27 0 15 25 .321 .436 .476 11.6 6.4 10.7
( HO) Bowen vs LH 4 2 0 0 0 .500 .500 .500 27.0 0.0 0.0
( HO) Bowen vs RH 1 0 0 0 0 .000 .000 .000 0.0 0.0 0.0
( HO) Burba vs LH 199 46 3 20 31 .257 .328 .324 9.3 4.1 6.3
( HO) Burba vs RH 153 22 3 19 30 .165 .266 .256 4.9 4.2 6.6
( HO) Davis,T vs LH 11 3 0 1 2 .300 .364 .400 11.6 3.9 7.7
( HO) Davis,T vs RH 24 5 1 4 4 .250 .375 .500 7.9 6.4 6.4
( HO) Hartgraves vs LH 29 6 0 2 3 .231 .286 .269 7.7 2.6 3.9
( HO) Hartgraves vs RH 35 5 1 7 5 .185 .353 .333 6.1 8.6 6.1
( HO) Henry,B vs LH 137 27 1 10 20 .214 .279 .278 6.9 2.6 5.1
( HO) Henry,B vs RH 520 132 14 40 68 .276 .333 .433 9.9 3.0 5.1
( HO) Hudek vs LH 43 12 3 3 10 .300 .349 .600 11.2 2.8 9.3
( HO) Hudek vs RH 21 6 1 1 6 .300 .333 .500 10.8 1.8 10.8
( HO) Jones,T vs LH 147 38 5 12 27 .292 .352 .477 10.6 3.3 7.5
( HO) Jones,T vs RH 117 27 3 14 17 .278 .386 .433 9.7 5.0 6.1
( HO) Juden vs LH 119 30 1 17 15 .300 .408 .380 10.3 5.8 5.1
( HO) Juden vs RH 85 21 4 6 19 .273 .345 .506 8.7 2.5 7.9
( HO) Kile vs LH 259 52 1 35 39 .241 .362 .343 8.0 5.4 6.0
( HO) Kile vs RH 242 58 3 19 48 .267 .344 .387 9.5 3.1 7.9
( HO) Mantei vs LH 7 2 0 1 0 .333 .429 .333 13.5 6.8 0.0
( HO) Mantei vs RH 5 1 0 1 3 .200 .286 .200 6.8 6.8 20.2
( HO) McDonald vs LH 217 36 1 27 27 .190 .292 .228 6.1 4.6 4.6
( HO) McDonald vs RH 192 31 8 30 27 .197 .338 .389 6.4 6.2 5.6
( HO) Portugal vs LH 478 117 12 44 44 .268 .332 .403 9.6 3.6 3.6
( HO) Portugal vs RH 444 93 12 39 68 .232 .300 .372 7.8 3.3 5.7
( HO) Veres,D vs LH 218 51 3 14 46 .258 .314 .384 9.3 2.6 8.4
( HO) Veres,D vs RH 181 31 3 13 34 .189 .251 .305 5.9 2.5 6.5
( HO) Wagner vs LH 384 80 7 41 50 .233 .313 .350 7.8 4.0 4.9
( HO) Wagner vs RH 377 84 12 31 53 .246 .314 .405 8.2 3.0 5.2
( HO) Wall vs LH 13 3 0 1 1 .250 .308 .333 10.1 3.4 3.4
( HO) Wall vs RH 8 1 1 2 2 .167 .333 .667 5.4 10.8 10.8
( HO) Williams,Br vs LH 144 35 0 13 35 .267 .338 .344 9.4 3.5 9.4
( HO) Williams,Br vs RH 123 26 0 15 28 .245 .336 .311 8.6 4.9 9.2
Houston vs LH 2733 605 41 268 410 .248 .325 .352 8.5 3.8 5.8
vs RH 3403 733 91 319 608 .242 .319 .387 8.2 3.6 6.8
Milwaukee Brewers
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( MI) Alvarez,W vs LH .000 .000 .000 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( MI) Alvarez,W vs RH .167 .167 .250 6 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 2.00
( MI) Bates vs LH .259 .463 .333 54 14 3 1 2 6 9 1 5.54
( MI) Bates vs RH .256 .347 .362 121 31 3 1 2 20 30 1 4.62
( MI) Boggs vs LH .308 .406 .402 143 44 5 3 1 24 15 10 5.39
( MI) Boggs vs RH .360 .454 .465 339 122 22 2 2 68 40 10 8.78
( MI) Brown,K vs LH .000 .000 .000 6 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.00
( MI) Brown,K vs RH .000 .000 .000 32 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 -----
( MI) Cora vs LH .241 .333 .302 87 21 8 0 0 7 7 4 3.26
( MI) Cora vs RH .333 .414 .390 261 87 16 1 1 21 28 1 6.36
( MI) Givens vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( MI) Givens vs RH .250 .250 .316 16 4 0 0 0 2 4 0 3.31
( MI) Greenwell vs LH .292 .562 .372 130 38 11 3 6 15 17 8 6.46
( MI) Greenwell vs RH .294 .444 .345 378 111 14 2 13 30 41 14 5.23
( MI) Grissom vs LH .202 .405 .316 84 17 2 0 5 14 7 2 4.05
( MI) Grissom vs RH .255 .359 .292 337 86 18 1 5 18 55 5 3.43
( MI) Jaha vs LH .393 .607 .439 61 24 1 0 4 5 12 1 10.85
( MI) Jaha vs RH .282 .472 .367 195 55 9 2 8 23 49 6 6.07
( MI) Karl vs LH .000 .000 .000 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( MI) Karl vs RH .125 .125 .111 16 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.57
( MI) Larkin vs LH .304 .480 .373 148 45 11 0 5 16 11 0 6.52
( MI) Larkin vs RH .302 .440 .370 477 144 30 6 8 50 49 0 6.97
( MI) Loretta vs LH .500 .500 .667 8 4 0 0 0 3 1 1 19.15
( MI) Loretta vs RH .520 .760 .500 25 13 3 0 1 1 3 0 18.44
( MI) Magadan vs LH .143 .171 .231 35 5 1 0 0 4 7 0 1.07
( MI) Magadan vs RH .316 .398 .410 339 107 25 0 1 55 60 1 7.03
( MI) Martin,P vs LH .000 .000 .000 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( MI) Martin,P vs RH .233 .356 .250 73 17 2 2 1 3 10 1 3.45
( MI) Matheny vs LH .333 .333 .394 30 10 0 0 0 3 1 0 5.04
( MI) Matheny vs RH .232 .303 .275 142 33 8 1 0 5 30 0 2.64
( MI) May vs LH .213 .280 .241 75 16 5 0 0 3 5 0 2.19
( MI) May vs RH .311 .484 .358 312 97 24 0 10 23 40 5 6.41
( MI) McGwire vs LH .278 .935 .477 108 30 2 0 23 40 22 2 17.23
( MI) McGwire vs RH .262 .692 .447 221 58 8 0 29 66 55 4 11.71
( MI) Moyer vs LH .000 .000 .000 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( MI) Moyer vs RH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( MI) Mulholland vs LH .200 .600 .333 5 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 7.34
( MI) Mulholland vs RH .200 .400 .267 10 2 0 1 0 2 2 0 3.98
( MI) Ogea vs LH .000 .000 .000 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 -0.00
( MI) Ogea vs RH .250 .250 .200 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.05
( MI) Sierra vs LH .154 .308 .279 52 8 2 0 2 9 10 2 2.61
( MI) Sierra vs RH .250 .386 .320 220 55 15 0 5 21 48 1 4.41
( MI) Smith,M vs LH .227 .341 .236 44 10 2 0 1 0 14 1 2.73
( MI) Smith,M vs RH .133 .400 .158 15 2 1 0 1 1 7 0 2.22
( MI) Tingley vs LH .340 .623 .353 53 18 2 2 3 6 17 0 7.45
( MI) Tingley vs RH .224 .422 .275 116 26 12 1 3 13 31 1 3.96
( MI) Tinsley vs LH .433 .582 .412 67 29 4 0 2 4 16 0 9.48
( MI) Tinsley vs RH .239 .344 .281 163 39 5 0 4 20 39 3 3.71
( MI) Valentin,Jos vs LH .125 .125 .222 8 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1.08
( MI) Valentin,Jos vs RH .125 .250 .200 8 1 1 0 0 1 3 0 1.88
( MI) Vaughn,G vs LH .259 .481 .349 54 14 4 1 2 8 10 1 5.58
( MI) Vaughn,G vs RH .179 .468 .270 156 28 4 1 13 18 47 6 3.77
( MI) Wilkins vs LH .000 .000 .215 51 0 0 0 0 13 21 4 0.27
( MI) Wilkins vs RH .175 .325 .333 160 28 0 0 8 37 55 2 3.88
Milwaukee vs LH .264 .453 .350 1339 353 63 11 56 183 221 39 5.32
vs RH .276 .422 .352 4172 1153 220 21 115 503 759 63 5.52
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( MI) Alvarez,W vs LH 194 48 6 22 23 .284 .368 .456 10.4 4.8 5.0
( MI) Alvarez,W vs RH 819 187 27 128 117 .273 .382 .450 9.6 6.6 6.0
( MI) Bailey vs LH 2 1 0 0 0 .500 .500 .500 27.0 0.0 0.0
( MI) Bailey vs RH 7 1 0 1 0 .167 .286 .167 5.4 5.4 0.0
( MI) Belinda vs LH 112 24 3 8 19 .233 .295 .417 7.9 2.6 6.3
( MI) Belinda vs RH 104 23 3 12 18 .258 .353 .382 9.4 4.9 7.4
( MI) Brown,K vs LH 610 135 7 44 83 .244 .310 .348 8.3 2.7 5.1
( MI) Brown,K vs RH 448 101 6 30 69 .243 .294 .364 8.0 2.4 5.5
( MI) Garces vs LH 18 4 0 3 4 .267 .389 .400 8.3 6.2 8.3
( MI) Garces vs RH 29 6 0 3 6 .250 .379 .250 9.5 4.8 9.5
( MI) Givens vs LH 171 30 1 23 14 .200 .298 .260 6.1 4.7 2.9
( MI) Givens vs RH 689 183 18 76 96 .301 .377 .448 10.8 4.5 5.6
( MI) Karl vs LH 123 28 1 12 17 .248 .312 .345 8.4 3.6 5.1
( MI) Karl vs RH 547 165 11 51 56 .336 .395 .509 13.1 4.0 4.4
( MI) Kiefer vs LH 44 5 1 7 11 .143 .295 .286 4.4 6.1 9.6
( MI) Kiefer vs RH 56 8 2 10 10 .186 .333 .349 6.2 7.7 7.7
( MI) Lloyd vs LH 21 6 2 2 1 .316 .381 .684 10.1 3.4 1.7
( MI) Lloyd vs RH 53 17 1 3 7 .362 .412 .489 15.8 2.8 6.5
( MI) Mahomes vs LH 55 10 1 9 1 .217 .345 .326 7.3 6.6 0.7
( MI) Mahomes vs RH 67 12 3 5 12 .194 .254 .387 6.1 2.5 6.1
( MI) McAndrew vs LH 34 11 0 4 2 .379 .441 .483 13.5 4.9 2.5
( MI) McAndrew vs RH 29 9 1 3 3 .346 .414 .577 17.4 5.8 5.8
( MI) Moyer vs LH 51 14 1 1 9 .280 .294 .360 10.8 0.8 6.9
( MI) Moyer vs RH 226 65 14 20 34 .320 .377 .586 12.1 3.7 6.3
( MI) Mulholland vs LH 129 26 2 11 9 .220 .285 .347 7.4 3.1 2.6
( MI) Mulholland vs RH 570 156 35 53 46 .307 .370 .559 11.6 3.9 3.4
( MI) Ogea vs LH 281 66 7 19 46 .256 .306 .403 8.9 2.6 6.2
( MI) Ogea vs RH 204 39 5 21 29 .212 .288 .332 6.9 3.7 5.1
( MI) Reyes,A vs LH 67 13 0 12 11 .255 .400 .353 9.0 8.3 7.6
( MI) Reyes,A vs RH 50 6 2 10 8 .167 .362 .389 5.2 8.7 7.0
( MI) Rightnowar vs LH 137 34 2 21 18 .309 .442 .464 11.3 7.0 6.0
( MI) Rightnowar vs RH 153 38 4 10 25 .271 .329 .400 9.7 2.5 6.4
( MI) Rosselli vs LH 48 9 3 8 4 .225 .354 .450 7.4 6.5 3.3
( MI) Rosselli vs RH 237 61 7 29 25 .295 .385 .420 10.8 5.1 4.4
Milwaukee vs LH 2097 464 37 206 272 .249 .328 .376 8.5 3.8 5.0
vs RH 4288 1077 139 465 561 .285 .362 .456 10.2 4.4 5.3
San Diego Padres
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( SD) Alomar,R vs LH .226 .296 .264 186 42 8 1 1 10 18 10 2.20
( SD) Alomar,R vs RH .284 .429 .338 450 128 26 9 7 38 54 10 5.28
( SD) Ausmus vs LH .324 .514 .369 74 24 2 3 2 7 12 0 6.82
( SD) Ausmus vs RH .293 .422 .351 249 73 13 5 3 26 48 10 4.98
( SD) Belliard vs LH .250 .250 .286 20 5 0 0 0 1 5 0 2.97
( SD) Belliard vs RH .194 .194 .297 31 6 0 0 0 5 4 0 1.90
( SD) Benes,An vs LH .043 .043 .033 23 1 0 0 0 0 12 0 0.14
( SD) Benes,An vs RH .138 .172 .176 29 4 1 0 0 2 13 0 1.20
( SD) Birkbeck vs LH .000 .000 .200 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0.35
( SD) Birkbeck vs RH .000 .000 .000 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 -----
( SD) Clemens vs LH .000 .000 .000 9 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.00
( SD) Clemens vs RH .091 .136 .143 22 2 1 0 0 2 7 0 0.90
( SD) DeLucia vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( SD) DeLucia vs RH .333 .333 .286 6 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 3.89
( SD) Dykstra vs LH .275 .294 .327 51 14 1 0 0 4 2 1 3.23
( SD) Dykstra vs RH .220 .310 .264 100 22 6 0 1 6 13 1 2.67
( SD) Ericks vs LH .125 .250 .125 8 1 1 0 0 0 4 0 0.96
( SD) Ericks vs RH .111 .111 .100 9 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.46
( SD) Gant vs LH .279 .543 .398 129 36 5 1 9 28 28 7 7.31
( SD) Gant vs RH .264 .556 .360 295 78 13 2 23 44 77 9 6.86
( SD) Gwynn,T vs LH .308 .421 .335 221 68 17 1 2 9 11 9 4.72
( SD) Gwynn,T vs RH .383 .490 .425 441 169 24 1 7 33 39 15 8.32
( SD) Johnson,B vs LH .235 .296 .264 81 19 2 0 1 4 15 1 2.74
( SD) Johnson,B vs RH .205 .318 .286 44 9 2 0 1 5 15 1 2.99
( SD) Lampkin vs LH .000 .000 .333 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1.17
( SD) Lampkin vs RH .277 .369 .405 65 18 3 0 1 10 5 0 6.37
( SD) Langston vs LH .125 .125 .111 16 2 0 0 0 0 7 1 0.27
( SD) Langston vs RH .043 .087 .071 23 1 1 0 0 0 6 1 0.16
( SD) Lieberthal vs LH .364 .455 .588 11 4 1 0 0 6 2 0 14.88
( SD) Lieberthal vs RH .133 .200 .158 15 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 0.81
( SD) Longmire vs LH .417 .833 .467 12 5 2 0 1 2 2 0 17.39
( SD) Longmire vs RH .306 .375 .425 72 22 2 0 1 13 16 0 6.88
( SD) Martinez,R vs LH .000 .000 .000 14 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.00
( SD) Martinez,R vs RH .158 .211 .170 38 6 2 0 0 2 13 0 1.43
( SD) McGriff vs LH .197 .338 .289 198 39 7 0 7 25 46 13 2.53
( SD) McGriff vs RH .320 .561 .401 419 134 21 1 26 58 96 11 8.06
( SD) Nixon vs LH .368 .402 .429 204 75 7 0 0 22 25 3 8.06
( SD) Nixon vs RH .270 .292 .318 418 113 9 0 0 29 72 4 3.41
( SD) Puckett vs LH .243 .431 .313 181 44 7 0 9 17 28 5 4.40
( SD) Puckett vs RH .252 .414 .306 476 120 35 0 14 34 81 22 3.80
( SD) Sanders,S vs LH .200 .200 .200 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.35
( SD) Sanders,S vs RH .364 .364 .462 33 12 0 0 0 5 5 0 8.20
( SD) Tarasco vs LH .207 .241 .258 29 6 1 0 0 2 3 0 2.59
( SD) Tarasco vs RH .303 .459 .371 185 56 8 0 7 19 28 1 6.55
( SD) Valentin,Joh vs LH .315 .464 .381 181 57 12 0 5 18 27 2 7.33
( SD) Valentin,Joh vs RH .259 .428 .361 374 97 24 0 13 50 57 9 5.68
( SD) Wehner vs LH .182 .182 .206 33 6 0 0 0 1 2 0 1.29
( SD) Wehner vs RH .333 .381 .362 42 14 0 1 0 3 2 1 5.08
( SD) Williams,Ma vs LH .389 .800 .453 95 37 9 0 10 11 18 2 14.67
( SD) Williams,Ma vs RH .303 .450 .368 218 66 9 1 7 23 42 6 6.05
San Diego vs LH .271 .396 .330 1719 465 78 6 42 161 263 50 4.54
vs RH .285 .422 .350 3836 1093 181 20 101 393 670 86 5.31
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( SD) Benes,An vs LH 484 136 11 42 82 .307 .364 .445 11.3 3.5 6.8
( SD) Benes,An vs RH 427 92 11 44 77 .241 .320 .382 8.1 3.9 6.8
( SD) Berumen vs LH 10 1 0 2 2 .125 .300 .250 3.9 7.7 7.7
( SD) Berumen vs RH 4 1 0 1 0 .500 .750 1.000 ---- ---- ----
( SD) Birkbeck vs LH 92 26 4 2 13 .295 .319 .477 11.5 0.9 5.8
( SD) Birkbeck vs RH 58 11 0 0 9 .186 .183 .237 6.1 0.0 5.0
( SD) Bochtler vs LH 91 15 3 14 27 .195 .319 .364 6.4 6.0 11.6
( SD) Bochtler vs RH 88 15 1 8 20 .188 .258 .237 6.0 3.2 7.9
( SD) Clemens vs LH 329 88 6 34 70 .311 .407 .463 11.5 4.4 9.1
( SD) Clemens vs RH 307 71 10 30 72 .266 .353 .442 9.5 4.0 9.6
( SD) DeLucia vs LH 174 40 5 18 31 .260 .333 .396 9.2 4.2 7.2
( SD) DeLucia vs RH 186 37 6 19 41 .223 .302 .373 7.5 3.9 8.3
( SD) Dishman vs LH 12 5 1 0 1 .417 .417 .833 19.3 0.0 3.9
( SD) Dishman vs RH 13 2 0 1 4 .167 .231 .167 4.9 2.5 9.8
( SD) Ericks vs LH 158 43 3 13 30 .297 .350 .421 10.9 3.3 7.6
( SD) Ericks vs RH 159 41 3 12 27 .289 .338 .408 10.4 3.1 6.9
( SD) Hermanson vs LH 7 4 2 0 0 .571 .571 1.429 36.0 0.0 0.0
( SD) Hermanson vs RH 4 2 2 2 0 1.000 1.000 4.000 ---- ---- ----
( SD) Hoffman vs LH 70 17 1 4 13 .258 .296 .439 9.0 2.1 6.9
( SD) Hoffman vs RH 89 19 5 5 22 .237 .276 .500 7.8 2.0 9.0
( SD) Langston vs LH 151 43 4 11 27 .307 .351 .521 10.7 2.7 6.7
( SD) Langston vs RH 599 177 17 45 97 .321 .371 .479 12.0 3.1 6.6
( SD) Lewis,R vs LH 22 4 0 1 5 .190 .227 .190 7.2 1.8 9.0
( SD) Lewis,R vs RH 19 7 1 0 7 .350 .333 .500 11.8 0.0 11.8
( SD) Martinez,R vs LH 543 131 17 60 70 .271 .350 .427 9.6 4.4 5.1
( SD) Martinez,R vs RH 478 103 11 48 81 .242 .322 .376 8.1 3.8 6.3
( SD) Sanders,S vs LH 287 71 10 15 67 .264 .302 .416 9.3 2.0 8.7
( SD) Sanders,S vs RH 222 51 8 7 46 .237 .268 .395 8.3 1.1 7.5
( SD) Scott vs LH 98 21 3 9 21 .259 .375 .432 9.3 4.0 9.3
( SD) Scott vs RH 130 27 2 13 23 .241 .331 .393 8.5 4.1 7.2
( SD) Tabaka vs LH 41 13 0 4 6 .342 .395 .421 12.5 3.9 5.8
( SD) Tabaka vs RH 64 11 1 13 6 .234 .419 .426 7.6 9.0 4.2
( SD) Villone vs LH 16 3 0 4 6 .231 .368 .308 7.4 9.8 14.7
( SD) Villone vs RH 8 2 0 3 1 .333 .500 .333 13.5 20.2 6.8
( SD) Worrell,Tod vs LH 152 39 3 15 33 .283 .351 .428 9.8 3.8 8.3
( SD) Worrell,Tod vs RH 112 29 2 7 22 .284 .327 .412 10.0 2.4 7.6
San Diego vs LH 2852 721 75 255 519 .280 .346 .432 10.0 3.5 7.2
vs RH 3413 801 91 289 637 .260 .325 .406 9.1 3.3 7.2
San Francisco Giants
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( SF) Bell,Da vs LH .381 .584 .398 113 43 16 2 1 4 17 0 10.31
( SF) Bell,Da vs RH .077 .077 .077 26 2 0 0 0 0 9 0 0.17
( SF) Benard vs LH .000 .000 .000 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( SF) Benard vs RH .600 .700 .619 20 12 2 0 0 1 4 0 29.79
( SF) Bonilla vs LH .313 .482 .376 195 61 4 4 7 21 25 9 6.01
( SF) Bonilla vs RH .311 .533 .350 456 142 29 6 20 28 86 11 6.49
( SF) Brewington vs LH .500 .500 .500 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13.50
( SF) Brewington vs RH .267 .267 .267 15 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 2.62
( SF) Burkett vs LH .077 .077 .067 13 1 0 0 0 0 8 0 0.26
( SF) Burkett vs RH .125 .188 .189 32 4 2 0 0 1 11 0 1.33
( SF) Clark,W vs LH .222 .333 .306 63 14 4 0 1 8 9 2 3.40
( SF) Clark,W vs RH .272 .429 .344 371 101 19 0 13 41 49 3 5.36
( SF) Daulton vs LH .150 .200 .227 20 3 1 0 0 2 5 0 1.82
( SF) Daulton vs RH .224 .386 .327 228 51 12 2 7 33 39 4 4.49
( SF) Decker vs LH .118 .206 .225 34 4 0 0 1 5 5 0 1.68
( SF) Decker vs RH .178 .311 .302 45 8 0 0 2 7 9 0 3.49
( SF) Donnels vs LH .000 .000 .000 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 -----
( SF) Donnels vs RH .333 .429 .348 21 7 2 0 0 1 4 0 6.12
( SF) Fernandez,A vs LH .200 .200 .182 20 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 1.37
( SF) Fernandez,A vs RH .194 .194 .194 36 7 0 0 0 0 11 3 0.66
( SF) Fernandez,S vs LH .000 .000 .167 9 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0.47
( SF) Fernandez,S vs RH .000 .000 .000 20 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0.00
( SF) James,C vs LH .100 .133 .100 30 3 1 0 0 0 6 2 0.00
( SF) James,C vs RH .000 .000 .000 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( SF) Johnson,L vs LH .298 .373 .328 225 67 6 4 1 10 18 4 4.51
( SF) Johnson,L vs RH .301 .403 .325 481 145 14 10 5 15 43 16 4.27
( SF) Kruk vs LH .233 .300 .343 30 7 2 0 0 5 9 1 3.64
( SF) Kruk vs RH .314 .407 .399 118 37 5 0 2 17 26 4 5.91
( SF) Liriano vs LH .354 .492 .462 65 23 7 1 0 10 9 0 10.50
( SF) Liriano vs RH .238 .305 .283 105 25 7 0 0 6 18 2 2.81
( SF) Lopez,A vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( SF) Lopez,A vs RH ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( SF) McDowell,J vs LH .095 .095 .136 21 2 0 0 0 1 10 1 0.28
( SF) McDowell,J vs RH .147 .176 .225 34 5 1 0 0 3 13 0 1.58
( SF) McDowell,R vs LH 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 INF
( SF) McDowell,R vs RH .000 .000 .250 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0.58
( SF) Newson vs LH .111 .222 .200 9 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1.35
( SF) Newson vs RH .258 .398 .395 93 24 0 2 3 21 26 2 5.61
( SF) O'Brien vs LH .184 .316 .304 114 21 6 0 3 19 24 3 3.19
( SF) O'Brien vs RH .245 .561 .373 98 24 1 0 10 18 18 3 7.30
( SF) Phillips,T vs LH .270 .455 .412 178 48 12 0 7 42 58 5 6.81
( SF) Phillips,T vs RH .259 .442 .381 421 109 20 3 17 81 114 1 6.52
( SF) Plantier vs LH .275 .275 .327 51 14 0 0 0 4 13 1 3.42
( SF) Plantier vs RH .270 .374 .333 115 31 3 0 3 10 30 3 4.29
( SF) Ramirez vs LH .415 .634 .497 164 68 9 0 9 27 35 4 13.89
( SF) Ramirez vs RH .277 .478 .374 364 101 11 4 18 57 88 10 6.25
( SF) Reed,S vs LH .000 .000 .000 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( SF) Reed,S vs RH .250 .250 .333 4 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1.60
( SF) Ripken vs LH .275 .487 .330 189 52 15 2 7 15 23 3 5.86
( SF) Ripken vs RH .254 .351 .302 433 110 22 1 6 31 50 17 3.36
( SF) Service vs LH .333 .333 .333 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.50
( SF) Service vs RH ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( SF) Simms vs LH .278 .643 .404 126 35 4 0 14 25 30 7 8.35
( SF) Simms vs RH .160 .400 .192 25 4 0 0 2 1 8 1 1.94
( SF) Swift vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( SF) Swift vs RH .125 .500 .167 16 2 0 0 2 1 4 0 1.65
( SF) VanLnd'gham vs LH .200 .400 .200 15 3 0 0 1 0 7 0 2.70
( SF) VanLnd'gham vs RH .150 .400 .190 20 3 2 0 1 1 9 1 1.77
( SF) Whitaker vs LH .143 .143 .250 7 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1.42
( SF) Whitaker vs RH .269 .509 .320 279 75 13 0 18 21 45 12 5.20
San Francisco vs LH .279 .437 .356 1714 479 88 13 52 201 325 43 5.56
vs RH .266 .422 .335 3889 1034 165 28 129 397 738 94 4.85
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( SF) Beck vs LH 112 32 5 4 20 .305 .348 .505 11.4 1.4 7.1
( SF) Beck vs RH 122 37 7 12 16 .336 .406 .573 13.1 4.3 5.7
( SF) Brewington vs LH 133 34 1 15 18 .288 .370 .347 10.2 4.5 5.4
( SF) Brewington vs RH 152 32 4 14 23 .234 .312 .350 7.8 3.4 5.6
( SF) Burkett vs LH 451 132 14 23 61 .306 .340 .487 11.4 2.0 5.3
( SF) Burkett vs RH 425 101 12 30 63 .256 .311 .397 9.0 2.7 5.6
( SF) Christ'nsen vs LH 11 1 0 0 3 .111 .273 .111 3.0 0.0 9.0
( SF) Christ'nsen vs RH 15 3 1 1 4 .231 .333 .462 7.4 2.5 9.8
( SF) Fernandez,A vs LH 467 114 11 44 83 .266 .329 .403 9.5 3.7 6.9
( SF) Fernandez,A vs RH 438 82 9 29 98 .201 .254 .343 6.8 2.4 8.1
( SF) Fernandez,S vs LH 103 17 2 10 29 .185 .257 .283 5.8 3.4 9.9
( SF) Fernandez,S vs RH 403 86 19 35 97 .234 .303 .422 7.9 3.2 8.9
( SF) Hernandez,X vs LH 142 38 4 7 31 .284 .324 .463 10.3 1.9 8.4
( SF) Hernandez,X vs RH 178 52 6 17 39 .325 .388 .519 12.6 4.1 9.5
( SF) Loaiza vs LH 3 1 0 0 0 .333 .333 .333 13.5 0.0 0.0
( SF) Loaiza vs RH 0 0 0 0 0 ---- ---- ---- 0.0 0.0 0.0
( SF) Lopez,A vs LH 49 13 0 5 10 .295 .367 .295 10.6 4.1 8.2
( SF) Lopez,A vs RH 26 2 2 1 6 .083 .154 .333 2.5 1.2 7.4
( SF) McDowell,J vs LH 558 139 10 55 72 .276 .345 .386 9.6 3.8 5.0
( SF) McDowell,J vs RH 506 120 13 38 76 .254 .306 .378 8.6 2.7 5.4
( SF) McDowell,R vs LH 193 45 1 20 26 .266 .354 .331 9.1 4.1 5.3
( SF) McDowell,R vs RH 209 59 4 11 30 .311 .368 .447 11.5 2.2 5.9
( SF) Reed,S vs LH 148 34 7 5 27 .231 .250 .401 7.9 1.2 6.3
( SF) Reed,S vs RH 132 25 3 7 36 .198 .246 .310 6.6 1.8 9.4
( SF) Service vs LH 109 33 6 11 21 .340 .414 .588 12.9 4.3 8.2
( SF) Service vs RH 121 25 2 18 24 .255 .390 .357 9.5 6.8 9.1
( SF) Swift vs LH 158 43 5 19 21 .309 .392 .468 12.0 5.3 5.8
( SF) Swift vs RH 181 35 8 19 27 .217 .305 .435 7.0 3.8 5.4
( SF) Thompson,M vs LH 8 4 0 0 1 .500 .500 .750 27.0 0.0 6.8
( SF) Thompson,M vs RH 10 5 0 0 0 .455 .417 .545 22.5 0.0 0.0
( SF) VanLnd'gham vs LH 276 65 11 22 46 .256 .317 .437 8.6 2.9 6.1
( SF) VanLnd'gham vs RH 300 76 10 24 61 .270 .319 .450 9.9 3.1 7.9
San Francisco vs LH 2921 745 77 240 469 .278 .337 .421 9.9 3.2 6.2
vs RH 3218 740 100 256 600 .250 .313 .406 8.7 3.0 7.1
Washington Senators
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( WA) Blauser vs LH .197 .273 .303 66 13 2 0 1 10 16 0 3.18
( WA) Blauser vs RH .226 .347 .319 199 45 6 0 6 24 42 2 3.85
( WA) Brandenburg vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( WA) Brandenburg vs RH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( WA) Browne vs LH .286 .286 .333 7 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 4.17
( WA) Browne vs RH .234 .319 .308 47 11 1 0 1 5 5 2 2.82
( WA) Burks vs LH .291 .454 .387 141 41 6 1 5 22 31 3 6.83
( WA) Burks vs RH .153 .242 .254 157 24 2 0 4 22 45 3 2.10
( WA) Canseco vs LH .300 .544 .352 160 48 5 2 10 12 44 5 6.78
( WA) Canseco vs RH .261 .428 .335 306 80 18 0 11 30 74 13 4.72
( WA) Finley,C vs LH .167 .333 .167 6 1 1 0 0 0 3 0 1.80
( WA) Finley,C vs RH .095 .095 .095 21 2 0 0 0 0 8 0 0.27
( WA) Garcia,C vs LH .323 .516 .364 93 30 7 1 3 6 14 1 7.35
( WA) Garcia,C vs RH .256 .384 .293 211 54 15 0 4 10 38 1 4.03
( WA) Gil vs LH .086 .123 .135 81 7 3 0 0 5 32 0 0.55
( WA) Gil vs RH .168 .317 .215 161 27 5 2 5 10 60 1 2.30
( WA) Greer vs LH .294 .553 .368 85 25 5 1 5 10 15 1 7.86
( WA) Greer vs RH .271 .399 .347 351 95 18 3 7 44 51 7 5.02
( WA) Hamilton,D vs LH .200 .311 .255 45 9 3 1 0 4 6 2 2.49
( WA) Hamilton,D vs RH .283 .426 .360 237 67 21 5 1 27 22 4 5.91
( WA) Hanson vs LH .000 .000 .000 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.00
( WA) Hanson vs RH .056 .056 .095 18 1 0 0 0 1 6 1 0.15
( WA) Haselman vs LH .225 .425 .295 40 9 0 1 2 4 10 1 3.97
( WA) Haselman vs RH .195 .268 .295 82 16 3 0 1 10 18 4 2.28
( WA) Howard,D vs LH .364 .515 .395 33 12 3 1 0 3 5 1 7.91
( WA) Howard,D vs RH .212 .277 .260 184 39 10 1 0 12 29 6 2.30
( WA) Jefferies vs LH .384 .534 .448 146 56 11 1 3 17 15 5 9.69
( WA) Jefferies vs RH .317 .426 .358 331 105 17 2 5 20 27 7 5.69
( WA) Maldonado vs LH .343 .505 .435 105 36 8 0 3 17 28 3 8.00
( WA) Maldonado vs RH .264 .495 .358 91 24 12 0 3 14 23 5 5.41
( WA) Martinez,Da vs LH .500 .727 .500 22 11 1 2 0 1 3 1 16.47
( WA) Martinez,Da vs RH .302 .399 .364 301 91 17 3 2 29 46 6 5.58
( WA) Martinez,De vs LH .333 .333 .333 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 4.50
( WA) Martinez,De vs RH .176 .294 .176 17 3 2 0 0 0 6 1 1.06
( WA) Mimbs vs LH .143 .143 .143 7 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.64
( WA) Mimbs vs RH .250 .250 .222 8 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 2.16
( WA) Oliver,D vs LH .500 .500 .500 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 13.50
( WA) Oliver,D vs RH .000 .000 .111 8 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0.10
( WA) Pavlik vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( WA) Pavlik vs RH .000 .000 .000 8 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.00
( WA) Rodriguez,I vs LH .326 .486 .326 138 45 12 2 2 1 6 3 5.18
( WA) Rodriguez,I vs RH .312 .451 .349 346 108 26 2 6 17 21 7 5.86
( WA) Scarsone vs LH .267 .480 .343 150 40 8 3 6 16 41 0 6.26
( WA) Scarsone vs RH .252 .393 .292 107 27 4 1 3 5 35 2 3.57
( WA) Snow vs LH .206 .289 .250 180 37 4 1 3 10 33 9 2.02
( WA) Snow vs RH .287 .466 .342 352 101 15 0 16 27 49 7 5.67
( WA) Thome vs LH .306 .408 .465 98 30 7 0 1 29 24 0 8.50
( WA) Thome vs RH .324 .602 .439 389 126 17 2 29 80 88 8 10.49
( WA) West vs LH .333 .333 .333 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.50
( WA) West vs RH .250 .250 .250 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2.25
Washington vs LH .282 .437 .349 1630 460 87 17 44 170 340 35 5.50
vs RH .265 .407 .332 4002 1062 210 21 105 392 720 89 4.77
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( WA) Alberro vs LH 20 7 0 2 5 .389 .455 .500 17.2 4.9 12.3
( WA) Alberro vs RH 13 1 0 3 1 .111 .333 .222 3.0 9.0 3.0
( WA) Brandenburg vs LH 63 26 4 2 10 .426 .444 .689 20.1 1.5 7.7
( WA) Brandenburg vs RH 56 18 6 7 9 .367 .448 .776 14.7 5.7 7.4
( WA) Clark,Te vs LH 76 20 3 5 9 .274 .312 .438 10.0 2.5 4.5
( WA) Clark,Te vs RH 85 26 5 10 16 .342 .414 .605 13.8 5.3 8.5
( WA) Finley,C vs LH 155 31 5 17 39 .226 .312 .387 7.3 4.0 9.2
( WA) Finley,C vs RH 666 159 21 59 143 .266 .338 .427 9.5 3.5 8.5
( WA) Hanson vs LH 456 118 7 36 78 .282 .336 .415 10.1 3.1 6.7
( WA) Hanson vs RH 355 86 5 27 60 .268 .324 .361 9.4 3.0 6.6
( WA) Harnisch vs LH 238 57 7 16 46 .261 .315 .399 9.2 2.6 7.4
( WA) Harnisch vs RH 212 61 10 11 35 .310 .349 .558 11.7 2.1 6.7
( WA) Honeycutt vs LH 69 11 1 9 9 .183 .286 .267 5.8 4.8 4.8
( WA) Honeycutt vs RH 87 29 6 9 13 .363 .413 .637 14.8 4.6 6.6
( WA) Martinez,De vs LH 444 110 15 25 45 .262 .306 .424 9.0 2.1 3.7
( WA) Martinez,De vs RH 483 120 15 30 72 .268 .321 .426 9.4 2.4 5.7
( WA) Mimbs vs LH 148 31 0 22 19 .250 .367 .298 8.2 5.8 5.0
( WA) Mimbs vs RH 488 110 13 64 64 .264 .356 .406 9.2 5.4 5.4
( WA) Nichting vs LH 13 3 0 2 1 .273 .385 .273 10.1 6.8 3.4
( WA) Nichting vs RH 9 3 0 0 1 .333 .333 .444 11.6 0.0 3.9
( WA) Nitkowski vs LH 6 3 0 1 0 .600 .667 .600 27.0 9.0 0.0
( WA) Nitkowski vs RH 20 4 0 2 3 .222 .300 .278 7.2 3.6 5.4
( WA) Oliver,D vs LH 47 13 0 9 3 .325 .431 .350 12.5 8.7 2.9
( WA) Oliver,D vs RH 239 51 6 29 37 .250 .349 .407 8.3 4.7 6.0
( WA) Olson vs LH 82 19 1 7 17 .253 .317 .373 8.7 3.2 7.8
( WA) Olson vs RH 84 23 7 18 10 .359 .494 .750 15.9 12.5 6.9
( WA) Pavlik vs LH 382 86 7 51 61 .265 .361 .394 9.1 5.4 6.5
( WA) Pavlik vs RH 363 72 6 35 65 .226 .307 .351 7.3 3.6 6.6
( WA) Rhodes,A vs LH 51 7 1 5 12 .149 .226 .213 4.7 3.4 8.1
( WA) Rhodes,A vs RH 183 28 7 31 36 .187 .324 .373 6.0 6.7 7.8
( WA) Smith,L vs LH 80 16 1 10 9 .242 .342 .394 8.6 5.4 4.9
( WA) Smith,L vs RH 86 16 1 7 16 .203 .273 .266 6.9 3.0 6.9
( WA) West vs LH 40 8 2 4 5 .222 .300 .389 6.5 3.3 4.1
( WA) West vs RH 194 34 3 26 28 .206 .314 .321 7.0 5.3 5.7
( WA) Whiteside vs LH 122 23 2 5 27 .198 .236 .259 6.7 1.5 7.8
( WA) Whiteside vs RH 150 35 4 14 37 .257 .327 .390 9.2 3.7 9.7
Washington vs LH 2492 589 56 228 395 .262 .329 .393 9.1 3.5 6.1
vs RH 3773 876 115 382 646 .263 .340 .423 9.2 4.0 6.8
Los Angeles Dodgers
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( LA) Ashley vs LH .241 .448 .323 58 14 0 0 4 6 24 5 3.70
( LA) Ashley vs RH .256 .423 .293 78 20 1 0 4 4 29 2 4.11
( LA) Astacio vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( LA) Astacio vs RH .500 .500 .333 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.84
( LA) Barberie vs LH .139 .250 .326 36 5 1 0 1 9 6 2 2.68
( LA) Barberie vs RH .265 .350 .358 117 31 7 0 1 15 15 0 5.10
( LA) Bullett vs LH .256 .385 .293 39 10 3 1 0 2 5 4 2.52
( LA) Bullett vs RH .188 .250 .241 80 15 1 2 0 3 23 0 2.09
( LA) Cone vs LH .000 .000 .000 15 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.00
( LA) Cone vs RH .081 .081 .093 37 3 0 0 0 1 15 1 0.28
( LA) Fonville vs LH .284 .313 .342 134 38 2 1 0 12 22 1 4.75
( LA) Fonville vs RH .292 .318 .322 195 57 5 0 0 8 32 3 3.86
( LA) Goodwin,T vs LH .250 .280 .321 200 50 6 0 0 20 38 3 3.66
( LA) Goodwin,T vs RH .297 .367 .338 482 143 12 2 6 25 80 3 5.08
( LA) Hernandez,C vs LH .167 .167 .167 6 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.90
( LA) Hernandez,C vs RH .071 .095 .152 42 3 1 0 0 4 17 5 0.13
( LA) Hill,G vs LH .265 .537 .313 136 36 6 2 9 8 41 2 5.51
( LA) Hill,G vs RH .252 .442 .296 389 98 21 4 15 22 69 12 4.22
( LA) Hill,K vs LH .071 .071 .062 14 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.23
( LA) Hill,K vs RH .087 .087 .192 23 2 0 0 0 3 4 0 0.69
( LA) Hol'ndsw'th vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( LA) Hol'ndsw'th vs RH .091 .091 .286 11 1 0 0 0 3 2 0 1.37
( LA) Lockhart vs LH .314 .490 .351 51 16 7 1 0 2 5 0 7.33
( LA) Lockhart vs RH .350 .489 .383 237 83 16 1 5 14 31 0 7.35
( LA) Martinez,PJ vs LH .000 .000 .133 11 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 0.20
( LA) Martinez,PJ vs RH .054 .054 .111 37 2 0 0 0 0 20 1 0.31
( LA) McGee vs LH .195 .244 .244 41 8 2 0 0 2 9 0 2.19
( LA) McGee vs RH .254 .348 .271 138 35 5 4 0 3 30 4 3.11
( LA) Mejia vs LH .333 .333 .500 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.51
( LA) Mejia vs RH .241 .586 .267 29 7 1 0 3 1 6 0 3.88
( LA) Nomo vs LH .100 .100 .143 10 1 0 0 0 1 5 0 0.91
( LA) Nomo vs RH .128 .128 .096 39 5 0 0 0 0 18 0 0.65
( LA) Palmeiro vs LH .258 .479 .311 190 49 12 0 10 14 30 6 4.66
( LA) Palmeiro vs RH .318 .608 .390 424 135 20 2 33 49 55 13 8.55
( LA) Parent vs LH .277 .745 .320 94 26 2 0 14 6 33 0 9.16
( LA) Parent vs RH .292 .596 .347 89 26 0 0 9 6 17 2 7.39
( LA) Pendleton vs LH .324 .449 .346 176 57 16 0 2 9 25 1 5.98
( LA) Pendleton vs RH .271 .391 .305 468 127 21 1 11 21 74 3 4.21
( LA) Piazza vs LH .299 .545 .354 134 40 6 0 9 11 26 6 6.52
( LA) Piazza vs RH .349 .587 .392 387 135 11 0 27 27 76 17 7.92
( LA) Ruffin,J vs LH 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 INF
( LA) Ruffin,J vs RH ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( LA) Seanez vs LH ---- ---- 1.000 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 INF
( LA) Seanez vs RH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( LA) Sele vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( LA) Sele vs RH .000 .000 .000 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( LA) Urbani vs LH .000 .000 .500 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 3.51
( LA) Urbani vs RH .667 1.667 .714 6 4 0 0 2 1 0 0 98.94
( LA) Valdes,I vs LH .167 .167 .111 12 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.96
( LA) Valdes,I vs RH .024 .024 .067 42 1 0 0 0 2 19 0 0.13
( LA) Vizcaino vs LH .340 .451 .374 153 52 8 3 1 9 22 4 6.13
( LA) Vizcaino vs RH .266 .330 .308 406 108 13 5 1 22 64 6 3.55
( LA) White,Dev vs LH .221 .295 .275 95 21 7 0 0 6 14 2 2.65
( LA) White,Dev vs RH .276 .461 .328 330 91 19 6 10 24 82 3 5.62
Los Angeles vs LH .266 .417 .316 1615 429 78 8 50 119 328 37 4.58
vs RH .276 .419 .321 4121 1137 155 27 127 263 786 75 4.75
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( LA) Astacio vs LH 88 13 0 4 13 .157 .209 .205 4.9 1.5 4.9
( LA) Astacio vs RH 127 25 1 11 26 .216 .285 .336 7.0 3.1 7.3
( LA) Cone vs LH 470 84 10 48 87 .201 .290 .321 6.7 3.8 6.9
( LA) Cone vs RH 524 90 13 24 117 .180 .219 .313 5.7 1.5 7.4
( LA) Embree vs LH 8 1 0 1 1 .143 .250 .143 2.7 2.7 2.7
( LA) Embree vs RH 39 14 2 4 5 .412 .487 .618 18.9 5.4 6.8
( LA) Hill,K vs LH 350 99 10 42 30 .324 .407 .493 12.2 5.2 3.7
( LA) Hill,K vs RH 433 109 17 39 60 .276 .342 .466 9.9 3.5 5.4
( LA) Martinez,PJ vs LH 435 106 10 36 74 .269 .338 .406 9.5 3.2 6.6
( LA) Martinez,PJ vs RH 561 118 20 37 134 .232 .299 .397 7.8 2.4 8.8
( LA) Mathews,TJ vs LH 57 11 0 5 15 .208 .271 .283 6.9 3.1 9.4
( LA) Mathews,TJ vs RH 61 10 0 4 16 .169 .212 .237 5.4 2.2 8.6
( LA) Nomo vs LH 429 75 8 45 123 .195 .278 .319 6.4 3.8 10.4
( LA) Nomo vs RH 518 68 11 48 156 .144 .225 .236 4.5 3.2 10.3
( LA) Osuna vs LH 18 4 1 0 5 .222 .222 .389 8.3 0.0 10.4
( LA) Osuna vs RH 29 5 2 3 8 .185 .258 .444 6.4 3.9 10.3
( LA) Park vs LH 5 1 0 2 1 .333 .600 .333 13.5 27.0 13.5
( LA) Park vs RH 18 6 3 2 8 .375 .444 1.000 16.2 5.4 21.6
( LA) Parrett vs LH 129 33 2 14 17 .289 .367 .395 10.2 4.3 5.3
( LA) Parrett vs RH 154 36 5 12 26 .257 .312 .400 8.9 3.0 6.4
( LA) Ruffin,J vs LH 31 2 0 6 6 .080 .258 .120 2.2 6.8 6.8
( LA) Ruffin,J vs RH 40 6 0 5 10 .162 .250 .189 5.2 4.4 8.7
( LA) Seanez vs LH 34 10 3 3 4 .323 .382 .677 13.5 4.1 5.4
( LA) Seanez vs RH 37 13 3 1 5 .351 .359 .676 15.3 1.2 5.9
( LA) Sele vs LH 44 15 0 4 10 .375 .432 .425 15.0 4.0 10.0
( LA) Sele vs RH 52 9 3 9 9 .205 .327 .409 6.6 6.6 6.6
( LA) Urbani vs LH 43 1 0 5 8 .027 .140 .027 0.7 3.6 5.7
( LA) Urbani vs RH 93 25 4 8 11 .298 .366 .500 11.2 3.6 4.9
( LA) Valdes,I vs LH 433 95 13 28 72 .237 .290 .401 8.4 2.5 6.3
( LA) Valdes,I vs RH 558 103 7 38 118 .198 .255 .298 6.6 2.4 7.6
( LA) Valdes,M vs LH 19 3 0 4 2 .214 .421 .214 7.4 9.8 4.9
( LA) Valdes,M vs RH 16 3 0 2 2 .214 .312 .214 6.8 4.5 4.5
( LA) Wetteland vs LH 114 14 1 3 32 .127 .150 .173 3.9 0.8 8.9
( LA) Wetteland vs RH 125 24 4 4 29 .197 .219 .361 6.4 1.1 7.8
( LA) Williams,T vs LH 15 4 2 0 0 .267 .267 .667 9.0 0.0 0.0
( LA) Williams,T vs RH 14 2 0 3 2 .222 .385 .222 6.8 10.1 6.8
Los Angeles vs LH 2722 571 60 250 500 .233 .307 .362 7.9 3.5 7.0
vs RH 3405 666 95 258 744 .212 .275 .353 7.1 2.7 7.9
Minnesota Twins
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( MN) Bergman vs LH .000 .000 .000 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.00
( MN) Bergman vs RH .125 .125 .125 8 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.48
( MN) Boskie vs LH .000 .000 .000 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( MN) Boskie vs RH .286 .286 .375 7 2 0 0 0 1 4 0 4.58
( MN) Branson vs LH .167 .333 .231 12 2 0 1 0 1 5 0 2.65
( MN) Branson vs RH .226 .370 .276 319 72 18 2 8 19 74 9 3.30
( MN) Brito vs LH .000 .000 .200 8 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0.35
( MN) Brito vs RH .667 .667 .667 3 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 36.00
( MN) Carreon vs LH .250 .333 .304 84 21 4 0 1 5 9 2 3.32
( MN) Carreon vs RH .298 .481 .342 181 54 15 0 6 9 18 1 6.39
( MN) Cole vs LH .111 .111 .111 9 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.38
( MN) Cole vs RH .267 .360 .321 75 20 2 1 1 6 19 0 3.78
( MN) Coomer vs LH .290 .355 .353 31 9 0 1 0 3 4 3 2.00
( MN) Coomer vs RH .200 .500 .294 30 6 0 0 3 4 7 2 3.25
( MN) Cordova vs LH .306 .470 .375 134 41 4 3 4 12 23 7 6.07
( MN) Cordova vs RH .248 .412 .342 391 97 21 2 13 41 103 8 5.01
( MN) Drabek vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( MN) Drabek vs RH .500 .500 .444 8 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 10.85
( MN) Duncan vs LH .325 .525 .337 80 26 5 1 3 3 4 1 6.37
( MN) Duncan vs RH .287 .446 .324 157 45 8 4 3 9 23 5 4.70
( MN) Grace,Ma vs LH .236 .389 .293 144 34 10 0 4 12 8 1 4.01
( MN) Grace,Ma vs RH .361 .570 .413 477 172 58 3 12 43 41 6 9.85
( MN) Hocking vs LH .333 1.000 .333 3 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 15.84
( MN) Hocking vs RH .267 .400 .312 15 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 1.17
( MN) Lawton vs LH .000 .000 .000 7 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.00
( MN) Lawton vs RH .327 .481 .333 52 17 0 1 2 0 13 3 4.69
( MN) Lemke vs LH .255 .382 .322 102 26 7 0 2 13 5 5 3.81
( MN) Lemke vs RH .208 .287 .256 355 74 13 6 1 22 31 8 2.37
( MN) Lewis,D vs LH .200 .252 .288 135 27 3 2 0 16 16 3 2.18
( MN) Lewis,D vs RH .259 .280 .312 375 97 4 2 0 24 39 7 3.24
( MN) Manto vs LH .235 .523 .329 132 31 2 0 12 17 33 3 5.72
( MN) Manto vs RH .107 .250 .167 28 3 1 0 1 2 9 2 0.75
( MN) Meares vs LH .275 .451 .333 102 28 6 3 2 7 21 5 4.75
( MN) Meares vs RH .265 .430 .300 321 85 19 2 10 12 57 13 3.94
( MN) Merullo vs LH .267 .333 .340 45 12 3 0 0 5 6 2 3.42
( MN) Merullo vs RH .304 .393 .407 112 34 10 0 0 17 19 7 5.45
( MN) Munoz,P vs LH .265 .478 .333 136 36 8 0 7 15 35 1 6.04
( MN) Munoz,P vs RH .353 .541 .385 218 77 14 0 9 9 33 4 8.11
( MN) Pagnozzi vs LH .130 .217 .178 69 9 3 0 1 4 9 3 0.83
( MN) Pagnozzi vs RH .195 .295 .233 190 37 15 2 0 8 33 6 1.85
( MN) Radke vs LH .000 .000 .250 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0.58
( MN) Radke vs RH .111 .222 .111 9 1 1 0 0 0 4 0 0.75
( MN) Reboulet vs LH .342 .461 .419 76 26 6 0 1 9 6 1 7.72
( MN) Reboulet vs RH .229 .280 .260 118 27 6 0 0 4 19 0 2.77
( MN) Reed,Je vs LH .188 .188 .350 16 3 0 0 0 3 3 1 2.34
( MN) Reed,Je vs RH .212 .221 .294 113 24 1 0 0 13 23 4 2.16
( MN) Smiley vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( MN) Smiley vs RH .143 .143 .111 14 2 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.76
( MN) Stahoviak vs LH .222 .370 .250 27 6 4 0 0 1 5 0 2.70
( MN) Stahoviak vs RH .265 .398 .345 211 56 19 0 3 22 54 0 5.41
( MN) Stevens vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( MN) Stevens vs RH .667 .667 .667 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.00
( MN) Trombley vs LH .000 .000 .333 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1.17
( MN) Trombley vs RH .100 .100 .091 10 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0.37
Minnesota vs LH .249 .399 .316 1472 367 70 12 42 138 230 42 4.06
vs RH .267 .399 .321 4101 1094 245 26 82 285 690 105 4.37
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( MN) Arocha vs LH 92 25 1 10 11 .305 .375 .415 11.2 4.5 4.9
( MN) Arocha vs RH 124 38 10 9 7 .339 .402 .661 13.2 3.1 2.4
( MN) Barton vs LH 12 1 0 2 0 .100 .250 .100 2.7 5.4 0.0
( MN) Barton vs RH 9 3 0 0 1 .333 .333 .444 13.5 0.0 4.5
( MN) Bergman vs LH 286 74 12 30 47 .292 .372 .490 10.6 4.3 6.8
( MN) Bergman vs RH 286 72 11 27 45 .279 .347 .473 10.2 3.8 6.4
( MN) Boskie vs LH 353 97 10 23 26 .300 .353 .449 11.1 2.6 3.0
( MN) Boskie vs RH 345 100 10 20 43 .313 .357 .511 11.3 2.3 4.9
( MN) Brantley vs LH 109 26 7 8 21 .260 .315 .500 9.4 2.9 7.6
( MN) Brantley vs RH 89 15 0 3 17 .179 .222 .238 5.5 1.1 6.3
( MN) Drabek vs LH 365 126 9 31 44 .381 .433 .550 15.5 3.8 5.4
( MN) Drabek vs RH 391 113 9 30 82 .316 .369 .464 11.9 3.2 8.6
( MN) Gardner vs LH 186 54 7 21 35 .329 .409 .537 13.4 5.2 8.7
( MN) Gardner vs RH 182 31 5 20 32 .193 .289 .298 6.1 3.9 6.3
( MN) Guthrie vs LH 76 16 1 7 9 .242 .333 .364 8.6 3.8 4.9
( MN) Guthrie vs RH 79 23 1 8 11 .329 .407 .443 12.4 4.3 5.9
( MN) Linton vs LH 37 11 3 3 1 .324 .378 .647 12.4 3.4 1.1
( MN) Linton vs RH 40 8 2 5 4 .242 .366 .515 8.3 5.2 4.2
( MN) Olivares vs LH 92 26 2 8 5 .310 .362 .417 11.1 3.4 2.1
( MN) Olivares vs RH 76 15 2 12 12 .234 .359 .375 7.6 6.1 6.1
( MN) Parra vs LH 14 4 0 1 1 .308 .357 .385 13.5 3.4 3.4
( MN) Parra vs RH 12 3 1 1 3 .273 .333 .545 10.1 3.4 10.1
( MN) Pena,A vs LH 121 25 5 10 36 .225 .289 .414 7.7 3.1 11.0
( MN) Pena,A vs RH 138 27 6 6 36 .201 .232 .351 6.8 1.5 9.0
( MN) Poole vs LH 49 14 0 4 10 .318 .388 .455 11.8 3.4 8.4
( MN) Poole vs RH 101 21 3 11 26 .241 .340 .379 8.2 4.3 10.2
( MN) Pugh vs LH 108 36 5 7 10 .353 .393 .539 13.9 2.7 3.9
( MN) Pugh vs RH 77 17 6 5 8 .239 .299 .521 8.1 2.4 3.8
( MN) Radke vs LH 398 105 11 35 36 .292 .354 .446 10.9 3.6 3.7
( MN) Radke vs RH 393 114 24 18 36 .304 .333 .565 11.4 1.8 3.6
( MN) Smiley vs LH 192 50 0 16 34 .282 .340 .367 9.8 3.1 6.7
( MN) Smiley vs RH 759 201 18 51 134 .283 .332 .418 10.2 2.6 6.8
( MN) Stevens vs LH 125 33 9 14 18 .297 .370 .568 11.0 4.7 6.0
( MN) Stevens vs RH 143 29 5 15 27 .225 .309 .380 7.7 4.0 7.1
( MN) Trombley vs LH 248 64 9 17 35 .274 .319 .444 9.9 2.6 5.4
( MN) Trombley vs RH 254 48 7 25 47 .215 .306 .345 7.0 3.7 6.9
( MN) Watkins vs LH 2 1 0 0 0 .500 .500 .500 13.5 0.0 0.0
( MN) Watkins vs RH 3 1 0 0 0 .333 .333 .333 27.0 0.0 0.0
Minnesota vs LH 2865 788 91 247 379 .303 .364 .471 11.3 3.5 5.4
vs RH 3501 879 120 266 571 .274 .333 .445 9.7 2.9 6.3
New York Yankees
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( NY) Abbott,Ku vs LH .315 .573 .358 124 39 4 2 8 8 24 1 8.04
( NY) Abbott,Ku vs RH .247 .441 .305 320 79 14 3 14 25 93 4 4.80
( NY) Belcher vs LH .125 .188 .125 16 2 1 0 0 0 8 0 0.72
( NY) Belcher vs RH .000 .000 .000 20 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0.00
( NY) Buhner vs LH .234 .504 .313 141 33 8 0 10 18 41 4 5.17
( NY) Buhner vs RH .243 .579 .325 404 98 25 0 37 45 99 13 6.11
( NY) Darwin vs LH .333 .333 .500 3 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 8.51
( NY) Darwin vs RH .083 .083 .133 12 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.64
( NY) Frye vs LH .217 .283 .315 60 13 1 0 1 10 9 3 2.72
( NY) Frye vs RH .261 .372 .284 180 47 12 1 2 9 29 5 3.52
( NY) Gaetti vs LH .294 .595 .377 153 45 13 0 11 17 23 4 7.92
( NY) Gaetti vs RH .203 .357 .266 429 87 21 0 15 33 84 5 3.11
( NY) Gallagher vs LH .391 .435 .440 23 9 1 0 0 2 1 0 8.93
( NY) Gallagher vs RH .356 .402 .434 87 31 4 0 0 12 12 1 7.61
( NY) Garcia,F vs LH .100 .100 .250 10 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 1.14
( NY) Garcia,F vs RH .130 .174 .200 23 3 1 0 0 2 8 0 1.22
( NY) Gonzalez,J vs LH .276 .512 .313 123 34 6 1 7 7 29 4 5.06
( NY) Gonzalez,J vs RH .253 .536 .285 265 67 10 1 21 12 52 9 4.65
( NY) Jarvis vs LH .000 .000 .200 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0.35
( NY) Jarvis vs RH .143 .143 .143 7 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.64
( NY) Jefferson vs LH .240 .340 .268 50 12 5 0 0 2 11 1 3.11
( NY) Jefferson vs RH .242 .418 .289 91 22 7 0 3 5 17 1 4.25
( NY) Jeter vs LH .182 .182 .182 11 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 1.09
( NY) Jeter vs RH .194 .333 .216 36 7 1 2 0 1 9 0 2.47
( NY) Kelly,P vs LH .217 .283 .294 46 10 3 0 0 4 13 0 2.86
( NY) Kelly,P vs RH .191 .291 .268 110 21 5 0 2 11 28 0 2.75
( NY) Kelly,R vs LH .299 .382 .337 157 47 7 0 2 5 25 1 5.05
( NY) Kelly,R vs RH .227 .310 .248 255 58 15 0 2 7 35 5 2.52
( NY) Kingery vs LH .067 .100 .125 30 2 1 0 0 2 4 0 0.46
( NY) Kingery vs RH .199 .297 .270 266 53 9 4 3 25 30 3 2.83
( NY) Leyritz vs LH .316 .474 .423 114 36 6 0 4 15 30 3 8.00
( NY) Leyritz vs RH .205 .267 .314 146 30 6 0 1 18 44 1 3.13
( NY) Livingstone vs LH .231 .269 .286 26 6 1 0 0 2 8 0 2.90
( NY) Livingstone vs RH .347 .455 .392 176 61 10 0 3 12 17 3 7.14
( NY) Morgan vs LH .000 .000 .000 6 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.00
( NY) Morgan vs RH .036 .036 .069 28 1 0 0 0 1 12 0 0.09
( NY) Morris vs LH .286 .490 .352 49 14 5 1 1 5 4 1 5.99
( NY) Morris vs RH .300 .436 .347 307 92 27 0 5 24 56 8 5.24
( NY) Nen vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( NY) Nen vs RH .000 .000 .000 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( NY) Pettitte vs LH .000 .000 .000 11 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0.00
( NY) Pettitte vs RH .049 .049 .047 41 2 0 0 0 0 13 0 0.09
( NY) Reyes,C vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( NY) Reyes,C vs RH ---- ---- ---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( NY) Rivera vs LH .286 .286 .375 7 2 0 0 0 1 3 0 4.58
( NY) Rivera vs RH .059 .118 .059 17 1 1 0 0 0 7 0 0.20
( NY) Roberts vs LH .277 .325 .310 83 23 4 0 0 4 7 0 4.22
( NY) Roberts vs RH .290 .323 .327 186 54 6 0 0 9 21 1 4.20
( NY) Schourek vs LH .154 .154 .154 13 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.76
( NY) Schourek vs RH .220 .268 .239 41 9 2 0 0 2 13 1 2.13
( NY) Sojo vs LH .237 .237 .268 38 9 0 0 0 2 7 1 2.13
( NY) Sojo vs RH .195 .256 .252 133 26 6 1 0 9 18 1 2.12
( NY) Stanley vs LH .195 .373 .286 118 23 6 0 5 14 38 3 3.41
( NY) Stanley vs RH .208 .397 .283 317 66 12 0 16 31 93 12 3.44
( NY) Tavarez,Ju vs LH 1.000 2.000 1.000 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 INF
( NY) Tavarez,Ju vs RH .000 .000 .000 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( NY) Wickman vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( NY) Wickman vs RH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( NY) Williams,Ger vs LH .268 .339 .339 56 15 4 0 0 6 11 2 3.91
( NY) Williams,Ger vs RH .157 .315 .225 127 20 6 1 4 11 26 2 2.32
New York (AL) vs LH .258 .416 .322 1469 379 77 4 49 128 316 28 4.70
vs RH .232 .385 .288 4137 960 210 14 131 310 858 79 3.70
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( NY) Assenmacher vs LH 52 11 0 0 16 .220 .259 .320 7.1 0.0 10.3
( NY) Assenmacher vs RH 59 16 2 5 7 .314 .397 .510 12.3 3.9 5.4
( NY) Belcher vs LH 392 96 7 43 43 .274 .353 .390 9.9 4.4 4.4
( NY) Belcher vs RH 320 79 8 31 46 .269 .337 .388 9.7 3.8 5.6
( NY) Benes,Al vs LH 39 11 0 0 10 .282 .282 .359 10.2 0.0 9.3
( NY) Benes,Al vs RH 24 5 0 1 5 .217 .269 .261 7.1 1.4 7.1
( NY) Darwin vs LH 231 63 9 12 33 .286 .323 .464 10.6 2.0 5.6
( NY) Darwin vs RH 169 47 9 11 33 .299 .349 .497 11.3 2.7 8.0
( NY) Dewey vs LH 67 8 1 4 14 .125 .174 .188 3.9 2.0 6.9
( NY) Dewey vs RH 77 9 0 3 21 .122 .150 .189 3.7 1.2 8.7
( NY) Habyan vs LH 84 28 1 4 16 .350 .384 .550 14.3 2.0 8.2
( NY) Habyan vs RH 67 15 0 6 9 .254 .338 .356 8.3 3.3 5.0
( NY) Jarvis vs LH 172 57 7 13 16 .358 .408 .579 13.6 3.1 3.8
( NY) Jarvis vs RH 138 34 6 10 17 .266 .326 .445 9.7 2.8 4.8
( NY) Kamieniecki vs LH 102 25 0 11 5 .278 .363 .333 9.2 4.1 1.8
( NY) Kamieniecki vs RH 109 29 5 16 11 .322 .422 .567 12.2 6.8 4.6
( NY) Morgan vs LH 357 106 8 27 28 .321 .372 .482 11.8 3.0 3.1
( NY) Morgan vs RH 303 85 7 15 44 .293 .332 .434 10.5 1.8 5.4
( NY) Nen vs LH 102 28 4 9 25 .298 .356 .489 11.1 3.6 9.9
( NY) Nen vs RH 106 24 4 11 20 .255 .327 .489 8.6 4.0 7.2
( NY) Pettitte vs LH 191 45 4 19 26 .260 .330 .405 9.3 3.9 5.4
( NY) Pettitte vs RH 663 146 8 58 111 .242 .310 .350 8.3 3.3 6.3
( NY) Reyes,C vs LH 27 7 0 1 2 .269 .296 .385 9.0 1.3 2.6
( NY) Reyes,C vs RH 22 3 0 3 1 .167 .333 .167 5.4 5.4 1.8
( NY) Rivera vs LH 183 44 4 20 26 .273 .358 .429 9.6 4.4 5.7
( NY) Rivera vs RH 150 30 5 8 22 .214 .260 .350 7.2 1.9 5.3
( NY) Russell vs LH 72 30 4 6 7 .441 .474 .676 20.2 4.1 4.7
( NY) Russell vs RH 61 15 1 5 10 .268 .323 .393 9.0 3.0 6.0
( NY) Schourek vs LH 188 45 6 10 38 .253 .297 .404 8.7 1.9 7.3
( NY) Schourek vs RH 762 194 19 66 143 .280 .345 .446 10.1 3.4 7.4
( NY) Tavarez,Ju vs LH 137 32 2 11 16 .258 .321 .339 8.9 3.1 4.5
( NY) Tavarez,Ju vs RH 160 35 2 8 28 .230 .264 .349 7.4 1.7 5.9
( NY) Wickman vs LH 123 40 1 10 8 .342 .385 .470 12.6 3.1 2.5
( NY) Wickman vs RH 131 33 3 13 21 .275 .343 .408 10.1 4.0 6.4
New York (AL) vs LH 2596 691 61 205 345 .288 .345 .436 10.4 3.1 5.2
vs RH 3652 872 88 291 605 .261 .322 .406 9.1 3.1 6.3
Saint Louis Cardinals
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( ST) Alicea vs LH .234 .287 .336 94 22 3 1 0 15 21 6 3.10
( ST) Alicea vs RH .280 .367 .358 300 84 12 1 4 36 54 8 4.74
( ST) Alou vs LH .243 .439 .297 107 26 9 0 4 5 21 3 4.27
( ST) Alou vs RH .245 .458 .298 253 62 15 0 13 15 38 3 4.76
( ST) Battle vs LH .214 .214 .294 14 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 2.67
( ST) Battle vs RH .288 .327 .321 52 15 2 0 0 2 7 0 4.06
( ST) Brogna vs LH .225 .350 .271 80 18 4 0 2 5 19 2 3.05
( ST) Brogna vs RH .282 .501 .321 379 107 24 1 19 21 86 9 5.61
( ST) Cedeno,A vs LH .268 .411 .305 56 15 5 0 1 3 12 2 3.79
( ST) Cedeno,A vs RH .247 .354 .300 158 39 8 0 3 9 33 5 3.38
( ST) Finley,S vs LH .284 .372 .345 183 52 8 1 2 18 21 2 5.09
( ST) Finley,S vs RH .252 .319 .322 420 106 13 6 1 43 38 11 3.47
( ST) Gallego vs LH .397 .397 .479 63 25 0 0 0 9 14 1 8.42
( ST) Gallego vs RH .222 .222 .294 45 10 0 0 0 5 5 0 2.72
( ST) Hoiles vs LH .330 .708 .467 106 35 4 0 12 27 23 2 14.04
( ST) Hoiles vs RH .160 .243 .314 243 39 5 0 5 52 64 7 2.87
( ST) Jackson,D vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( ST) Jackson,D vs RH .333 .333 .250 6 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 3.42
( ST) Mabry vs LH .299 .343 .310 137 41 3 0 1 3 20 0 3.94
( ST) Mabry vs RH .285 .427 .329 309 88 26 0 6 19 32 5 5.18
( ST) Mondesi vs LH .321 .625 .352 184 59 12 4 12 8 39 2 8.70
( ST) Mondesi vs RH .275 .520 .311 483 133 20 7 28 23 80 7 5.81
( ST) Offerman vs LH .194 .258 .269 93 18 1 1 1 8 23 2 2.31
( ST) Offerman vs RH .239 .304 .306 276 66 12 3 0 28 52 3 3.37
( ST) Owens vs LH .259 .630 .355 27 7 1 0 3 1 10 0 8.64
( ST) Owens vs RH .314 .686 .351 35 11 4 0 3 1 14 0 9.69
( ST) Palmer vs LH .420 .800 .532 50 21 4 0 5 10 11 1 19.91
( ST) Palmer vs RH .253 .349 .404 83 21 5 0 1 16 18 0 5.53
( ST) Pena,G vs LH .375 .469 .410 32 12 3 0 0 4 7 0 6.09
( ST) Pena,G vs RH .250 .382 .333 76 19 5 1 1 10 24 1 4.63
( ST) Petkovsek vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( ST) Petkovsek vs RH .125 .125 .111 8 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.57
( ST) Reynolds vs LH .000 .000 .000 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0.00
( ST) Reynolds vs RH .000 .000 .059 13 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0.18
( ST) Sheaffer vs LH .094 .219 .171 32 3 1 0 1 3 5 2 0.77
( ST) Sheaffer vs RH .218 .363 .292 124 27 6 0 4 12 22 2 3.53
( ST) Sheffield vs LH .383 .717 .543 60 23 2 0 6 19 11 2 17.96
( ST) Sheffield vs RH .250 .384 .404 172 43 5 0 6 41 46 3 6.87
( ST) Smith,O vs LH .194 .194 .242 31 6 0 0 0 2 4 0 1.38
( ST) Smith,O vs RH .243 .330 .333 115 28 6 2 0 14 14 1 4.23
( ST) Sweeney vs LH .364 .455 .440 22 8 2 0 0 3 2 0 7.76
( ST) Sweeney vs RH .372 .488 .400 43 16 2 0 1 2 6 1 7.84
( ST) Tapani vs LH .600 .600 .500 5 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 15.84
( ST) Tapani vs RH .333 .556 .364 9 3 2 0 0 1 3 0 8.11
( ST) Watson vs LH 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 INF
( ST) Watson vs RH .200 .267 .250 15 3 1 0 0 1 6 0 2.40
( ST) Zeile vs LH .256 .267 .343 90 23 1 0 0 11 12 3 3.41
( ST) Zeile vs RH .240 .339 .297 283 68 13 0 5 18 55 9 3.37
St. Louis vs LH .283 .431 .353 1535 435 64 8 49 157 289 33 5.54
vs RH .254 .389 .321 4090 1040 198 23 102 372 736 79 4.40
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( ST) Barber vs LH 60 18 2 7 12 .340 .417 .509 12.5 4.8 8.3
( ST) Barber vs RH 75 15 1 11 16 .227 .329 .348 7.6 5.6 8.2
( ST) Brocail vs LH 154 47 3 5 14 .320 .353 .449 12.1 1.3 3.6
( ST) Brocail vs RH 185 51 7 11 19 .291 .333 .446 10.4 2.2 3.9
( ST) Christopher vs LH 88 32 3 10 14 .410 .477 .615 18.0 5.6 7.9
( ST) Christopher vs RH 94 21 6 2 10 .223 .235 .457 7.5 0.7 3.6
( ST) Clark,M vs LH 274 86 2 19 30 .335 .378 .416 13.0 2.9 4.5
( ST) Clark,M vs RH 320 90 16 16 37 .296 .336 .523 10.6 1.9 4.4
( ST) Daal vs LH 28 5 0 3 5 .208 .321 .292 7.5 4.5 7.5
( ST) Daal vs RH 33 15 0 3 2 .484 .514 .677 25.3 5.1 3.4
( ST) Eversgerd vs LH 19 5 0 0 3 .250 .238 .350 8.4 0.0 5.1
( ST) Eversgerd vs RH 58 16 1 6 2 .314 .397 .431 11.7 4.4 1.5
( ST) Fetters vs LH 93 24 2 16 22 .308 .417 .513 11.8 7.9 10.8
( ST) Fetters vs RH 110 31 4 9 22 .298 .345 .452 12.0 3.5 8.5
( ST) Frascatore vs LH 134 25 2 13 18 .208 .294 .308 7.0 3.7 5.1
( ST) Frascatore vs RH 88 25 2 6 13 .301 .348 .470 10.9 2.6 5.7
( ST) Grahe vs LH 89 24 2 5 3 .289 .337 .422 10.3 2.1 1.3
( ST) Grahe vs RH 62 14 4 4 7 .241 .290 .517 8.2 2.3 4.1
( ST) Jackson,D vs LH 92 21 1 15 4 .266 .378 .392 9.8 7.0 1.9
( ST) Jackson,D vs RH 359 103 6 45 37 .325 .404 .498 12.0 5.3 4.3
( ST) Perez,Mi vs LH 153 44 4 8 28 .303 .342 .428 11.8 2.1 7.5
( ST) Perez,Mi vs RH 192 53 4 17 33 .305 .368 .489 11.6 3.7 7.2
( ST) Petkovsek vs LH 268 73 9 21 22 .294 .348 .484 10.7 3.1 3.2
( ST) Petkovsek vs RH 235 67 10 9 31 .296 .324 .522 10.9 1.5 5.0
( ST) Reynolds vs LH 444 118 10 18 91 .274 .298 .401 9.7 1.5 7.5
( ST) Reynolds vs RH 464 103 9 17 117 .228 .254 .359 7.7 1.3 8.8
( ST) Ruffin,B vs LH 45 8 1 4 6 .195 .267 .341 5.7 2.8 4.3
( ST) Ruffin,B vs RH 95 21 0 14 12 .259 .365 .383 8.7 5.8 5.0
( ST) Suppan vs LH 58 24 4 0 16 .407 .400 .661 17.5 0.0 11.7
( ST) Suppan vs RH 79 21 6 3 14 .266 .287 .544 10.5 1.5 7.0
( ST) Tapani vs LH 408 133 18 18 53 .338 .364 .571 13.4 1.8 5.4
( ST) Tapani vs RH 427 112 22 16 85 .273 .302 .487 10.0 1.4 7.6
( ST) Watson vs LH 110 14 0 11 10 .144 .245 .186 4.7 3.7 3.3
( ST) Watson vs RH 532 142 17 42 64 .293 .357 .450 10.3 3.0 4.6
( ST) Worrell,Tim vs LH 39 9 1 2 11 .237 .268 .342 7.6 1.7 9.3
( ST) Worrell,Tim vs RH 36 7 0 2 6 .206 .263 .265 7.6 2.2 6.5
St. Louis vs LH 2620 723 65 191 373 .296 .347 .446 11.0 2.9 5.7
vs RH 3594 936 122 245 555 .278 .328 .456 9.9 2.6 5.9
Toronto Blue Jays
Team Name AVG SLG OBP AB H 2B 3B HR BB SO DP RC27
( TO) Abbott,J vs LH .000 .000 .000 6 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0.00
( TO) Abbott,J vs RH .211 .211 .190 19 4 0 0 0 0 7 0 1.52
( TO) Bell,De vs LH .341 .533 .382 135 46 8 0 6 8 20 2 7.73
( TO) Bell,De vs RH .288 .377 .348 379 109 23 1 3 24 55 4 4.96
( TO) Berroa vs LH .256 .440 .358 125 32 2 0 7 22 24 3 5.53
( TO) Berroa vs RH .279 .433 .326 337 94 15 2 11 27 53 10 4.89
( TO) Candiotti vs LH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( TO) Candiotti vs RH .111 .111 .190 18 2 0 0 0 2 4 0 0.92
( TO) Carter vs LH .262 .455 .291 145 38 4 0 8 5 19 2 4.83
( TO) Carter vs RH .239 .412 .272 347 83 12 0 16 14 66 9 3.64
( TO) Cedeno,D vs LH .240 .400 .296 75 18 0 0 4 4 18 2 4.05
( TO) Cedeno,D vs RH .239 .354 .289 113 27 7 0 2 8 25 0 3.52
( TO) Davis,C vs LH .327 .519 .424 104 34 2 0 6 19 21 3 8.97
( TO) Davis,C vs RH .316 .489 .394 307 97 17 0 12 42 65 10 7.16
( TO) Delgado vs LH .000 .000 .000 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( TO) Delgado vs RH .167 .200 .200 60 10 2 0 0 3 18 0 1.44
( TO) Fryman vs LH .312 .422 .359 154 48 7 2 2 11 27 7 5.03
( TO) Fryman vs RH .290 .421 .357 480 139 20 2 13 49 84 18 5.15
( TO) Gomez,C vs LH .257 .357 .342 70 18 4 0 1 8 12 2 4.33
( TO) Gomez,C vs RH .170 .300 .243 253 43 11 2 6 22 71 3 2.50
( TO) Gonzalez,A vs LH .184 .250 .267 76 14 3 1 0 10 28 2 2.30
( TO) Gonzalez,A vs RH .187 .313 .269 182 34 9 1 4 23 66 2 2.90
( TO) Green,S vs LH .224 .328 .264 67 15 4 0 1 2 21 0 3.01
( TO) Green,S vs RH .291 .483 .329 375 109 32 2 12 17 47 2 6.04
( TO) Hernandez,J vs LH .184 .211 .225 38 7 1 0 0 2 14 0 1.72
( TO) Hernandez,J vs RH .273 .584 .289 231 63 9 3 19 9 68 4 5.81
( TO) Hulse vs LH .097 .097 .097 31 3 0 0 0 0 13 0 0.38
( TO) Hulse vs RH .277 .396 .311 101 28 2 2 2 4 17 1 5.01
( TO) Kmak vs LH .118 .118 .111 17 2 0 0 0 0 6 4 -----
( TO) Kmak vs RH .130 .152 .231 46 6 1 0 0 5 8 5 0.69
( TO) Leiter,A vs LH .200 .200 .167 5 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1.37
( TO) Leiter,A vs RH .150 .150 .192 20 3 0 0 0 1 8 2 0.76
( TO) Martinez,S vs LH .159 .227 .178 44 7 3 0 0 0 18 0 1.33
( TO) Martinez,S vs RH .283 .398 .313 191 54 19 0 1 7 54 0 4.72
( TO) Myers,G vs LH .216 .341 .242 88 19 3 1 2 2 16 0 2.91
( TO) Myers,G vs RH .300 .502 .338 213 64 8 1 11 13 38 2 6.37
( TO) Olerud vs LH .184 .228 .282 136 25 6 0 0 16 21 4 2.10
( TO) Olerud vs RH .311 .428 .402 456 142 35 0 6 67 52 15 6.46
( TO) Perez,R vs LH .333 .333 .333 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.50
( TO) Perez,R vs RH .176 .176 .222 17 3 0 0 0 1 0 2 0.61
( TO) Perez,T vs LH .600 .600 .600 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 4.05
( TO) Perez,T vs RH .215 .241 .262 79 17 2 0 0 5 11 5 1.57
( TO) Rekar vs LH .286 .286 .286 7 2 0 0 0 0 4 0 3.09
( TO) Rekar vs RH .000 .000 .000 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
( TO) Stewart,S vs LH .000 .000 .000 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
( TO) Stewart,S vs RH .000 .000 .000 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0.00
Toronto vs LH .249 .373 .308 1338 333 47 4 37 109 289 32 3.93
vs RH .265 .408 .322 4295 1140 225 16 119 350 843 94 4.62
Team Name BF H HR BB SO OAVG OOBP OSLG H/9 BB/9 K/9
( TO) Abbott,J vs LH 178 49 4 18 20 .304 .370 .472 11.2 4.1 4.6
( TO) Abbott,J vs RH 842 238 23 64 102 .307 .359 .474 11.2 3.0 4.8
( TO) Candiotti vs LH 544 130 13 47 93 .264 .330 .396 9.5 3.4 6.8
( TO) Candiotti vs RH 483 101 13 32 95 .226 .280 .357 7.5 2.4 7.1
( TO) Carrara vs LH 14 5 2 1 1 .385 .429 .923 19.3 3.9 3.9
( TO) Carrara vs RH 8 1 0 1 1 .143 .250 .286 4.5 4.5 4.5
( TO) Castillo,T vs LH 71 13 1 5 8 .194 .243 .328 5.9 2.3 3.7
( TO) Castillo,T vs RH 213 59 8 16 27 .307 .363 .521 11.4 3.1 5.2
( TO) Crabtree vs LH 67 11 0 11 6 .204 .348 .278 6.6 6.6 3.6
( TO) Crabtree vs RH 97 20 0 15 13 .256 .392 .372 9.0 6.8 5.8
( TO) Doherty vs LH 63 22 1 2 4 .373 .413 .525 16.1 1.5 2.9
( TO) Doherty vs RH 69 24 0 2 10 .353 .366 .412 13.2 1.1 5.5
( TO) Hall vs LH 23 5 1 1 4 .227 .261 .500 8.4 1.7 6.8
( TO) Hall vs RH 33 5 0 2 8 .161 .212 .226 5.2 2.1 8.3
( TO) Hancock vs LH 14 3 0 1 0 .214 .250 .286 6.8 2.2 0.0
( TO) Hancock vs RH 39 7 0 2 4 .194 .237 .278 6.5 1.9 3.7
( TO) Henke vs LH 107 13 0 9 25 .133 .202 .204 4.1 2.8 7.8
( TO) Henke vs RH 125 20 0 10 27 .183 .258 .248 5.6 2.8 7.6
( TO) Hentgen vs LH 468 120 13 46 66 .284 .356 .438 10.7 4.1 5.9
( TO) Hentgen vs RH 462 123 16 40 78 .296 .363 .464 10.9 3.5 6.9
( TO) Hudson vs LH 114 33 0 12 10 .327 .398 .406 12.5 4.6 3.8
( TO) Hudson vs RH 133 39 0 8 21 .315 .362 .460 11.6 2.4 6.2
( TO) Hurtado vs LH 29 6 0 2 3 .222 .276 .222 7.4 2.5 3.7
( TO) Hurtado vs RH 18 2 0 2 4 .125 .222 .125 3.2 3.2 6.4
( TO) Key vs LH 16 7 1 0 0 .438 .438 .688 23.6 0.0 0.0
( TO) Key vs RH 83 32 7 3 9 .386 .393 .711 16.0 1.5 4.5
( TO) Leiter,A vs LH 165 35 2 23 35 .246 .349 .366 8.7 5.7 8.7
( TO) Leiter,A vs RH 842 174 17 107 164 .238 .336 .367 8.0 4.9 7.5
( TO) Menhart vs LH 173 52 8 22 19 .351 .446 .615 14.6 6.2 5.3
( TO) Menhart vs RH 139 26 6 15 20 .210 .296 .387 6.8 3.9 5.2
( TO) Rekar vs LH 161 54 8 9 15 .355 .387 .566 14.7 2.5 4.1
( TO) Rekar vs RH 148 41 7 7 22 .304 .361 .548 11.5 2.0 6.2
( TO) Robinson vs LH 41 11 1 8 8 .333 .463 .485 13.5 9.8 9.8
( TO) Robinson vs RH 46 9 2 4 12 .214 .292 .381 6.4 2.8 8.5
( TO) Timlin vs LH 115 30 0 9 18 .294 .365 .422 10.8 3.2 6.5
( TO) Timlin vs RH 123 21 1 8 26 .188 .256 .268 6.2 2.3 7.6
( TO) Ware vs LH 43 10 2 8 6 .294 .442 .559 11.2 9.0 6.8
( TO) Ware vs RH 51 9 1 2 8 .180 .218 .280 5.8 1.3 5.1
Toronto vs LH 2406 609 57 234 341 .282 .354 .434 10.4 4.0 5.8
vs RH 3954 951 101 340 651 .266 .333 .417 9.3 3.3 6.3
Use your browser to go back to the MBL Home Page.
