If you are interested, I have posted responses to all of the people who have found the time to send me hate mail below. You may send them mail if you wish (and if they have provided their e-mail address), but please do not be nasty. I would prefer it if we did not lower ourselves to their level.
Don't let my responses discourage you from sending me critical comments or your own opinions, but be aware that any slanderous or generally hateful mail will be responded to here, whether or not you provide a valid return e-mail address.
God - 01/20/98 22:22:07 (invalid return e-mail address)
DO NOT EVER, EVER say forget Hitler. It is a sad, sad chapter in the history of the world that cannot, and should not be forgotten. Also, your essay/debate topics seem over-inflated... your essays and debates hardly live up to their description. They are also to short, and contain no proof whatsoever to back them up with fact or reference. God is angry. Get your ego and intellect checked so that you don't make your work sound better than it is.
Normally, I would not afford a response to someone
who posts hate mail and claims to be God, but here it is:
If you had taken the time to read my speech in its entirety, you would know
that I did not write "forget Hitler," or anything of the kind. If you
had quoted the statement in context (from the speech
"On the Issue of Cloning") you would know
that I wrote that when we "begin to realise the advantages of cloning and
forget about rumours of megalomaniacs and the return of Hitler, we will see
the benefits of cloning." I did not write that we should "forget
Hitler," but that we should forget about rumours of his return, which the
facts clearly indicate is not possible. Hitler should not be forgotten,
and I sincerely apologize if anything that I have written suggests anything
to the contrary (which it does not). Rather, Hitler should serve as
a reminder of the evils of fascism, nazism, and collectivism in
general.
As for my essays and debates, perhaps you should read them more carefully. Unlike your assertion that my essays "contain no proof whatsoever to back them up with fact or reference," my essays are always backed up with facts. Perhaps you did not notice the 38 endnotes at the end of a recent essay on Canada's Immigration System. Why would I need these if I did not use facts or references to back up my arguments? Granted, some of the material on The Right Ideology is based on philosophical topics and does not contain many facts or any references, but in these cases, none are necessary. Can I prove that every person has the natural right to life, liberty, and property with facts? No, I cannot. Nevertheless, this is true.
And as for the quality of my work, I believe that the real God would be a much better judge than someone as ignorant and sacreligious as you.