The activities of the Belgrade-MACHO project during its first two years of work are reviewed. The theoretical work on the microlensing optical depths and their connection with the problem of the baryonic dark matter, the shape of the disk and halo of the Milky Way, already yielded significant results. The emphasis is put on the intense use of today's common software and Internet resources. International collaborations and future plans are also briefly considered. 

Microlensing and Galactic Dynamics

Vigorous astrophysical research addresses these problems. As an illustration, we point out that the bibliography of Samurovic, Cirkovic & Milosevic-Zdjelar (1999, SCMZ) amounts to 119 refereed research papers and 16 review articles. Entire NASA ADS microlensing bibliography (http://adswww.harvard.edu), represented in the Fig. 1 for the last quarter of a century, searched by key words, has 794 units. Almost exponential growth with time (with best fit time constant $\tau \sim 5$ years) is faster than in almost any other field of contemporary research, not only within astronomical disciplines.

ML events caused by MACHOs serve various astrophysical purposes: constraining mass distribution in the Galaxy and present-day stellar mass function (see Gould 1996). With this in mind, the investigation of global consequences of statistics of ML events along various lines of sight on the Galactic structure and dynamics, other galaxies and universe as a whole, had started at the beginning of 1998, within the framework of the Belgrade-MACHO Project. Hereby we would like to summarize some of the most significant results. Finally, we point out further directions of Belgrade-MACHO project and our collaborations within the world network of gravitational lensing research. 

Figure 1. The temporal distribution of the scientific publications on microlensing and related topics in the last quarter of a century.

Figure 2. Predicted ML optical depth towards sources located at D=50 kpc in a model with moderate halo flattening q=0.6

MACHOs and Baryonic Dark Matter

1. All significant ML results are still within $\simeq 50$ kpc: Galactic bulge (surveys by MACHO http://wwwmacho.mcmaster.ca and ML Alerts http://darkstar.astro.washington.edu, DUO and OGLE http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~ogle (Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment) collaborations) or Magellanic Clouds (MACHO and EROS http://www.lal.in2p3.fr/recherche/eros (Experience pour la Recherche d'Objets Sombres) collaborations). This is a fundamental constraint, until results towards more distant sources, like M31, are obtained. It may be expected soon, since MEGA and AGAPE http://cdfinfo.in2p3.fr/Experiences/AGAPE (Andromeda Galaxy and Amplified Pixels Exp.) coll. already started a survey (Gyuk 1999 

private communication). 
2. Statistics are still insufficient to determine optical depths in given directions with uncertainties smaller than $\delta \tau /\tau =0.5$. 

One of the major conclusions of ScMZ is that nearly spherical haloes contain too much baryonic matter in the form of MACHOs. Although not in direct conflict with the BBNS constraints, it is uncomfortable, since other components of baryonic matter (intergalactic medium manifested through the Ly$\alpha$ forest), also pretend to be dominant in the total budget. This situation, and related value of Hubble constant, are shown in the Fig. 3. Proposal of Milosevic-Zdjelar, Samurovic & Cirkovic (1999), removes the inconsistency by taking into account moderate flattening of Milky Way's halo, see Fig. 4, and agrees with recent CMBR studies (Lineweaver et al. 1997), BBNS and light element abundances constraints (Burles et al. 1999), and IGM studies (Burles & Tytler 1998). 

Figure 4. Dependence of ${\Omega_B}$ on h for moderate halo flattening 
q=0.6 (from Milosevic-Zdjelar, Samurovic & Cirkovic 1999).

Further investigations are necessary, especially of MACHO formation epoch, probed by early damped Ly$\alpha$ and similar gas-rich systems. This, coupled with ML advances, should be
able to solve the problem of baryonic component of DM and unify several branches of astrophysical research into a coherent picture of the evolution of baryonic matter in the universe (Cirkovic, Samurovic & Milosevic-Zdjelar 1999). 

MACHOs and the Shape of the Milky Way

Figure 5: Dependence of the MACHO halo mass (in units of $10^{11}\; M_\odot$) for three choices of flattening parameter q as a function of halo core radius (ScMZ). Square points represent spherical (q=1), circles extremely flattened (q=0.2), and crosses the intermediate case (q=0.6). Moderate halo flattening agrees with the most recent estimate of the total mass of the halo within 50 kpc, by Wilkinson & Evans (1999) on $\sim 5.4^{+0.2}_{-3.6}\times 10^{11} M{}_\odot$.}

Various software packages were used in order to obtain results. Most of the work was done using a free version of Unix operating system, Linux. Software ranges from free GNU codes (compilers, editors, utilities) to commercial large mathematical packages (Mathematica and Maple).
Unfortunately, no application can perform all: complete calculation, production of plots and detailed analysis. 

Plans for the Future

(1) Construction of models incorporating both gaseous and MACHO haloes, strongly constrained by ML observational data. In order to built a total set of constraints in which the realistic model of the composition of the baryonic matter in the universe should be built, we should consider BBNS which entered the epoch of very high precision, Gunn-Peterson optical depths for both HI and HeII (e.g. Jakobsen 1998), vast statistics of the Ly$\alpha$ forest lines, observations of low-redshift absorption in well-defined galactic haloes (e.g. Chen et al. 1998) and improved X-ray data on the
hot gas distribution in both clusters and small groups of galaxies. Models should also be able to account for known large-scale phenomena, particularly the Magellanic Stream, which shows presence of Galactic gaseous halo up to of $\sim 50$ kpc (Weiner & Williams 1996) . Within reach of current knowledge, the development of such models is clearly defined task of near future. 

(2) Inclusion of MACHO formation in cooling flows would present a powerful theoretical basis for analysis of universality and evolution of the BDM (e.g. Nulsen & Fabian 1997). Detailed understanding of these processes is still lacking. 

(3) The detailed probing of the Galactic potential remains the main effort of Belgrade-MACHO project. Apart from lines of sight towards M31 (for which we are insured from AGAPE and MEGA coll. to have data in less than two years) and several globular clusters, lines of sight towards 
distant pulsars may also be of interest in this respect, due to Shapiro Phase Shift (changes in their stable beat by any object crossing along the line-of-sight), e.g. Fargion & Conversano (1998). Monitoring pulsars could, therefore, presents a tool for discovering dark objects, even planets as close as within Solar System. 

(4) Lensing of stars by spherical gas clouds (Henriksen & Widrow 1995, Draine 1998) could explain the extreme scattering effects (ESEs) (Fiedler et al. 1985) manifested as a class of variations at GHz frequences. Extragalactic point radio sources can be amplified and deamplified when the lens crosses the line of sight. Walker & Wardle (1998) suggested that this can be due to a halo
population of $\sim 10^{14}$ molecular gas clouds that have mass $\approx 10^{-3}M_\odot$ and radius $R\approx 3$ AU (Shchekinov 1998).

Belgrade-MACHO project relies on the data of large observational ML network maintaining constant contact with EROS, AGAPE, MEGA and PLANET teams. 
In order to provide the information concerning the latest research we created the home page: 
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/7102/Belgrade-MACHO.html.

The authors express gratitude to all those people and organizations who in any way helped their work. Special thanks go to Drs. Penny Sackett, Geza Gyuk, Reza Ansari and Slobodan Ninkovic, who frequently offered inspiration, encouragement and advice. SS acknowledges the financial support of the University of Trieste and the hospitality of the people at the Trieste Department of Astronomy and the Observatory.

• Alcock, C. et al., 1996, ApJ, 461, 84
• Alcock, C. et al., 1997, ApJ, 479, 119
• Ansari, R. et al., 1996, A & A, 314, 94 
• Bienayme, O.: 1999, A& A, 341, 86
• Burles, S., Nollett, K.M., Truran, J.N. & Turner, M.S.: 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett. submitted, preprint astro-ph/9901157
• Burles, S. & Tytler, D. 1998, ApJ, 499, 699
• Chen, H.-W., Lanzetta, K. M., Webb, J. K., & Barcons, X. 1998, ApJ, 498, 77 
• Cirkovic, M., Samurovic, S. & Milosevic-Zdjelar, V. 1999, to be published in "Gravitational Lensing: Recent Progress and Future Goals", eds: T. Brainerd and C. Kochanek, ASP Conf. Series, preprint astro-ph/9909238
• Draine, B.T.: 1998, ApJ, 509, L41
• Fargion, D. & Conversano, R. 1998, preprint astro-ph/9812463 
• Fiedler, R.L., Dennison, B., Johnston, K.J. & Hewish, A.:

1987, Nature, 326, 675
• Fields, B. D., Freese, K., & Graff, D. S. 1998, NewA, 3, 347
• Gates, E. I., Gyuk, G., & Turner, M. S. 1995, Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 3724
• Gould, A. 1996, PASP, 108, 465
• Henriksen, R.N. & Widrow, L.M.: 1995, ApJ, 441, 70
• Jakobsen, P. 1998, A & A, 331, 61 
• Lineweaver, C. H., Barbosa, D., Blanchard, A., & Bartlett, J. G. 1997, A& A, 322, 365
• Milosevic-Zdjelar, V., Samurovic, S. & Cirkovic, M. 1999, to be published in "Gravitational Lensing: Recent Progress and Future Goals", eds: T. Brainerd and C. Kochanek, ASP Conf. Series, preprint astro-ph/9909240
• Nulsen, P. E. J., & Fabian, A. C. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 425 
• Paczynski B., 1986, ApJ, 304, 1
• Pfenniger, D., Combes, F. & Martinet, L. 1994, A & A, 285, 79
• Sackett, P. D., & Gould, A. 1993, ApJ, 419, 648
• Samurovic, S., Milosevic-Zdjelar, V., Cirkovic, M. M., & Celebonovic, V. 1998, contributed paper to the 4th Yugoslav-Romanian Astronomical Meeting, Publ. Astron. Obs. Belgrade, No. 60, p. 74
• Samurovic, S., Cirkovic, M. M. & Milosevic-Zdjelar, V. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 63, preprint astro-ph/9907165 (SCMZ)
• Shchekinov, Yu. A.: 1998, Astron. Rept. in press, preprint astro-ph/9811434
• Walker, M. & Wardle, M.: 1998, ApJ, 498, L125
• Weiner, B. J., & Williams, T. B. 1996, AJ, 111, 1156
• Wilkinson, M.I. & Evans, N.W.: 1999, MNRAS, in press, preprint astro-ph/9906197

Figure 6. Vesna Milosevic-Zdjelar with Penny Sackett at the conference 
"Gravitational Lensing: Recent Progress and Future Goals",
George Sherman Union Building, Boston University, July 1999.

Figure 7. Vesna Milosevic-Zdjelar with Paul Schechter at the same Conference.