| Reproducible Electronic Publishing can defeat censorship.
From Bill Restemeyer and the Internet Infidels for The Freethought Web. |
|
Did Jesus Christ Really Live? |
by Marshall J. Gauvin |
Page 16
| The Christ of the Gospels is shown to be artificial by
the numerous contradictions in his character and teachings. He was in favor of the sword,
and he was not.
If Christ, with all that is miraculous and impossible in his nature, could not have been invented, what shall we say of Othello, of Hamlet, of Romeo? Do not Shakespeare's wondrous characters live upon the stage?
Yes, the character of Christ could have been invented! But how account for Christianity if Christ did not live?
The Jesus Christ of the Gospels could not possibly have been a real person. He is a combination of impossible elements. |
"But," says the Christian,
"Christ is so perfect a character that he could not have been invented." This is
a mistake. The Gospels do not portray a perfect character. The Christ of the Gospels is
shown to be artificial by the numerous contradictions in his character and teachings. He
was in favor of the sword, and he was not; he told men to love their enemies, and advised
them to hate their friends; he preached the doctrine of forgiveness, and called men a
generation of vipers; he announced himself as the judge of the world, and declared that he
would judge no man; he taught that he was possessed of all power, but was unable to work
miracles where the people did not believe; he was represented as God and did not shrink
from avowing, "I and my Father are one," but in the pain and gloom of the cross,
he is made to cry out in his anguish: "My God, my God, why hast Thou forsaken
me?" And how singular it is that these words, reputed as the dying utterance of the
disillusioned Christ, should be not only contradicted by two Evangelists, but should be a
quotation from the twenty-second Psalm! If there is a moment when a man's speech is original, it is when, amid agony and despair, while his heart is breaking beneath its burden of defeat and disappointment, he utters a cry of grief from the depth of his wounded soul with the last breath that remains before the chill waves of death engulf his wasted life forever. But on the lips of the expiring Christ are placed, not the heart-felt words of a dying man, but a quotation from the literature of his race! A being with these contradictions, these transparent unrealities in his character, could scarcely have been real. And if Christ, with all that is miraculous and impossible in his nature, could not have been invented, what shall we say of Othello, of Hamlet, of Romeo? Do not Shakespeare's wondrous characters live upon the stage? Does not their naturalness, their consistency, their human grandeur, challenge our admiration? And is it not with difficulty that we believe them to be children of the imagination? Laying aside the miraculous, in the story of the Jewish hero, is not the character of Jean Valjean as deep, as lofty, as broad, as rich in its humanity, as tender in its pathos, as sublime in its heroism, and as touchingly resigned to the cruelties of fate as the character of Jesus? Who has read the story of that marvelous man without being thrilled? And who has followed him through his last days with dry eyes? And yet Jean Valjean never lived and never died; he was not a real man, but the personification of suffering virtue born in the effulgent brain of Victor Hugo. Have you not wept when you have seen Sydney Carton disguise himself and lay his neck beneath the blood-stained knife of the guillotine, to save the life of Evremonde? But Sydney Carton was not an actual human being; he is the heroic, self-sacrificing spirit of humanity clothed in human form by the genius of Charles Dickens. Yes, the character of Christ could have been invented! The literature of the world is filled with invented characters; and the imaginary lives of the splendid men and women of fiction will forever arrest the interest of the mind and hold the heart enthralled. But how account for Christianity if Christ did not live? Let me ask another question. How account for the Renaissance, for the Reformation, for the French Revolution, or for Socialism? Not one of these movements was created by an individual. They grew. Christianity grew. The Christian church is older than the oldest Christian writings. Christ did not produce the church. The church produced the story of Christ. The Jesus Christ of the Gospels could not possibly have been a real person. He is a combination of impossible elements. There may have lived in Palestine, nineteen centuries ago, a man whose name was Jesus, who went about doing good, who was followed by admiring associates, and who in the end met a violent death. But of this possible person, not a line was written when he lived, and of his life and character the world of to-day knows absolutely nothing. This Jesus, if he lived, was a man; and if he was a reformer, he was but one of many that have lived and died in every age of the world. When the world shall have learned that the Christ of the Gospels is a myth, that Christianity is untrue, it will turn its attention from the religious fictions of the past to the vital problems of to-day, and endeavor to solve them for the improvement of the well-being of the real men and women whom we know, and whom we ought to help and love. These files, and many more are available at the Secular Web: http://www.infidels.org/. For more information send mail to [email protected]
|