Invasion of the Masons
Mason lore is the cornerstone on which this newsgroup was BUILT.   And it all started with a little crossposting, courtesy of Tom Brown...


Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] ()
Date:         1997/01/19
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members
[More Headers]

>In article <[email protected]>,
>   [email protected] (Thomas G. Hunter) wrote:
>
>>Do you really think that alt.masonic.members is the proper place for
>>these tirades? I certainly don't.  Apparently Gresham's Law applies to
>>newsgroups as well as economics.

Hey, I've got this thing called the Boumi Temple just around the corner.
Seems mostly populated by prehistoric geezers driving cadillacs. I'm
amazed any of you guys even have computers, much less net access.

What's up with your wacky shit anyway? I always thought it was a
drinking club for old farts with nothing better to do, but here
y'all are on the net....



ubject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] (Michael Stiler)
Date:         1997/01/21
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members
[More Headers]

[email protected] () writes:

>>In article <[email protected]>,
>>   [email protected] (Thomas G. Hunter) wrote:
>>
>>>Do you really think that alt.masonic.members is the proper place for
>>>these tirades? I certainly don't.  Apparently Gresham's Law applies to
>>>newsgroups as well as economics.

>Hey, I've got this thing called the Boumi Temple just around the corner.
>Seems mostly populated by prehistoric geezers driving cadillacs. I'm
>amazed any of you guys even have computers, much less net access.

>What's up with your wacky shit anyway? I always thought it was a
>drinking club for old farts with nothing better to do, but here
>y'all are on the net....
 

Hello Tom Brown -

Is the Boumi Temple a "Masonic" Temple?  If it is then it relates to us.
If not, then you've got the wrong group.  As for being amazed that
'old geezers' would have computers?  Hell buddy, most of us were around
when (and even BEFORE) they INVENTED computers; we've programmed on paper
tape or punch cards or punched switches (binary coding), etc.  Have you
even *seen* an 8-inch floppy disk, or worked on a computer that had, at
the most, 16K (that's 'K', not 'M') of ram?  Computers are kind of like
sex with your old girlfriend.  Don't think that just because _you've_
just gotten into computers that someone else didn't get there first.  <grin>

Ah, a 'drinking club for old farts'...  That's a good one, but shows that
you haven't done your homework before demonstrating your mental agility
to the millions of people world wide potentionally reading your posting.
Not a good introduction, I'm afraid...

Because in reality I'm a very nice person, I'll send you a very short
email on what a Mason is.  You can peruse it at your convenience and then,
if you want to, you can come back here and say 'Hi' to us.  Ok?

'Course, if your original post was supposed to be funny, then let us know
and learn to use 'smileys' or <grin> to let us know when you're joking;
we always appreciate good humor - course it make our arthritic old bones
ache from laughing!
 

Mike



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] (Palace of Jackals)
Date:         1997/01/21
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

On 21 Jan 1997 03:59:53 GMT, [email protected] (Michael Stiler)
wrote:

|>[email protected] () writes:
|>
|>>>In article <[email protected]>,
|>>>   [email protected] (Thomas G. Hunter) wrote:
|>>>
|>>>>Do you really think that alt.masonic.members is the proper place for
|>>>>these tirades? I certainly don't.  Apparently Gresham's Law applies to
|>>>>newsgroups as well as economics.
|>
|>>Hey, I've got this thing called the Boumi Temple just around the corner.
|>>Seems mostly populated by prehistoric geezers driving cadillacs. I'm
|>>amazed any of you guys even have computers, much less net access.
|>
|>>What's up with your wacky shit anyway? I always thought it was a
|>>drinking club for old farts with nothing better to do, but here
|>>y'all are on the net....
|>
|>
|>Hello Tom Brown -
|>
|>Is the Boumi Temple a "Masonic" Temple?  If it is then it relates to us.
|>If not, then you've got the wrong group.

Herr Stiler,
let me shut your pomposity down right here.  *You* have crossposted to
*US*, a fine and happy haven of free-thinkers and  proponents of the
"we don't care what the hell you post"   and we don't eat babies or
hate the Black Man.
well, I don't know for sure about the baby part.

Stiler, you genius, learn how to edit newsgroups and then shove your
Ouija board right up your tight ass.   You are on alt.fan.gene-scott,
I am on alt.fan.gene-scott.....and I don't know nothing 'bout no
chumpy ass old dumbfuck men and their secret handshakes....
I do know you dissed Tom, a member of fine standing around here only
replying to what was in this group, not YOUR group....and at that I
growl at you sir, Grrrrrrrr, yes Growl!!!!  GRRRRRRRRR...

But to show that I have no hard feelings, I have also crossposted this
to alt.conspiracy.retards.

Sister Rosa


Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] (Michael Stiler)
Date:         1997/01/21
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

[email protected] (Palace of Jackals) writes:
>On 21 Jan 1997 03:59:53 GMT, [email protected] (Michael Stiler)
>wrote:
>|>[email protected] () writes:
>|>>>In article <[email protected]>,
>|>>>   [email protected] (Thomas G. Hunter) wrote:
.
.  snipped
.
>|>Hello Tom Brown -
>|>
>|>Is the Boumi Temple a "Masonic" Temple?  If it is then it relates to us.
>|>If not, then you've got the wrong group.

>Herr Stiler,
>let me shut your pomposity down right here.  *You* have crossposted to
>*US*, a fine and happy haven of free-thinkers and  proponents of the
>"we don't care what the hell you post"   and we don't eat babies or
>hate the Black Man.
>well, I don't know for sure about the baby part.
 

Actually, Sister Rosa, if you had checked Tom Brown's _ORIGINAL_ post,
you'd have seen that it was *HE* that posted into the Freemasonry
newsgroups.  I, not knowing where he posted from, responded back to him
by leaving his newsgroups list intact.

I'm happy to know that your group, along with ours (and of course, most
of the civilized world) don't eat babies or hate black people.  I'm at
least _very_sure_ about the baby part, while you seem to have some
hesitation; perhaps you need to study more about the Masonic Fraternity?
 
 

>Stiler, you genius, learn how to edit newsgroups and then shove your
>Ouija board right up your tight ass.   You are on alt.fan.gene-scott,
>I am on alt.fan.gene-scott.....and I don't know nothing 'bout no
>chumpy ass old dumbfuck men and their secret handshakes....
>I do know you dissed Tom, a member of fine standing around here only
>replying to what was in this group, not YOUR group....and at that I
>growl at you sir, Grrrrrrrr, yes Growl!!!!  GRRRRRRRRR...
 

Well, no foolin', Sister Rosa?  Alt.fan.gene-scott?  Wow.  I'm impressed.
If you'd _happen_ to pay attention before you wrote something, you'd
have known that I happen to watch Dr. Scott when he's on tv - I actually
enjoy him.  So perhaps let's agree that you're wrong on this.  Now if
you'd only learn something about Masonry, then we could have a rational
discussion.  Your 'growling' is understood as your in-attentive-ness to
follow a discussion from it's beginning; and like my pet dog at home
I understand the lack of higher intelligence demonstrated by you.
I haven't figured out where the Ouija board comes into the conversation
though <grin>.  As for 'chumpy ass old dumb**** men', you obviously
haven't been seeing the new blood coming into the Masonic Lodges -
bright, educated young men (they start at 21 years of age and go up from
there.  The secret handshake part you've *almost* got correct - it's a
form of recognition between members of the Fraternity -- very similar
to olden day Christians drawing a picture of a fish in the dirt.
 
 

>But to show that I have no hard feelings, I have also crossposted this
>to alt.conspiracy.retards.

>Sister Rosa
 

I was going to delete the alt.conspiracy.retards newsgroup from this
posting, but felt that they too should see you at your best.  Thank
you for your time and interest, but perhaps you should stay out of
discussions involving a battle of wits when you're unarmed <smile>.
 
 

Mike
 
 

--
NRA LifeMember  NRA Golden Eagles Charter Founder   NRA-ILA   AOPA   DAN
AMA LifeMember  CPRA LifeMember   Retreads   HOG   TeamOS/2   Bagpiper
Master Mason   32nd degree Scottish Rite   Knight Templar   Shriner   Sailor
IronHorsemen M/C   ---------    Hooligans' M/C   ---------   SightSeers' M/C



ubject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] (Elder Perm Poom)
Date:         1997/01/21
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

> [email protected] (Palace of Jackals) writes:
>
> >Stiler, you genius, learn how to edit newsgroups and then shove your
> >Ouija board right up your tight ass.   You are on alt.fan.gene-scott,
> >I am on alt.fan.gene-scott.....and I don't know nothing 'bout no
> >chumpy ass old dumbfuck men and their secret handshakes....
> >I do know you dissed Tom, a member of fine standing around here only
> >replying to what was in this group, not YOUR group....and at that I
> >growl at you sir, Grrrrrrrr, yes Growl!!!!  GRRRRRRRRR...

My God, Sister Rose... You are truly beautiful when you're angry!

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] (Michael
Stiler) wrote:

> As for 'chumpy ass old dumb**** men', you obviously
> haven't been seeing the new blood coming into the Masonic Lodges -
> bright, educated young men (they start at 21 years of age and go up from
> there.

I would like to nominate Brother George Grena to your organization.
He is about as uncommon a person as I've had the pleasure of
meeting. He may not exactly be new blood, but he spouts like it.

> The secret handshake part you've *almost* got correct - it's a
> form of recognition between members of the Fraternity -- very similar
> to olden day Christians drawing a picture of a fish in the dirt.

That's not a form of recognition, that's a menu!

> I was going to delete the alt.conspiracy.retards newsgroup from this
> posting, but felt that they too should see you at your best.  Thank
> you for your time and interest, but perhaps you should stay out of
> discussions involving a battle of wits when you're unarmed <smile>.

OK... I was putting up with your insults good naturedly until you
got to that damn "<smile>" thing... Nobody, (and I mean nobody!)
points an emoticon (or its text eqivalent...) at Sister Rose and
gets away with it as long as I'm lurking.

You can just pack up your truck and get a move on. We don't allow
your kind in these parts. G'won! Git!

Elder Perm Poom
The First Internet McChurch Tabernacle
http:mcchurch.org

Mentioned in the Book of Revelations and the February issue of
Esquire magazine... The First Internet McChurch Tabernacle is
the ONLY organized religion with a drive through window.



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] (Palace of Jackals)
Date:         1997/01/21
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

On 21 Jan 1997 20:48:11 GMT, [email protected] (Michael Stiler)
wrote:
 

|>Actually, Sister Rosa, if you had checked Tom Brown's _ORIGINAL_ post,
|>you'd have seen that it was *HE* that posted into the Freemasonry
|>newsgroups.

Lies Lies Lies
 

|>hesitation; perhaps you need to study more about the Masonic Fraternity?

why? you don't let woman participate do you?  What is the woman's role
in Masonry?

|>Well, no foolin', Sister Rosa?  Alt.fan.gene-scott?  Wow.  I'm impressed.
|>If you'd _happen_ to pay attention before you wrote something, you'd
|>have known that I happen to watch Dr. Scott when he's on tv - I actually
|>enjoy him.  So perhaps let's agree that you're wrong on this.

Wrong on what?  I'm not followin' here....and as for paying attention,
absolutely not.

> Now if
|>you'd only learn something about Masonry, then we could have a rational
|>discussion.

Mason's Killed my pappy at the Battle of ButtonHollow.  I will take my
revenge here and now, Stiler.

>Your 'growling' is understood as your in-attentive-ness to
|>follow a discussion from it's beginning; and like my pet dog at home
|>I understand the lack of higher intelligence demonstrated by you.

You wanna get on all fours and chase a ball with me?  I love chasin'
balls.  And rolling around in dead squirrels!  Do Masons roll around
in dead squirrel or do they just use their blood to paint their
nipples?

|>I was going to delete the alt.conspiracy.retards newsgroup from this
|>posting, but felt that they too should see you at your best.

I think they are!  Retards just motherfucking love me.

>  Thank
|>you for your time and interest, but perhaps you should stay out of
|>discussions involving a battle of wits when you're unarmed <smile>.

boy, I'm glad you wrote that <smile> part or I would have thougth you
was being just plain mean mean mean.
As for staying out of a "discussion" which this is not by the way,
this is just me irritating you so badly that you probably have bored
everyone in your mensa meeting by retelling the indignancies of having
to put up with such a dullard such as myself, I will not stay out.
Regardless of whatever you are blathering on about me bothering
you....the fact remains that I am reading you from where I have always
been...alt.fan.gene-scott.
And if you and your little Mason's don't like  reading me then take
this newsgroup out.
And for thinking I'm so stupid and beneath your superior
intellect.....you sure wrote alot back to me.  I would have thought
you were smart enough to know that I couldn't possibly understand an
educated word you said.
But would you please answer this post back with lots and lots of
paragraphs I wont understand too?  Maybe I can better myself through
your fine example of "A Smart Man".

Except, I *am* a goddamn idiot, and as long as you keep coming back
here I will use all my powers of abject stupidity to prove it!

stiler=wussy

Sister (Retard) Rosa



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] (Michael Stiler)
Date:         1997/01/22
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

  Article Segment 1 of 2
  (Get All 2 Segments)

[email protected] (Palace of Jackals) writes:
>On 21 Jan 1997 20:48:11 GMT, (Michael Stiler) >wrote:

>|>Actually, Sister Rosa, if you had checked Tom Brown's _ORIGINAL_ post,
>|>you'd have seen that it was *HE* that posted into the Freemasonry
>|>newsgroups.

>Lies Lies Lies

Hi again, Sister Rosa!

Sorry, but I'm afraid you're wrong on this one.  His post came to us in the
Masonic newsgroup, which it why I posted back to him.  That makes him first,
me second.  Kapish?
 
 

>|>hesitation; perhaps you need to study more about the Masonic Fraternity?

>why? you don't let woman participate do you?  What is the woman's role
>in Masonry?

We most certainly do allow them to participate.  In fact, there are even
WOMEN-ONLY Masons, CO-Masons (men and women) and MEN-ONLY Masons.  Yer
takes yer picks and jerns the ones yer wants to jern! (--Popeye).  Aren't
you glad you're getting all this education for free?
 
 

>|>Well, no foolin', Sister Rosa?  Alt.fan.gene-scott?  Wow.  I'm impressed.
>|>If you'd _happen_ to pay attention before you wrote something, you'd
>|>have known that I happen to watch Dr. Scott when he's on tv - I actually
>|>enjoy him.  So perhaps let's agree that you're wrong on this.

>Wrong on what?  I'm not followin' here....and as for paying attention,
>absolutely not.

Wrong about my not liking Dr. Scott.  You're absolutely correct....and you're
absolutely correct <smile>
 
 

>> Now if
>|>you'd only learn something about Masonry, then we could have a rational
>|>discussion.

>Mason's Killed my pappy at the Battle of ButtonHollow.  I will take my
>revenge here and now, Stiler.

Well, here comes the time when you have a chance to put up or hush up.  Tell
us _who_ your *pappy* was, _where_ the Battle of ButtonHollow was that your
*pappy* was killed at, and _when_ the Battle of ButtonHollow was and _what_
your *pappy* was doing there.  Also include why you think it was Masons that
may have anything to do with your *pappy* (ya know, I hope you don't mind my
saying this, but your using the word *pappy* as a means to describe your
_father_ being killed sounds like you might, just might, be blowin' smoke up
our nether regions - so please give us some precise info, hmmm?).  As for
revenge, you should always take that where you can find it.  Making sure, of
course, that the person you're seeking revenge against isn't already looking
to add *your* scalp to *their* collection <grin>.
 
 

>>Your 'growling' is understood as your in-attentive-ness to
>|>follow a discussion from it's beginning; and like my pet dog at home
>|>I understand the lack of higher intelligence demonstrated by you.

>You wanna get on all fours and chase a ball with me?  I love chasin'
>balls.  And rolling around in dead squirrels!  Do Masons roll around
>in dead squirrel or do they just use their blood to paint their
>nipples?

Actually, some of us Masons love Brunswick Stew (Squirrel Stew).  It's
even been served at some Lodge dinners (along with rabbit and 'possum).
Rolling around or painting???  Kinky.  Ya know, I kinda like you in
the way that a father may feel towards a slow child <huge grin>!
 
 
 

>|>I was going to delete the alt.conspiracy.retards newsgroup from this
>|>posting, but felt that they too should see you at your best.

>I think they are!  Retards just motherfucking love me.

Why don't I find that unusual???
 
 

>>  Thank
>|>you for your time and interest, but perhaps you should stay out of
>|>discussions involving a battle of wits when you're unarmed <smile>.

>boy, I'm glad you wrote that <smile> part or I would have thougth you
>was being just plain mean mean mean.

Actually, I'm rather a nice person.  I haven't killed anyone since I
left Texas. <sadistic smile that doesn't reach to my eyes>
 
 

>As for staying out of a "discussion" which this is not by the way,
>this is just me irritating you so badly that you probably have bored
>everyone in your mensa meeting by retelling the indignancies of having
>to put up with such a dullard such as myself, I will not stay out.
Believe me, you're the very last person that I would call irritating.
Not bright.  But not irritating, either. <lol>
 
 

>Regardless of whatever you are blathering on about me bothering
>you....the fact remains that I am reading you from where I have always
>been...alt.fan.gene-scott.

I'm sure that it's a fine newsgroup, and truthfully, I'm glad your there.
There's only one person on the Masonic Newsgroups whose been 'badmouthing'
Dr. Scott - and that person is not even a Mason!  His name is Daryl
Carstensen (aka Tweety, Vince, Tor, Porky, Plutonium, Creature, etc.) and
if Dr. Scott could get some of the posts that that fool Daryl has been
posting about him, Dr. Scott would have a perfect basis for a lawsuit.

Hmmmm, ya know.  You might even be able to curry a little favor with the
good Dr. Scott.  You could use DejaNews and search around on the
alt.freemasonry newsgroup for the last couple of days (perhaps a week).
Search on words like "alt.fan.gene_scott" _and_ anything posted by Daryl's
various names above (most likely "Tweety").  I know Daryl used the word
*degenerate* in the particular post that I'm thinking about (he couldn't
figure out how to spell *denigrate*); so make sure you use that in the
search clause.  Get that post and send it on to Dr. Scott - there could
be some money coming through to the good Dr. in a libel/slander lawsuit!
 

>And if you and your little Mason's don't like  reading me then take
>this newsgroup out.

Howsabout after you get this post that we only use email to each other?
This way we stop soiling both of our groups.
 
 

>And for thinking I'm so stupid and beneath your superior
>intellect.....you sure wrote alot back to me.  I would have thought
>you were smart enough to know that I couldn't possibly understand an
>educated word you said.
 

I don't think you're stupid.  I think you opened your mouth and spewed a
bunch of nonesense about Masonry without having any real knowledge about
which you were talking.  It's that simple.
 
 

>But would you please answer this post back with lots and lots of
>paragraphs I wont understand too?  Maybe I can better myself through
>your fine example of "A Smart Man".

Sure, my pleasure.  Many paragraphs help prevent run-on sentences <smile>.
Perhaps you can 'better' yourself with a better understanding of what
the Fraternity of Freemasonry is actually about - not what you seem to
think it is; or what someone else told you it is.  Go to a library and
do some _honest_ research on your own.  This is how you would 'better'
yourself.
 
 

>Except, I *am* a goddamn idiot, and as long as you keep coming back
>here I will use all my powers of abject stupidity to prove it!

[begin serious mode]
Well, that's OK.  Just remember that everything you say gets seen by
potentially millions of people - some of whom can be your friends,
your parents, your clergy, your bosses and business associates.  Your
future might depend on some of these and, while you may be 'feigning'
idiocy, they might not know that and assume that you really are the
way you come across in your posts.
[end serious mode]
 
 

>stiler=wussy

Naah!  But it works to my advantage that you think that.  Remember we
were talking about revenge above there.  People often get had by those
they don't suspect, eh?
 

>Sister (xxxxxx) Rosa
---------^^^^^^------

You shouldn't think of yourself like that.  It could be like that old saw
your parents might have told you about "crossing your eyes" - Don't do it.
they might get stuck that way.
 
 
 

As always, Sister Rosa, a pleasure chatting with you.

Mike
 
 

--
NRA LifeMember  NRA Golden Eagles Charter Founder   NRA-ILA   AOPA   DAN
AMA LifeMember  CPRA LifeMember   Retreads   HOG   TeamOS/2   Bagpiper
Master Mason   32nd degree Scottish Rite   Knight Templar   Shriner   Sailor
IronHorsemen M/C   ---------    Hooligans' M/C   ---------   SightSeers' M/C



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] (Brien Sullivan)
Date:         1997/01/22
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

In article <[email protected]>,
   [email protected] (Michael Stiler) wrote:
<smile>
<grin>.
<huge grin>!
<smile>.
<smile>
<sadistic smile that doesn't reach to my eyes>
<lol>
[begin serious mode]

[end serious mode]

Really, you guys may be great at conspiring with the Jews to take over
the world, but your style is a disgrace to the alt.* hierarchy.

>Hmmmm, ya know.  You might even be able to curry a little favor with
>the good Dr. Scott.

Now stop this Mikey. You're giving me a hernia (I bet you can tell
I'm laughing, out loud too, without my telling you with a cute li'l
stage direction).

--
0-
                                   -Brien-
                               {[email protected]}



[email protected] (Brien Sullivan) writes:

>In article <[email protected]>,
>   [email protected] (Michael Stiler) wrote:

>Really, you guys may be great at conspiring with the Jews to take over
>the world, but your style is a disgrace to the alt.* hierarchy.
 

Wha'?  You mean we haven't done finished doing that yet?  I was under
the impression that we had taken over the world eons ago.  Besides,
it's not the Jews that we're conspiring with; it's the Snake People
living under the Bonneville Salt Flats in Utah that we're conspiring
with.

My apologies for not being *stylistic* enough...
 
 

>>Hmmmm, ya know.  You might even be able to curry a little favor with
>>the good Dr. Scott.

>Now stop this Mikey. You're giving me a hernia (I bet you can tell
>I'm laughing, out loud too, without my telling you with a cute li'l
>stage direction).

>                                   -Brien-
 

I'll stop if you will.  If a person's writing was clear enough to never
need 'smileys' or <grins> then they wouldn't be used.  But you can never
tell about the understanding on the receiving end.  Things like 'stage
direction' simply help to convey the writers intent; that's why authors
write things like "John laughed out loud" or "Sally replied in a braying
voice "You're a horse's ass".  They're just a way of being sure that
something is understood the same way on both ends.  It doesn't matter
whether you're in alt.* or whatever, if a person can't physically see
you then they often can't determine your intent.  Why, a person could
even end up disliking you enough from what you write to hunt you down
and harm you. (I'll leave you to figure out 'stage direction' to that
last sentence.)
 

Mike
 

--
NRA LifeMember  NRA Golden Eagles Charter Founder   NRA-ILA   AOPA   DAN
AMA LifeMember  CPRA LifeMember   Retreads   HOG   TeamOS/2   Bagpiper
Master Mason   32nd degree Scottish Rite   Knight Templar   Shriner   Sailor
IronHorsemen M/C   ---------    Hooligans' M/C   ---------   SightSeers' M/C



In article <[email protected]>,
   [email protected] (Michael Stiler) wrote:
>Why, a person could even end up disliking you enough from what you write to
>hunt you down and harm you. (I'll leave you to figure out 'stage direction' to
>that last sentence.)

>Mike

Careful Mikey. It's shit like this that entitles me to one free letter
to your postmaster.

--
0-
                                   -Brien-
                               {[email protected]}



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] (Palace of Jackals)
Date:         1997/01/23
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

On 23 Jan 1997 01:21:37 GMT, [email protected] (Michael Stiler)
wrote:

 
|>Why, a person could even end up disliking you enough from what you write to hunt you down
|>and harm you. (I'll leave you to figure out 'stage direction' to that
|>last sentence.)
|>
|>
|>Mike

allright, Stiler, your monkey like appeal has worn off with that
remark.  Get the fuck out of here.

Sister Rosa



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         "W'h'eezer Wilco" <[email protected]>
Date:         1997/01/23
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

Michael Stiler <[email protected]> wrote in article

> Why, a person could
> even end up disliking you enough from what you write to hunt you down
> and harm you. (I'll leave you to figure out 'stage direction' to that
> last sentence.)
>
>
> Mike

Whoa, there, Mikey.  You seem to have all the hairs on your fez standing
up.  Maybe you just need to breathe.  That's it.  In....Out.....

I think all us over here will just take that lack of stage direction as a
"ha ha, just kiddin' backslap".  A 32nd degree go-cart jockey such as
yourself wouldn't go around making threats where "potentially millions of
people - some of whom can be your friends, your parents, your clergy, your
bosses and business associates" could possibly see it.

Glad all this is cleared up. :)
-W'h'eezer



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] (Palace of Jackals)
Date:         1997/01/22
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

On 22 Jan 1997 05:35:16 GMT, [email protected] (Michael Stiler)
wrote:
 

|>We most certainly do allow them to participate.  In fact, there are even
|>WOMEN-ONLY Masons, CO-Masons (men and women) and MEN-ONLY Masons.  Yer
|>takes yer picks and jerns the ones yer wants to jern! (--Popeye).  Aren't
|>you glad you're getting all this education for free?
|
Thank you, brother!   But I'm still not wearing shoes or strapping
*both* buckles on my overalls.

|>Well, here comes the time when you have a chance to put up or hush up.  Tell
|>us _who_ your *pappy* was, _where_ the Battle of ButtonHollow was that your
|>*pappy* was killed at, and _when_ the Battle of ButtonHollow was and _what_
|>your *pappy* was doing there.

uh.....Stiler....how do you read books or newspaper?  Cause if I can
remember what a smart librarian told me before she confiscated my
crack....books don't have <smile> <grin>  to clue you in on if you
should laugh or not.

|>Rolling around or painting???  Kinky.  Ya know, I kinda like you in
|>the way that a father may feel towards a slow child <huge grin>!

oh.  in that case you must mean  <huge boner>!

Actually, I'm rather a nice person.  I haven't killed anyone since I
|>left Texas. <sadistic smile that doesn't reach to my eyes>

<fist caught in a jar of lightenin' bugs>

|>Believe me, you're the very last person that I would call irritating.
|>Not bright.  But not irritating, either. <lol>

I have freely admitted to being a full on stump-headed know nothing.
You can't bag me on that one, Stiler.  I'm pig ignorant.  And I'm FAT
with bad teeth.  I've barely understood a word you said even with your
helpful retard guides <smile> <grin> <beat off> <cry>
So howsa about you change your tact and make me feel bad by telling me
just how goddamn  smart you are?

|>Howsabout after you get this post that we only use email to each other?
|>This way we stop soiling both of our groups.
|
Don't you dare send me private e-mail.  Newsgroups are one thing, but
my inbox......not just anyone gets in my inbox, Stiler.  Certainly not
you.  Don't e-mail me. ever.

|>I don't think you're stupid.  I think you opened your mouth and spewed a
|>bunch of nonesense about Masonry without having any real knowledge about
|>which you were talking.  It's that simple.

oh!  is that what this is all about?
hell no I don't know anything about Masons, don't care to either.  But
I'm still going to go along with the crowd and think you are Satan
worshipping baby rapers....although I really don't believe it.  Satan
worshipping baby rapers have senses of humor.
You Stiler.....you just have retard guides <smiles at flatulence>
 

|>[begin serious mode]
|>Well, that's OK.  Just remember that everything you say gets seen by
|>potentially millions of people - some of whom can be your friends,
|>your parents, your clergy, your bosses and business associates.  Your
|>future might depend on some of these and, while you may be 'feigning'
|>idiocy, they might not know that and assume that you really are the
|>way you come across in your posts.

Yes, I have a reputation at stake.  Burning at the stake.
Stiler, I am free free free.....I've set myself up in life so I don't
have to give a damn what anyone thinks about me and no one can touch
me because of it.  You will not understand this concept even with as
bright and brainy as you are.  I got a life that if you could even for
a second fathom being up at 3am watching porn while doing my computer
job AT HOME, Stiler...AT HOME....oh, I bet your tight ass is just
ripping in two......I'll not go on with my pagan rituals at
sunrise....

|>Naah!  But it works to my advantage that you think that.  Remember we
|>were talking about revenge above there.  People often get had by those
|>they don't suspect, eh?

Santa Claus is going to hurt me?

Hail Satan!  Fist your mother! <falls off the wall>
OWWWWWW.....W'H'eezer!.....ouch ouch ouch....help me back up here so's
Mikey can have another run at me.

Sister Rosa



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] (Michael Stiler)
Date:         1997/01/23
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.conspiracy.retards,alt.freemasonry
[More Headers]

[email protected] (Palace of Jackals) writes:
>On 22 Jan 1997 05:35:16 GMT, (Michael Stiler) >wrote:
>
>|>Well, here comes the time when you have a chance to put up or hush up.  Tell
>|>us _who_ your *pappy* was, _where_ the Battle of ButtonHollow was that your
>|>*pappy* was killed at, and _when_ the Battle of ButtonHollow was and _what_
>|>your *pappy* was doing there.

[[ no response from Sister Rosa re: her *pappy* being killed by Masons ]]

I'll make the WAG here that since you didn't respond to this part of the post
that you were lying.  Doesn't say much for, or about you.  But then again, you
don't seem to think much of yourself either from the rest of the stuff you post.
 
 
 

>uh.....Stiler....how do you read books or newspaper?  Cause if I can
>remember what a smart librarian told me before she confiscated my
>crack....books don't have <smile> <grin>  to clue you in on if you
>should laugh or not.
 

Ah, yes.  Well, books will usually have they're *own* version of 'smileys',
or 'stage direction' as someone else put it.  The who idea is to convey INTENT.
Without knowing the intent of the message, the meaning is lost.  Simple, yes?
 
 
 
 

>|>Believe me, you're the very last person that I would call irritating.
>|>Not bright.  But not irritating, either. <lol>

>I have freely admitted to being a full on stump-headed know nothing.
>You can't bag me on that one, Stiler.  I'm pig ignorant.  And I'm FAT
>with bad teeth.  I've barely understood a word you said even with your
>helpful retard guides
>So howsa about you change your tact and make me feel bad by telling me
>just how goddamn  smart you are?
 

Well, the 'guides' are there to use if you need them.  According to your
paragraph above you do.  Others don't.
 
 
 

>|>I don't think you're stupid.  I think you opened your mouth and spewed a
>|>bunch of nonesense about Masonry without having any real knowledge about
>|>which you were talking.  It's that simple.

>oh!  is that what this is all about?
>hell no I don't know anything about Masons, don't care to either.
 

This was really all I was interested in hearing from you.  We're just supposed
to write you off as an ignorant liar and leave it at that.  Is that correct?
 
 

>Sister Rosa
 

Mike
 
 

--
NRA LifeMember  NRA Golden Eagles Charter Founder   NRA-ILA   AOPA   DAN
AMA LifeMember  CPRA LifeMember   Retreads   HOG   TeamOS/2   Bagpiper
Master Mason   32nd degree Scottish Rite   Knight Templar   Shriner   Sailor
IronHorsemen M/C   ---------    Hooligans' M/C   ---------   SightSeers' M/C



In article <[email protected]>,
   [email protected] (Michael Stiler) wrote:

>Ah, yes.  Well, books will usually have they're *own* version of 'smileys',
>or 'stage direction' as someone else put it.  The who idea is to convey INTENT.
 
>Without knowing the intent of the message, the meaning is lost.  Simple, yes?

That's what language is for dickhead <oops>.

I don't even use those things on IRC, but I can understand the
need for them there. But this is Usenet Bub; these things we write
here are called articles. There's no need to think on the fly. Would
you use 'smileys' in a letter to the editor? Or to your retarded
daughter?

--
0-
                                   -Brien-
                               {[email protected]}



 

Michael Stiler <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>...
> [email protected] (Palace of Jackals) writes:
> >On 21 Jan 1997 20:48:11 GMT, (Michael Stiler) >wrote:

Ring the bell! 208!

> Hi again, Sister Rosa!
>
> Sorry, but I'm afraid you're wrong on this one.

You're sorry that she's wrong?  You start out by apologizing and I assume
you're lying!

> Aren't
> you glad you're getting all this education for free?

We're getting the education.  Apparently, you aren't.
 
>  Also include why you think it was Masons that
> may have anything to do with your *pappy* (ya know, I hope you don't mind
my
> saying this, but your using the word *pappy* as a means to describe your
> _father_ being killed sounds like you might, just might, be blowin' smoke
up
> our nether regions - so please give us some precise info, hmmm?).

Sister Rosa blowin' smoke up your nether regions?  What makes you so damn
special?  Where's my smoke!?

> As for
> revenge, you should always take that where you can find it.  Making sure,
of
> course, that the person you're seeking revenge against isn't already
looking
> to add *your* scalp to *their* collection <grin>.

You're pretty damn clever, and we'd all do quite well to watch our step.
Revenge is sweet, to be sure, but you's a crafty one, Mikey.  Real damn
crafty. :):)  It's all fun and games 'till someone puts an eye out, huh?  I
wouldn't put any manner of low dispicable evil past you guys. Baby eaters.
And none of us will EVER forget Button Hollow.  Ask not for whom the bell
tolls: ask what you can do for the bell.  JEEEEEEEEHHHHHHAAAAAAD!

>
> Actually, some of us Masons love Brunswick Stew (Squirrel Stew).  It's
> even been served at some Lodge dinners (along with rabbit and 'possum).

Alright. OK.  I was playing around a little before.  Yeah, yeah, we got
hold of us a smart one, an ent-ee-lek-tu-al, possibly frum up noawrth or
somethin', but this THIS is where I draw the line.  Forget the Baby BBQs
and drinking the blood of young men, pledging your souls to Satan, and
keeping TV Nation off the networks...Eatin' possums is the most vile thing
I've EVER heard of you guys doing.  I have to get away from the keyboard
and be physically ill.  Excuse me, won't you?

> Rolling around or painting???  Kinky.  Ya know, I kinda like you in
> the way that a father may feel towards a slow child <huge grin>!

You're sick.  Sicker than I thought.

> >I think they are!  Retards just motherfucking love me.
>
> Why don't I find that unusual???

Ha!  We love YOU TOO MIKEY!

> >boy, I'm glad you wrote that <smile> part or I would have thougth you
> >was being just plain mean mean mean.
>
> Actually, I'm rather a nice person.  I haven't killed anyone since I
> left Texas. <sadistic smile that doesn't reach to my eyes>

Boy, this is like some kinda play or something.  I'm all enthralled....

> >And for thinking I'm so stupid and beneath your superior
> >intellect.....you sure wrote alot back to me.  I would have thought
> >you were smart enough to know that I couldn't possibly understand an
> >educated word you said.
>
>
> I don't think you're stupid.  I think you opened your mouth and spewed a
> bunch of nonesense about Masonry without having any real knowledge about
> which you were talking.  It's that simple.

Spewing nonsense is what we do.  Call it a talent.  Yeah, you'll take that
shot that I left wide open, and that'll just prove how clueless you are.
The Good Book says "Answer not a fool according to his folly" but you
LUCIFERIAN DEVIL WORSHIPING BABYEATERS wouldn't know that, since you have
to renounce the Lord when you take your dark and unsavory oaths.  Why all
the secrecy?  What are you hiding?

> [begin serious mode]

Glad he said that.

> [end serious mode]

Whew
>
> Mike

Respectfully wiping the smirk off my face (or at least trying)
-W'h'eezer

***************************************
NRA  (National Retards Association) LifeMember   NRA Labrador Finch Clench
Charter Owner NRA-PEE DOPE-A ROPE-A POPE-A Anagram Horizon LifeMember
CPONBOSCH LifeMember Retards PIG TeamAmigaDOS TapeRecorder
MasterPipeLayer 32nd degree Kentucky Rite Knight Tempura Shiner HelloSailor
  IronTerriermen C/S  Fooligans' C/S   and Gun Repair
--


Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         Tweety <[email protected]>
Date:         1997/01/26
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

Michael Stiler wrote:
>
        alt.fan.gene-scott.
>
> I'm sure that it's a fine newsgroup, and truthfully, I'm glad your there.
> There's only one person on the Masonic Newsgroups whose been 'badmouthing'
> Dr. Scott - and that person is not even a Mason!  His name is Daryl
> Carstensen (aka Tweety, Vince, Tor, Porky, Plutonium, Creature, etc.)
 

        You forgot joken, muse, enchanter, and all other
        anti-masons.

> and
> if Dr. Scott could get some of the posts that that fool Daryl has been
> posting about him, Dr. Scott would have a perfect basis for a lawsuit.

        I hope Scott gets them. Let him try and sue. Ha ha ha ha.

>
> Hmmmm, ya know.  You might even be able to curry a little favor with the
> good Dr. Scott.  You could use DejaNews and search around on the
> alt.freemasonry newsgroup for the last couple of days (perhaps a week).
> Search on words like "alt.fan.gene_scott" _and_ anything posted by Daryl's
> various names above (most likely "Tweety").  I know Daryl used the word
> *degenerate* in the particular post that I'm thinking about (he couldn't
> figure out how to spell *denigrate*); so make sure you use that in the
> search clause.  Get that post and send it on to Dr. Scott -
 
        Yes please do. I can't wait.

> there could
> be some money coming through to the good Dr. in a libel/slander lawsuit!

        I only tell the truth. Gene Scott is a degenerate.
>
> >And if you and your little Mason's don't like  reading me then take
> >this newsgroup out.

        I don't like reading you.



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] (Brien Sullivan)
Date:         1997/01/27
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]
 

Leetle Red Rosa wrote:
>> >And if you and your little Mason's don't like  reading me then take
>> >this newsgroup out.

Tweety <[email protected]> wrote:
>       I don't like reading you.

Then, like she said to the little Masons, Daryl. You won't
be missed.

--
0-
                                   -Brien-
                               {[email protected]}



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         "penis breath" <[email protected]>
Date:         1997/01/26
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

hey cunt lick . . . eat shit and live to taste it for many many years!

begin 600 blow039.jpg
<uuencoded_portion_removed>



FUCK YOU, CUNT LICK!

Palace of Jackals <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>...
> On 21 Jan 1997 20:48:11 GMT, [email protected] (Michael Stiler)
> wrote:
>
>
> |>Actually, Sister Rosa, if you had checked Tom Brown's _ORIGINAL_ post,
> |>you'd have seen that it was *HE* that posted into the Freemasonry
> |>newsgroups.
>
> Lies Lies Lies
>
>
> |>hesitation; perhaps you need to study more about the Masonic
Fraternity?
>
> why? you don't let woman participate do you?  What is the woman's role
> in Masonry?
>
> |>Well, no foolin', Sister Rosa?  Alt.fan.gene-scott?  Wow.  I'm
impressed.
> |>If you'd _happen_ to pay attention before you wrote something, you'd
> |>have known that I happen to watch Dr. Scott when he's on tv - I
actually
> |>enjoy him.  So perhaps let's agree that you're wrong on this.
>
> Wrong on what?  I'm not followin' here....and as for paying attention,
> absolutely not.
>
> > Now if
> |>you'd only learn something about Masonry, then we could have a rational
> |>discussion.
>
> Mason's Killed my pappy at the Battle of ButtonHollow.  I will take my
> revenge here and now, Stiler.
>
> >Your 'growling' is understood as your in-attentive-ness to
> |>follow a discussion from it's beginning; and like my pet dog at home
> |>I understand the lack of higher intelligence demonstrated by you.
>
> You wanna get on all fours and chase a ball with me?  I love chasin'
> balls.  And rolling around in dead squirrels!  Do Masons roll around
> in dead squirrel or do they just use their blood to paint their
> nipples?
>
> |>I was going to delete the alt.conspiracy.retards newsgroup from this
> |>posting, but felt that they too should see you at your best.
>
> I think they are!  Retards just motherfucking love me.
>
> >  Thank
> |>you for your time and interest, but perhaps you should stay out of
> |>discussions involving a battle of wits when you're unarmed <smile>.
>
> boy, I'm glad you wrote that <smile> part or I would have thougth you
> was being just plain mean mean mean.
> As for staying out of a "discussion" which this is not by the way,
> this is just me irritating you so badly that you probably have bored
> everyone in your mensa meeting by retelling the indignancies of having
> to put up with such a dullard such as myself, I will not stay out.
> Regardless of whatever you are blathering on about me bothering
> you....the fact remains that I am reading you from where I have always
> been...alt.fan.gene-scott.
> And if you and your little Mason's don't like  reading me then take
> this newsgroup out.
> And for thinking I'm so stupid and beneath your superior
> intellect.....you sure wrote alot back to me.  I would have thought
> you were smart enough to know that I couldn't possibly understand an
> educated word you said.
> But would you please answer this post back with lots and lots of
> paragraphs I wont understand too?  Maybe I can better myself through
> your fine example of "A Smart Man".
>
> Except, I *am* a goddamn idiot, and as long as you keep coming back
> here I will use all my powers of abject stupidity to prove it!
>
> stiler=wussy
>
> Sister (Retard) Rosa
>



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         ":-0" <[email protected]>
Date:         1997/01/26
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

Suck your sister's cunt, bitch!  Of course, she probably won't suck yours
because it's all moldy, smelly and full of feces.  You're too stupid to use
a vibrator and instead, you grab turds off the street and shove them up
your rotten crotch to get off.
 

           x
        xxxxx
     xxxxxxxxx
        xxxxx
        xxxxx
        xxxxx
        xxxxx
        xxxxx
        xxxxx
  xx   xxxxx   xx
xxxx  xxxxx  xxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 SUCK IT OFF!



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         "W'h'eezer Wilco" <[email protected]>
Date:         1997/01/27
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

:-0 <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>...

ASCII ART!  That's what they do in those secret meetings!

Fuckin' baby-eaters...
-W'h'eezer



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] (Elder Perm Poom)
Date:         1997/01/27
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

In article <[email protected]>, ":-0"
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Suck your sister's cunt, bitch!  Of course, she probably won't suck yours
> because it's all moldy, smelly and full of feces.  You're too stupid to use
> a vibrator and instead, you grab turds off the street and shove them up
> your rotten crotch to get off.

Welcome home, Brother Grena!

Elder Perm Poom
The First Internet McChurch Tabernacle
Mentioned in the Book of Revelations and in the February issue
of Esquire Magazine

Visit and be *permanently* and *irrevokably* REDEEMED!

http://mcchurch.org



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         Brother Dave <[email protected]>
Date:         1997/01/21
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

Michael Stiler ([email protected]) wrote:

[Sister Rosa's demonic dross snipped]

> Well, no foolin', Sister Rosa?  Alt.fan.gene-scott?  Wow.  I'm impressed.
> If you'd _happen_ to pay attention before you wrote something, you'd
> have known that I happen to watch Dr. Scott when he's on tv - I actually
> enjoy him.  So perhaps let's agree that you're wrong on this.  Now if
> you'd only learn something about Masonry, then we could have a rational
> discussion.  Your 'growling' is understood as your in-attentive-ness to
> follow a discussion from it's beginning; and like my pet dog at home
> I understand the lack of higher intelligence demonstrated by you.

Sister Rosa has no meaning in her life. That is why she makes fun of
other people's religions and stuff. Alt.fan.gene-scott has been beset
by mockers ever since its very inception. These people are the walking
dead. They have nothing better to do with their demonic selves than to
try and overleaven every newsgroup full of sincere people they come
across. It is  no surprise then these accursed who walk among us bear
The Mark of the Yeast.

> I haven't figured out where the Ouija board comes into the conversation
> though <grin>.  As for 'chumpy ass old dumb**** men', you obviously
> haven't been seeing the new blood coming into the Masonic Lodges -
> bright, educated young men (they start at 21 years of age and go up from
> there.  The secret handshake part you've *almost* got correct - it's a
> form of recognition between members of the Fraternity -- very similar
> to olden day Christians drawing a picture of a fish in the dirt.

Ever since Sister Rosa and her ilk cross-posted to rec.arts.puppetry,
we've used a fist in the sand, so Doctor Scott fans understand the
need for a ritual to find out who's for real and who isn't.

BEGONE, Sister Rosa, and leave these Masons -- and us -- in peace!!!

--
Brother Dave



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] (Elder Perm Poom)
Date:         1997/01/21
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

In article <[email protected]>, Brother Dave
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Ever since Sister Rosa and her ilk cross-posted to rec.arts.puppetry,
> we've used a fist in the sand, so Doctor Scott fans understand the
> need for a ritual to find out who's for real and who isn't.

I take offense at being referred to as "ILK". I am not ILK.
I am...

Yours Sincerely,
Elder Perm Poom
The First Internet McChurch Tabernacle
http://mcchurch.org

Mentioned in the Book of Revelations and the February issue of
Esquire, McChurch is still the ONLY organized religion with a
drive through window.



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         "Dennis Bosch" <[email protected]>
Date:         1997/01/22
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

Brother Dave <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>...
> Michael Stiler ([email protected]) wrote:
>
>
> Ever since Sister Rosa and her ilk cross-posted to rec.arts.puppetry,
> we've used a fist in the sand, so Doctor Scott fans understand the
> need for a ritual to find out who's for real and who isn't.
>
> BEGONE, Sister Rosa, and leave these Masons -- and us -- in peace!!!
>
> --
> Brother Dave
>

Once again, amen, Brother Dave.

-Dennis



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] (Brother Paul)
Date:         1997/01/22
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

Brother Dave <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>. These people are the walking
>dead.
*
*  The gospel according to Phil D.
BP



Michael Stiler <[email protected]> wrote in article

>La Dia Roja stated:
>
> >Herr Stiler...
> >..."we don't care what the hell you post"   and we don't eat babies or
> >hate the Black Man.
> >well, I don't know for sure about the baby part.
>
> I'm happy to know that your group, along with ours (and of course, most
> of the civilized world) don't eat babies or hate black people.  I'm at
> least _very_sure_ about the baby part, while you seem to have some
> hesitation; perhaps you need to study more about the Masonic Fraternity?

I did know a Mason that ate babies.  So there.  And I'm not saying that's a
*bad* thing.  I'm just saying, you know?

> Well, no foolin', Sister Rosa?  Alt.fan.gene-scott?  Wow.  I'm impressed.
> If you'd _happen_ to pay attention before you wrote something, you'd
> have known that I happen to watch Dr. Scott when he's on tv - I actually
> enjoy him.

And we ALL know Doc eats babies.

> So perhaps let's agree that you're wrong on this.

Let's agree that you're about to get the horns on this.  You know the
secret "bulb boys" handshake, I assume, too?

> Now if
> you'd only learn something about Masonry, then we could have a rational
> discussion.

We're all having a discussion on it now.  Hell with rational!  You mean to
tell me you PAY MONEY for and account with an ISP to get RATIONAL on your
free time?  You mason guys *are* pretty messed up.

What the hell makes you tink we'd even *want* to have a rational discussion
about a bunch of racist baby-eaters anyway?

> Your 'growling' is understood as your in-attentive-ness to
> follow a discussion from it's beginning; and like my pet dog at home
> I understand the lack of higher intelligence demonstrated by you.

And your continued posting to newsgroups where you *know* you're just going
to get more and more of the same, is evidence that you might not be
book-dumb, but you have no damn sense whatsoever.  I hate you baby-eaters,
just hate you.

> I haven't figured out where the Ouija board comes into the conversation
> though <grin>.  As for 'chumpy ass old dumb**** men', you obviously
> haven't been seeing the new blood coming into the Masonic Lodges -
> bright, educated young men

Ouija boards, sly grins, blood of young men.  We're on to something here.
I'm going to see if maybe Dennis can convince Phil to blow the lid off this
whole thing.  You bigots and your sick SICK practices make me want to
retch.

> (they start at 21 years of age and go up from
> there.  The secret handshake part you've *almost* got correct -

Rosa?  You know the secret handshake?  What do you know that *you're* not
tellin'?  Don't hold out on us, hon.

> >But to show that I have no hard feelings, I have also crossposted this
> >to alt.conspiracy.retards.
>
> I was going to delete the alt.conspiracy.retards newsgroup from this
> posting, but felt that they too should see you at your best.

You really didn't have to, though, we usually do.  But it *was* a rare
glimpse of *you* at your best, Mikey.  Thank you for sharing, and we look
forward to your replies with 'baited' breath.

> Thank
> you for your time and interest, but perhaps you should stay out of
> discussions involving a battle of wits when you're unarmed <smile>.

And you brought out the big guns, just for us!
>
> Mike
> --
How could I mock someone with such credentials?
-Wheezer

> NRA LifeMember  NRA Golden Eagles Charter Founder   NRA-ILA   AOPA   DAN
> AMA LifeMember  CPRA LifeMember   Retreads   HOG   TeamOS/2   Bagpiper
> Master Mason   32nd degree Scottish Rite   Knight Templar   Shriner
Sailor
> IronHorsemen M/C   ---------    Hooligans' M/C   ---------   SightSeers'
M/C
>

"Keep Spreading Lies..." - Lee Harvey
 --
***************************************
NRA  (National Retards Association) LifeMember   NRA Labrador Finch Clench
Charter Owner   NRA-PEE   DOPE-A ROPE-A POPE-A   Anagram Horizon LifeMember
  CPONBOSCH LifeMember   Retards   PIG   TeamAmigaDOS TapeRecorder   Master
PipeLayer   32nd degree Kentucky Rite   Knight Tempura Shiner   Hello
Sailor   IronTerriermen C/S  Fooligans' C/S   and Gun Repair



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         Do-Nut Boy
Date:         1997/01/21
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott
[More Headers]
 

>> >..."we don't care what the hell you post"   and we don't eat babies or
>> >hate the Black Man.
>> >well, I don't know for sure about the baby part.
>>
>> I'm happy to know that your group, along with ours (and of course, most
>> of the civilized world) don't eat babies or hate black people.  I'm at
>> least _very_sure_ about the baby part, while you seem to have some
>> hesitation; perhaps you need to study more about the Masonic Fraternity?
>
>I did know a Mason that ate babies.  So there.  And I'm not saying that's a
>*bad* thing.  I'm just saying, you know?

>And we ALL know Doc eats babies.

>book-dumb, but you have no damn sense whatsoever.  I hate you baby-eaters,
>just hate you.
 
 

                           AMERICA
 

We are all America: all part of the pain and sufering and the agony
of America; all feeding the agony and conflict of America - whether
we are for or against or indifferent and unconcerned; whether we care
or not.

We will all be concerned in the outcome of America even if we don`t
feel concerned now. We all share the future.

America eats it`s young - maybe. But America is also our child, is now
how we all have made it; has become what we have wanted it to be. America
reflects to us what we have come to. The state of America is our state.

America eats it`s young. But we eat America,pollute it abuse it, rape it
take from it,destroy it. As we give so do we recieve. As we give to America
and all her factions, so do we recieve from America and all her factions.
Do we give love or do we give fear and hate ? America is racked with conflict;
our conflict; the conflict of rich and poor,have and have not,black and white,
male and female,order and chaos,hawk and dove,love and hate,old and young,
right and left.

But it`s our conflict,not America`s, no matter what side of the fence we
are on. The question is: Does what we are doing from our particular side
have positive or negative effects? Is what we are doing aimed at reconciliation
of the conflict, or just getting our way at the other sides expense ? What
about the "opposition" ? What do they feel ? Or are we our own opposition,
our own enemy ?

What is missing ? What does America need most ? What are her children lacking ?
How can we banish evil ? What can we give to our enemies ? Who is Satan ?
Who is Dr.Scott ? Christ help us: we are lost.lost in our fury,lost in our
blame, lost in our apathy, Call to us,call to us !!!!

What can we give to our enemies ?

LOVE ? LOVE OUR ENEMIES ? LOVE SATAN ? LOVE DR.SCOTT ???

What is Love ? How can we put love into action ? Christ help us: it`s not
easy. How can we break the spiral that is breaking America,is breaking us??

Christ teaches; If we want satisfaction,the only way we can have it is by
giving generously to Dr. Gene Scott

Christ help us it`s not easy.
 

http://www.geocities.com/TelevisionCity/2604



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         "Dennis Bosch" <[email protected]>
Date:         1997/01/22
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.conspiracy.retards,alt.fan.gene-scott
[More Headers]
 

Do-Nut Boy wrote in article <[email protected]>...
>                            AMERICA
>
>
> We are all America: all part of the pain and sufering and the agony
> of America; all feeding the agony and conflict of America - whether
> we are for or against or indifferent and unconcerned; whether we care
> or not.

I, for one, care.  And since becoming a part of this newsgroup, first
lurking, then actively posting from my jail cell, I have seen the light and
the error of my ways.  There is no right nor wrong in my homeland, the US.
Whether we eat babies or create morealibritarian art on a canvas of urine,
there is no one truth, except the teachings of our good doctor.  I hereby
renounce all my works and repent.  And I can only hope that you all are led
by this message, this prayer, and the spirit of the Lord, to go and do ye
likewise, as Do-nut boy has suggested.

Amen, and peace be with you,
-Dennis



Subject:      Re: What's going on here (formerly: Re: Gene Scott's Ego)
From:         [email protected] (Brien Sullivan)
Date:         1997/01/22
Message-Id:   <[email protected]>
Newsgroups:   alt.fan.gene-scott,alt.freemasonry,alt.masonic.members,alt.conspiracy.retards
[More Headers]

In article <[email protected]>,
   [email protected] (Michael Stiler) wrote:

>Well, no foolin', Sister Rosa?  Alt.fan.gene-scott?  Wow.  I'm impressed.
>If you'd _happen_ to pay attention before you wrote something, you'd
>have known that I happen to watch Dr. Scott when he's on tv - I actually
>enjoy him.

How much will you enjoy Him when His Tri-Cephalic Proctologist catches
you out?

We'll See Won't We.

>As for 'chumpy ass old dumb**** men', you obviously
>haven't been seeing the new blood coming into the Masonic Lodges -
>bright, educated young men (they start at 21 years of age and go up from
>there.

Whoops. Sorry to intrude on your troll here Brother Michael. This
Usenet thing gets so confusing.

>...<smile>.

Lose this Mikey. Do you think that cute ascii will appease the hordes
of enraged 'tards that are headed your way.

--
0-
                                   -Brien-
                               {[email protected]}


Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1